Let me start with this. Referring to "The Russians" implies that the Russian government was involved. Most individuals that say "The Russians" have
no specific evidence other than the fact that some of the hacking appears to be Russia related. Language, location, etc. But to provide a
comparison, if you hacked the Russian government...they could say the same about "The Americans".
This article, which is technically accurate (I've been in the computer field since 1989) and basically states that there is no proof, no "smoking gun"
that the Russian government had any involvement in the hacking. It might have...but without proof, you can't indite or convict and therefore,
shouldn't execute. Also...this is from Digg with the article being from TheIntercept which from what I can tell...both are usually liberal based.
Read the Article here!
So...we know the DNC are liars, we know Obama has lied for his own benefit and we know our government includes individuals and leaders that will lie
to support the left's views, goals and agendas. So I figured I would throw out a possible theory about the DNC hacks that discovered undisputed lies
and corruption by the DNC, their leaders, employees and Clinton herself.
It could have been ISIS! The trail of the evidence includes such things like (and I'm giving examples for the non-technical) a Word document whose
language was set to Russian. Internet domains purchased by someone in Russia...etc. Things that anyone can do with the right knowledge (nothing
really special) and anyone located in Russia. So what if ISIS planted a few people in Russia? What if the goal was to cause a conflict between the
United States and Russia? What if that "goal" was to cause at least political conflict, maybe even against Trump with the high-hopes of a military
All it would take is a few ISIS hackers (yes...they have them and use them) to enter Russia...buy a domain...use Russian set language, etc. within
their software...hack from a Russian IP (basically all you could do from inside Russia) and then maybe throw in a few Russian references in your
naming of things. Kremlin.doc, RedArmy.xls, and such.
So who is to benefit the most from the DNC hacking? Russia or ISIS...or someone else. Russia risks sanctions...charges and maybe attacks. What do
they gain? A little "mischief night level" confusion and pranks? What would ISIS potentially gain? Pitting two powers against each other including
one that supports Iran and one that supports Israel? Two powers with one that supports Syria? Both with military in the middle east...who are weary
of each other...who have nukes...who have leaders that care more about their personal appearance than the countries they lead (Obama and Putin)?
I would say ISIS sounds like a strong possibility...but so would Iran. But the bottom line is, the "evidence" is bull-crap and easily manipulated by
anyone who wishes to do so. Besides...wouldn't a professional hacker considering changing their docuement settings to a different language than their
own? Even I clear my browsing history once in a while
PS: Important...and, any major government agency that says "IT WAS THE RUSSIANS" with this little information (unless there is more we don't know and
no one has said that) would be negligent, unprofessional and a lie. Would the CIA, FBI, etc. really say that it was Russia for a fact if there was
any doubt? I would think not...unless...they have their own (or a President's or a political party's) agenda which is more important to them than the
truth and their reputation.
edit on 12/15/2016 by WeAreAWAKE because: Added PS