It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: Kettu
If he picked any politician the left would complain he's keeping the establishment.
If he picked anyone with business or similar experience the left would complain he's playing favorites/conflict of interest/pay to play.
If he picked someone from who's left, those without experience the left would complain they lack experience.
Ugh.
originally posted by: stolencar18
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Why is it a bad thing that he picked a rich guy? Are you jealous again?
I don't recall him or anyone on his campaign suggesting that draining the swamp meant lowering the average income level of people in office.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: WhateverYouSay
Sure, let's start with Betsy Devos. She got her money from an inheritance (same as Trump). Not sure I'd call that "success".
That evil witch.
“the average SPP [School Performance Profile] score for traditional public schools was 77.1,” but for charter schools it was 66.4, and cyber-charter schools came in at a low 46.8.
Tillerson was the CEO of an oil company. I'm guessing you probably don't even believe in climate change
I am an avid advocate of scientific literacy. Don't assume things. I don't put political religion above everything else. That said, being a CEO of a oil company isn't an inherently bad thing...Unless you think it is, and I can't help you with that.
and buy up patents to prevent electric cars from becoming popular. If you're not swayed by this argument, just think of it again in 20 years and think of the costs incurred then
So far you haven't provided any evidence of wrong doing. Just accusations.
Edit:
Not even accusations against specific individuals either, or even relevant accusations.
Ok, we know Exxon funded climate change denial. How is that not evidence of wrongdoing if you claim to believe the science?
...
Yes, climate change anti science was funded by Exxon under Tillerson's leadership. How is it not relevant, your point was that people criticize these people because of envy, my point is these people are greedy MFers who do not operate on notions of meritocracy (the idea of capitalism), or do not operate in the public good (anti science and foreign wars).
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: jtma508
That just reinforced my post. Innocent until proven guilty is a principle I thought we embodied as Americans. I'm passionate about it anyways.