It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Pilgrum
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
Having watched the videos I somehow find it incredulous how no one can account for the acceleration in the rate of collapse. In my mind this can never be adequately explained away
And yet, to me, the buildings fell like anything would under the influence of gravity IE accelerating at a rate determined by the drag of the medium until it reached a terminal velocity where the forces were in balance. The design of those towers meant the floors were no stronger at the bottom than they were on the highest levels (with the exception of the 'mechanical' floors which were around 50% stronger).
originally posted by: mrthumpy
a reply to: Korg Trinity
Right. So you have no idea what should have happened but you can't believe it happened the way that is claimed.
Fair enough. As long as I know all you have is an argument from incredulity. Thanks for clearing that up
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Korg Trinity
You are so wrong......
Did the structures ever accelerate faster than 9.8 m /s^2? Or slower than? Simple question.......
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Korg Trinity
You are so wrong......
Did the structures ever accelerate faster than 9.8 m /s^2? Or slower than? Simple question.......
The simple Logic....
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Korg Trinity
You are so wrong......
Did the structures ever accelerate faster than 9.8 m /s^2? Or slower than? Simple question.......
The simple Logic....
Simple logic by simpletons. What dolt made this video? Actually, I thought that the Death Rays from Space was far more imaginative. Bring us more dustification!
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Korg Trinity
You are so wrong......
Did the structures ever accelerate faster than 9.8 m /s^2? Or slower than? Simple question.......
The simple Logic....
Simple logic by simpletons. What dolt made this video? Actually, I thought that the Death Rays from Space was far more imaginative. Bring us more dustification!
of course... you cannot discredit the information as it is correct...
Therefore the move to discredit it begins...
O.k.
This video was made to get the main points across... It is however backed up with Math and Science.....
knock yourself out... if you can find an error in the calculations we would be delighted.
Chandler_DownwardAccelerationOfWTC1-NoMath.pdf
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Korg Trinity
You are so wrong......
Did the structures ever accelerate faster than 9.8 m /s^2? Or slower than? Simple question.......
The simple Logic....
Simple logic by simpletons. What dolt made this video? Actually, I thought that the Death Rays from Space was far more imaginative. Bring us more dustification!
of course... you cannot discredit the information as it is correct...
Therefore the move to discredit it begins...
O.k.
This video was made to get the main points across... It is however backed up with Math and Science.....
knock yourself out... if you can find an error in the calculations we would be delighted.
Chandler_DownwardAccelerationOfWTC1-NoMath.pdf
doubleedit on 12/17/2016 by pteridine because: Double post
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Korg Trinity
So you are angry because the falling floors encountered enough resistance they never reached the free fall acceleration of 9.8m/s^2.
You are angry because large sections of vertical columns were left standing after the complete collapse of the floor system, and took measurable seconds to complete their toppling over?
And you offer no alternate after 15 years to the theory of inward bowing as recorded and documented during the WTC 2 collapse from one of the most recorded and documented events in human history?
What were you arguing again?
originally posted by: pteridine
There will be an equilibrium velocity reached that is limited by the resistance to collapse.
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
Anger is not an emotion I have felt here at all, amusement would be the better term to describe my emotional state, since an acceleration of 9.8m/s^2 would mean the wtc collapsed upwards into the air!
So the acceleration of the collapse was -6.31 m/s^2 which is taken from the observations of the video evidence and corroborated by cross referencing a variety of other data sources.
So the Collapse Accelerated straight down.........
You do Acknowledge that fact right?
Korg.
whatis.techtarget.com...
Gravitational acceleration (symbolized g) is an expression used in physics to indicate the intensity of a gravitational field. It is expressed in meters per second squared (m/s 2 ). At the surface of the earth, 1 g is about 9.8 m/s 2 .
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: pteridine
There will be an equilibrium velocity reached that is limited by the resistance to collapse.
The acceleration remained constant the entire way down... WTC1 collapsed in approx 11 seconds.... exactly as would be the case if the acceleration remained constant at -6.31 m/s2.
I might add that the data isn't the result of any manipulation at all, the sample points sit very well on a projected line with a deviation of only 0.003%....
So in other words, we know the building came down and experienced a constant acceleration....
Do you see?
Korg.
originally posted by: neutronflux
You might want to refresh on your basic physics, because you just made a mistake out of simple ignorance trying to be cute.