It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Has the source of the Podesta emails ever been disclose?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   
Everyone is talking how the Russians hacked things. To my knowledge, no one has come up with any hard evidence of how or who broke the Podesta emails to Wikileaks. Now people are claiming the Russians did. Does anyone have any evidence of who did the leak? The latest I've head was a DNC IT employee told Podesta to reply to a lame "your emails have been hacked, send us your login info". That's hardly convincing to me.

Has anyone seen any real info on how it was hacked or leaked. I'm referring to the podesta emails not the DNC ones and not Clinton server




posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 14-12-2016 by jjkenobi because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil
Just one small question. Have the podestas ever admitted that they were actually their e mails?



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

I noticed the original 'phishing scam' email is not among those released by wikileaks. Only the followup emails are in the archive. In fact, the version Podesta forwarded isn't in the archive either.

I am curious if the header info for the original phishing-scam email contains any info. But, alas, it is curiously missing from the leak archive.



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: pavil
Just one small question. Have the podestas ever admitted that they were actually their e mails?


not sure, but in all this time, NOBODY has denied they were, so there is that.



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:29 AM
link   
No one knows where the leaks came from, the only "evidence" it was Russia is that apparently (this is not confirmed) the Hackers ip was from Russia and that the "software" I have no idea how these experts know what software was used but apparently the software has been used by Russian Hackers in the past because there was Russian code within the software.

So I don't know even if that's true because if they can't tell us with proof who hacked or leaked the emails how can they tell us what software was used.

As for Julian he was out spoken about dnc staff member Seth rich but never confirmed if he was the leak or not.

So all in all no one knows. well besides who the leak was and Julian himself.

If we do look at the previous leaks and where they have come from the ones that we know about and have proof of where the leaks came from it has always been an inside source.



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

I have never heard of anybody claiming responsibility for the source of the leaks. What is important is what was leaked I believe.
The DNC and the Hillary people tried to hijack the party and got rid of Bernie Sanders. Now I'm no Socialist, but I would have voted for Bernie and hoped he surrounded himself with people who knew what they were doing. The people that wanted a Democrat for President shouldn't be mad at Trump, but the DNC. They are the ones who screwed everything up. The DNC is through as long as they keep these people in these top positions with no real agenda that helps the American people.
I'm a Democrat who voted for Trump and I'm switching parties after reading the Podesta and Clinton emails. I will now be an Independent and the DNC can just Kiss my behind. I'm sick of the crap.





posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: jjkenobi
a reply to: pavil

www.abovetopsecret.com...


I've seen that. It's too teasing and vauge.



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: justneo
No one knows where the leaks came from, the only "evidence" it was Russia is that apparently (this is not confirmed) the Hackers ip was from Russia and that the "software" I have no idea how these experts know what software was used but apparently the software has been used by Russian Hackers in the past because there was Russian code within the software.

So I don't know even if that's true because if they can't tell us with proof who hacked or leaked the emails how can they tell us what software was used.

As for Julian he was out spoken about dnc staff member Seth rich but never confirmed if he was the leak or not.

So all in all no one knows. well besides who the leak was and Julian himself.

If we do look at the previous leaks and where they have come from the ones that we know about and have proof of where the leaks came from it has always been an inside source.


I think you are referring to the Guicefer II hack of the DNC. Those emails show those traces. I have not heard the Podesta emails even remotely linked to Russian sources. Only Assange would know that and he has said they were "leaks" not hacks like Guicefer II.



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 10:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: pavil
Just one small question. Have the podestas ever admitted that they were actually their e mails?


not sure, but in all this time, NOBODY has denied they were, so there is that.

If you visit the Wiki leaks site, most of the Podesta emails have been verified as being real and not edited.
edit on b000000312016-12-14T10:57:32-06:0010America/ChicagoWed, 14 Dec 2016 10:57:32 -06001000000016 by butcherguy because: spelling



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 11:14 AM
link   

US Intelligence Agency Personnel Initiate Counter-coup against Hillary



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
Steve Pieczenik claims that it was him and a coalition of intelligence community members who leaked the emails to Wikileaks. This was part of (or the initiation of) a counter coup.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 12:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnonSapien
Steve Pieczenik claims that it was him and a coalition of intelligence community members who leaked the emails to Wikileaks. This was part of (or the initiation of) a counter coup.

www.youtube.com...


I don't see any proof of his claims either........



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   
The Russians: the Russian gov. or Russian hackers? The US amd Russian governments hack each other on a daily basis (the CIA has to do something with all these high paid agents). Weather or not they would leak it is another question.
A reasonable government would increase safety after these hacks. I remember when Merkel was hacked by the US (and whe was angry about that rightfully) some institutions got bacl to TYPEWRITERS (probably they are mothballed after the first wave of outrage). A friend of mine works for a public institution (nothing high secutity, simply a building institution) and no employee has internet access. There's only one central computer eith access to the net (it is probably a good thing to increase the output of the staff).



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: crayzeed



Have the podestas ever admitted that they were actually their e mails?


No, but the white house did:



Sorry the video title contains the forbidden word.



posted on Dec, 14 2016 @ 11:34 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss




Internal Coup against Hillary Clinton has begun


How can it be a coup when she did not win the election?

Is it not Clinton who is committing the coup? Funded by George Soros?

It seems to me that our regime change chickens have come home to roost.



posted on Dec, 15 2016 @ 11:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: OuttaHere
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss




Internal Coup against Hillary Clinton has begun


How can it be a coup when she did not win the election?

Is it not Clinton who is committing the coup? Funded by George Soros?

It seems to me that our regime change chickens have come home to roost.

I think the word "counter-coup" would have been more accurate.



posted on Dec, 15 2016 @ 10:08 PM
link   
a reply to: kreidebrei

The DNC were Guicefer II, which may be Russian related. Podesta's wikileaks are not from Guicefer II. People always lump them together (intentionally? ).




top topics



 
2

log in

join