It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

10 Ways the CIA’s ‘Russian Hacking’ Story is Left-Wing ‘Fake News’

page: 5
50
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 13 2016 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Why did they publish the Syria files, Bilal Erdogan's email ...

Why do I argue anyway, you lack the intellectual honesty to consider the content of wikileaks but will rather scream like a maniac that they are Russian assets ... with no proof of course, because if you ever had one you would have had the opportunity to post it.

Your neo-McCarthyism has reached pathological levels.




posted on Dec, 13 2016 @ 12:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Don't forget to add NATO to the list.
But even among Alphabet agencies, there is no unanimity :

Top U.S. spy agency has not embraced CIA assessment on Russia hacking



posted on Dec, 13 2016 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

BTW, don't forget that the Feds admitted that they "remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure"...


U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results

NOV. 26, 2016

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.

That said, since we do not know if the Russians had planned any malicious cyber activity for election day, we don’t know if they were deterred from further activity by the various warnings the U.S. government conveyed.


www.nytimes.com...

But it seems the news media, including the NYT have forgotten about this.



posted on Dec, 13 2016 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse


BTW, don't forget that the Feds admitted that they "remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure"...


Do you not understand the difference between affecting the election by leaking embarrassing information and actually changing the vote electronically, or are you just posting inane propaganda?



posted on Dec, 13 2016 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ElectricUniverse


BTW, don't forget that the Feds admitted that they "remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure"...


Do you not understand the difference between affecting the election by leaking embarrassing information and actually changing the vote electronically, or are you just posting inane propaganda?


You are 100% correct.

The rhetoric has changed considerably.

"Russian hacking" requires proof of a crime.

"Russia influencing" by pulling back the curtain on the Clinton machine, well, that is just ready made for media spin. No proof needed. Just say:
"polls show Clinton would have won, if only people didn't know about ..."
"an anonymous source says Trump would have lost if voters hadn't known about Clinton doing ..."
"Sources close to the election are confident we would have had a different outcome if only the Russian hadn't exposed ..."

Does anyone else find it ironic that the left is complaining about the Clinton machine being brought down by Russian leaks and they are using CIA leaks to do it?
edit on 13-12-2016 by 200Plus because: left out a word "known" - oops



posted on Dec, 15 2016 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: MysticPearl

"No you're the racist!" HAR HAR! HAR HAR! You sure did tell them libtards! Boy are you clever.


Well to be

PERFECTLY CLEAR.

The Left is showing the country what XENOPHOBIA is pointing the finger at RUSSIA.

For effs sake.

Denial.

Wasn't just an election this year.



new topics

top topics
 
50
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join