It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TREASON: FBI Confirm Hillary Gave Classified Material To At Least 5 Foreign Governments!

page: 5
89
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.

Seems like when she was fired during water gate they should have flushed twice.




posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.

Seems like when she was fired during water gate they should have flushed twice.


She was not fired during Watergate. Facebook and memes much?

Snopes

The person who was alleged to have fired her had no power to do so, though he did not like her.
edit on 11-12-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.

Seems like when she was fired during water gate they should have flushed twice.


She was not fired during Watergate. Facebook and memes much?

Snopes

The person who was alleged to have fired her had no power to do so, though he did not like her.


Snopes



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

She had a server and an IT expert. A little bit of a difference there.


Except for the expert that had to plead the 5th a hundre times.


Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition

check.



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.

Seems like when she was fired during water gate they should have flushed twice.


She was not fired during Watergate. Facebook and memes much?

Snopes

The person who was alleged to have fired her had no power to do so, though he did not like her.


Snopes


If you don't like snopes, you can find the fact she was not fired in many places. Snopes even quotes other places where the man who allegedly fired her states he would have if he could have as he did not like her.


But as noted above, Zeifman had no authority to "terminate" Hillary. They were members of different staffs, and Zeifman had no hiring or firing authority over members of the Impeachment Inquiry staff for which Hillary worked. (That authority rested with Special Counsel John Doar and, ultimately, with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino.) Quite tellingly, Zeifman made absolutely no mention of having "fired" or "terminated" Hillary Rodham, nor of telling her that he "could not recommend her for any further positions," in his 1995 book; he only started claiming so much later. Back in 1995 he noted that Hillary had remained with the inquiry staff up until the end, leaving only when President Nixon's August 1974 resignation made the issue of impeachment moot and the Judiciary Committee's impeachment inquiry staff was therefore disbanded:



edit on 11-12-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.

Seems like when she was fired during water gate they should have flushed twice.


She was not fired during Watergate. Facebook and memes much?

Snopes

The person who was alleged to have fired her had no power to do so, though he did not like her.


Snopes


If you don't like snopes, you can find the fact she was not fired in many places. Snopes even quotes other places where the man who allegedly fired her states he would have if he could have as he did not like her.




I know, from what I have read all the claims that there were statements made about her being a liar and dishonest are true, but she was not fired.

I just found it funny you would use Snopes after criticising someone about facebook and memes. They are probably more reliable than Snopes.
edit on 11/12/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.



FBI Director Comey testified before Congress that Hillary was incompetent. Hillary says she mentally short-circuits. What's the legal term that Defense Attorney's use to get their clients off the hook who have mental issues?



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.

Seems like when she was fired during water gate they should have flushed twice.


She was not fired during Watergate. Facebook and memes much?

Snopes

The person who was alleged to have fired her had no power to do so, though he did not like her.


Snopes


If you don't like snopes, you can find the fact she was not fired in many places. Snopes even quotes other places where the man who allegedly fired her states he would have if he could have as he did not like her.




I know, from what I have read all the claims that there were statements made about her being a liar and dishonest are true, but she was not fired.

I just found it funny you would use Snopes after criticising someone about facebook and memes. They are probably more reliable than Snopes.


Facebook and memes are not more reliable than Snopes. If you look at just that one article, they did due diligence in finding the facts of this issue. Memes and Facebook do no such thing.



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:33 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Snopes, ha, ha , ha.




Facebook and memes are not more reliable than Snopes. If you look at just that one article, they did due diligence in finding the facts of this issue. Memes and Facebook do no such thing.



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Snopes, ha, ha , ha.




Facebook and memes are not more reliable than Snopes. If you look at just that one article, they did due diligence in finding the facts of this issue. Memes and Facebook do no such thing.


Thank you for that hard hitting journalistic effort.


Snopes checks facts. They do a fairly good job. They did a better job than you on the Watergate and Hillary thing, yet you laugh at THEM. You might want to slow your roll.
edit on 11-12-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Water gate "thing" is easy to find if you take a second. And snopes still makes me chuckle, but just a little.



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Water gate "thing" is easy to find if you take a second. And snopes still makes me chuckle, but just a little.


Not sure why, she wasn't fired, yet you posted,FALSELY that she was.

Whether you like her or not, deny ignorance.
edit on 11-12-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 07:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and illegally put classified docs on it.

She was a Senator, SOS, and first lady she knew exactly what she was doing.

Seems like when she was fired during water gate they should have flushed twice.


She was not fired during Watergate. Facebook and memes much?

Snopes

The person who was alleged to have fired her had no power to do so, though he did not like her.


Snopes


If you don't like snopes, you can find the fact she was not fired in many places. Snopes even quotes other places where the man who allegedly fired her states he would have if he could have as he did not like her.




I know, from what I have read all the claims that there were statements made about her being a liar and dishonest are true, but she was not fired.

I just found it funny you would use Snopes after criticising someone about facebook and memes. They are probably more reliable than Snopes.


Facebook and memes are not more reliable than Snopes. If you look at just that one article, they did due diligence in finding the facts of this issue. Memes and Facebook do no such thing.


Snopes spend a lot of time constructing arguments that suit the left. The amount of work they do to push propaganda makes them even worse than a simple meme or facebook post.



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 07:26 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Wrong, she was fired.
Counsel confirms Hillary's 'fraudulent' Watergate brief
Clinton was fired for allegedly colluding with Kennedys to protect JFK legacy

Read more at www.wnd.com...



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: reldra

Wrong, she was fired.
Counsel confirms Hillary's 'fraudulent' Watergate brief
Clinton was fired for allegedly colluding with Kennedys to protect JFK legacy

Read more at www.wnd.com...


Seriously? Did you have a look at this site first or just pick the first garbage that claimed it was "confirmed" that popped up in your search? Get out of here with that nonsense.

about your "source"



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: tigertatzen

Is your point that they are good or bad?



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 08:00 PM
link   
a reply to: tigertatzen

But Hillary did get ash-canned right?

She never did rebut the claim, and we never saw any of her work or time stamps.

Hmmm.

Snopes ran around the block with their "false" claim.




posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 08:07 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvianwell let me see giving classified intel to enemy states for financial gain i would consider treason. wouldn't you. which is what she did then she destroyed evidence of said crime after it was ordered to be given to congress which is also a felony.



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 08:17 PM
link   
a reply to: proteus33

You have it 100% right. And she is never going to see a day in prison. Like the bankers in 2008.



posted on Dec, 11 2016 @ 08:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: muse7

I don't like Hillary and I'm OK with Trump. What exactly is Russia supposed to have done?


Revealed the truth about the Democratic party. Terrible thing to do to the American people, don't you know.


Oh come on now, it's not nice to be so truthful.

From what I read, the Russians hacked both Hillary's and Trump's servers but only released Hillary's info to Wikileaks. Maybe it is because Hillary's was actually more juicy.



new topics

top topics



 
89
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join