It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

10 Ways the CIA’s ‘Russian Hacking’ Story is Left-Wing ‘Fake News’

page: 2
50
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 02:59 PM
link   
This anti-Russian witch hunt(by liberal definitions) is more racist and xenophobic than anything towards Mexico in the year preceding the election.




posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:00 PM
link   
Breitbart is a fake news site.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: MysticPearl

"No you're the racist!" HAR HAR! HAR HAR! You sure did tell them libtards! Boy are you clever.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: xuenchen

1. According to who?
2. According to two Republicans who've viewed it, one of them being McConnell whose wife just got an appointment.
3. Of course they're not? The CIA doesn't do that.
4. What kind of evidence are you looking for?
5. Example?
6. It was denied once? No reason to believe that Assange would even know the original source if an intermediary was used.
7. Okay.
8. Oh, so it's okay it happened because we "deserve it" because Trump Pravda says so. Got it.
9. Oh! Russian influence is okay as long as Breitbart shills approve. Check.
10. They were really stretching to get this list to 10.



And yet you offer nothing concrete to dispute it because you have nothing.

Someone's in discredit mode today.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

And right on time, there's the generic liberal tantrum in response.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:06 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Consider as well that Wikileaks sent a reminder on twitter that they already released files about some of the upcoming Trump administration members :

John Bolton

Rex Tillerson




posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl
This anti-Russian witch hunt(by liberal definitions) is more racist and xenophobic than anything towards Mexico in the year preceding the election.



So, black liberals are after White Russians?

In their defense it's a damn good drink.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: xuenchen

1. According to who?
2. According to two Republicans who've viewed it, one of them being McConnell whose wife just got an appointment.
3. Of course they're not? The CIA doesn't do that.
4. What kind of evidence are you looking for?
5. Example?
6. It was denied once? No reason to believe that Assange would even know the original source if an intermediary was used.
7. Okay.
8. Oh, so it's okay it happened because we "deserve it" because Trump Pravda says so. Got it.
9. Oh! Russian influence is okay as long as Breitbart shills approve. Check.
10. They were really stretching to get this list to 10.



And yet you offer nothing concrete to dispute it because you have nothing.

Someone's in discredit mode today.


and what does the OP offers exactly?
jeez

no one knows for sure who leaked what was leaked.
should matter who leaked what was leaked, depends
should we focus more on the massive corruption which ultimately gave Trump the oval office, yes.

-the absence of evidence isnt evidence of absence though.
edit on 12-12-2016 by odzeandennz because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: xuenchen

Consider as well that Wikileaks sent a reminder on twitter that they already released files about some of the upcoming Trump administration members :

John Bolton

Rex Tillerson



Might be some good stuff in those !!

Good find.




posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueMule

originally posted by: MysticPearl
This anti-Russian witch hunt(by liberal definitions) is more racist and xenophobic than anything towards Mexico in the year preceding the election.



So, black liberals are after White Russians?

In their defense it's a damn good drink.


White Russians for the win.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl
Why complete silence from the left about a foreigner in Soros actually owning the voting machines in numerous key states?


And the Right for Diebold machines.
link



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft


Russia, or any of her affiliates, hacking or even meddling in USA elections is a fairy tale. But, show me any proof and I'll take a look - so far BS claims without proof is BS.


Here you go. This isn't a new thing. The publicly available information was persuasive enough in terms of the DNC hacks. I haven't seen any proof about Podesta.

You'll have floppy headed muppet pro-liars like Sean Spicer casting doubt on the evidence but what he won't tell is that the RNC contracted CrowdStrike right after CrowdStrike's CTO published evidence that Russians had hacked the DNC. That evidence came out the day before the "Guccifer 2.0" WordPress site was put up — before that the general public even knew that that there had been a hack.

As I said, the Podesta hack is a different story but when it comes to the DNC hack, there's a significant amount of forensic evidence that points to Russians and you don't need the CIA to brief you on it. It's about as much forensic evidence as there ever is and more than in most cases.


Your source is a trigger because Steve Bannon.


Seriously, screw Breitbart.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Nothing concrete to dispute what? I've done more research into the topic than probably ever other poster in this thread combined and I published some of it on ATS months ago.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Might be some good stuff in those !!

Good find.


I'm sure you'll report back with the findings as soon as Breitbart doesn't post a story about it that Drudge never promotes.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: theantediluvian

And right on time, there's the generic liberal tantrum in response.


There's nothing generic about me but I will admit that I have a difficult time picking some of you out from the herd. Could you point to yourself in this photo please?




posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Do me a favour because I genuinely don't have the time to sift through each of your links but I'll certainly look at any evidence - can you please give me the link to this particular claim...


CrowdStrike's CTO published evidence that Russians had hacked the DNC

edit on 12-12-2016 by Sublimecraft because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: network dude

And I thought the left didn't
buy conspiracy theories, which is what it is.



They'll buy ocean front property in Chicago if it'll fit in with their agenda.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: xuenchen

Consider as well that Wikileaks sent a reminder on twitter that they already released files about some of the upcoming Trump administration members :

John Bolton

Rex Tillerson



Note that those documents were leaked well before those individuals were considered for positions in the Trump administration. It will be interesting to see if they remain on WikiLeaks or if they are mysteriously redacted.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: xuenchen

1. According to who?
2. According to two Republicans who've viewed it, one of them being McConnell whose wife just got an appointment.
3. Of course they're not? The CIA doesn't do that.
4. What kind of evidence are you looking for?
5. Example?
6. It was denied once? No reason to believe that Assange would even know the original source if an intermediary was used.
7. Okay.
8. Oh, so it's okay it happened because we "deserve it" because Trump Pravda says so. Got it.
9. Oh! Russian influence is okay as long as Breitbart shills approve. Check.
10. They were really stretching to get this list to 10.



As were you.



posted on Dec, 12 2016 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

There you go, let it out.

We're all here to assist in helping you in getting thru this tough time.



new topics

top topics



 
50
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join