It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlueMule
a reply to: network dude
Yeah, like I said do you got any bigger bombshells from the emails than an anti-Bernie agenda in the DNC? Or anything damning that Hillary herself wrote?
it's not news to me that human nature is corrupt, ya'know.
You are being told to be angry that the truth was revealed.
originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: network dude
Ladies and Gentleman's, President-elect Donald Trump :
‘Conspiracy theory’: Trump dismisses CIA claim of Russian hacking
“These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,” Trump’s transition team replied, before adding, “It’s now time to move on and Make America Great Again.”
As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.
The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of “Russia”, while still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.
originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: Pyle
Did you read the said doc ?
'Our estimates' ... 'there could be' ... lots of ifs and speculations ...
There are probably evidences that Saddam has had access to bacteriological warfare but the CIA will never release the original US invoices delivered when Saddam bought them.
originally posted by: jhn7537
Just curious to see where most people stand...
What do you find to be a worse...
1. A hack to obtain material, illegally done
2. The content within the hack, which is very very damning material
I feel most would/will side with 2, which begs the question why the MSM puts all their focus on 1... I know why they do, but watching the MSM blatantly ignore the contents within the hacks shows the depth of their relationships with the Obama administration..
are there any Americans here on ATS that care about a political party being hacked, regardless of political party?......I guess not, is what i'm reading
originally posted by: peskyhumans
They didn't. This whole "Russia did it" thing is a cover-up by the democrats to conceal the fact that they murdered Seth Rich. Seth Rich is the person who sold them out to Wikileaks. Why? Probably because he couldn't handle all the pure evil anymore and had to do something about it.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Two things.
One it is not so much the MSM that are pressing this issue.Last night on late night news, I saw a number of prominent Republicans speaking up with great concern on this issue. And yes, it was 'reported' on MSM
As Indigent points out the information was one sided. One of the tactics of propaganda is omission.
I missed the part of your post that presented evidence it was Russia that did the hacking. In relation to the OP your post is moot.