It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Details and Analysis of Donald Trump’s Tax Plan
September 29, 2015
By
Alan Cole
Key Findings:
Mr. Trump’s tax plan would substantially lower individual income taxes and the corporate income tax and eliminate a number of complex features in the current tax code.
Mr. Trump’s plan would cut taxes by $11.98 trillion over the next decade on a static basis. However, the plan would end up reducing tax revenues by $10.14 trillion over the next decade when accounting for economic growth from increases in the supply of labor and capital.
The plan would also result in increased outlays due to higher interest on the debt, creating a ten-year deficit somewhat larger than the estimates above.
According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, the plan would significantly reduce marginal tax rates and the cost of capital, which would lead to an 11 percent higher GDP over the long term provided that the tax cut could be appropriately financed.
The plan would also lead to a 29 percent larger capital stock, 6.5 percent higher wages, and 5.3 million more full-time equivalent jobs.
The plan would cut taxes and lead to higher after-tax incomes for taxpayers at all levels of income.
...
Our analysis finds that the plan would reduce federal revenues by $11.98 trillion over the next decade. However, it also would improve incentives to work and invest, which could increase gross domestic product (GDP) by 11 percent over the long term. This increase in GDP would translate into 6.5 percent higher wages and 5.3 million new full-time equivalent jobs. After accounting for increased incomes due to these factors, the plan would only reduce tax revenues by $10.14 trillion.
...
Proposed Tax Changes in President Obama’s Fiscal Year 2016 Budget
February 11, 2015
By
Andrew Lundeen
President Obama recently presented his budget proposal for the 2016 fiscal year. The budget proposes $3.99 trillion in spending and $3.53 trillion in revenue for a deficit of $474 billion for 2016 and a number of new tax proposals.
In total, the plan includes $2.4 trillion in proposed tax increases offset by $713 billion in new credits, deductions, and other offsets, for a total tax increase of nearly $1.7 trillion over the next ten years.
...
Tax Increases
The president proposes $1.85 trillion in tax increases, with many of the tax increases focused on high-income earners.
Increase Capital Gains Tax Rate to 28 Percent and Eliminate Stepped Up Basis
The president’s proposal would increase the top capital gains tax rate from 23.8 percent to 28 percent (37.2 percent in California) and eliminate stepped-up basis—a change would potentially create a 68 percent tax on capital gains upon death. Our analysis finds that the capital gains tax increase alone would shrink the economy by 0.8 percent, eliminate 135,000 jobs and actually lose revenue in the long run. Revenue estimate: $208 billion over ten years.
...
originally posted by: projectvxn
I like it.
But without deep cuts to government spending it could cause solvency problems over the next decade.
Entire departments would have to be axed. Not that I have a problem with that, but good luck getting congress to go along with it. We all know republicans are just as much in favor of big government as are democrats.
originally posted by: AlbanArthur
originally posted by: projectvxn
I like it.
But without deep cuts to government spending it could cause solvency problems over the next decade.
Entire departments would have to be axed. Not that I have a problem with that, but good luck getting congress to go along with it. We all know republicans are just as much in favor of big government as are democrats.
So it's great to keep 800 factory jobs in Illinois but entire federal departments need to be axed?
And what about those jobs?
Keep 800 unskilled labor jobs while creating millions of unemployed?
Great plan.......
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Caver78
The federal government cannot tell states how to tax citizens.
It would have already if it had that power. It's a good thing they don't.
Keep 800 unskilled labor jobs while creating millions of unemployed?
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
He isn't even in office,he has no tax plan etched in stone,I find it funny how everyone becomes a psychic,kind of like the phone call,on pure speculation
originally posted by: projectvxn
I like it.
But without deep cuts to government spending it could cause solvency problems over the next decade.
Entire departments would have to be axed. Not that I have a problem with that, but good luck getting congress to go along with it. We all know republicans are just as much in favor of big government as are democrats.
originally posted by: projectvxn
I like it.
But without deep cuts to government spending it could cause solvency problems over the next decade.
Entire departments would have to be axed. Not that I have a problem with that, but good luck getting congress to go along with it. We all know republicans are just as much in favor of big government as are democrats.