I'm new to this site so bear with me here. I have a special interest in this topic because I have written 2 research papers on AIDS/HIV. However,
none of that establishment-backed info holds a torch to all that I have recently learned through alternative media.
First off, I love Flyerfan's covert racism. "Maybe it's their choice of lifestyle. We have BRAINS and self control, we're not ANIMALS."
Please. Why don't you come out and call us monkeys.
I'm not suggesting that some black Americans don't lead this kind of lifestyle. But please don't pretend that members of my community are the only
ones who do so. I mean, anytime you do a search for porn in a search engine, almost all the links generically go to white porn of various sorts.
But, that doesn't mean non-black people are hypersexual, right? The noticeably higher new rates of infection among black Americans, who make up a
small fraction of the US population, is just a result of our reckless lifestyle. Right.
And for the person who says the hood is in denial, I disagree totally with that. How in the hell can you live in the hood and not know that the
situation is bad there? Oh, I'm sorry, only black people are on welfare, only black people are promiscuous, only black people share dirty needles.
(Hey, I thought black people had the monopoly on crack)
By the way, I'm sure you people also feel that the CIA-run drug empire (see war on drugs) is another baseless "conspiracy theory." I'm sure
you're also unaware that the CIA, in their own documents, admit that they "accidentally" brought in a ton of nearly PURE coc aine in 1990
(hey, it's easy to overlook a ton of snow when you're coming back from South America).
But anyway, back to the topic. Suppose the black Americans polled are wrong. Suppose we do need a scapegoat for the pandemic ravaging our community.
If this is all true, then what do we make of the following?
1. There are multiple strains of HIV (they actually admit this). What they don't tell you is that the first cases of AIDS in Africa showed up 5
YEARS after it was here in America. Also, the strains in Africa are different (generally) than the strains here. Tell me, how does a disease that
supposedly came from monkeys in Africa come over here 5 years BEFORE it "originates" in Africa? Hmmm....
2. Some of the establishment-backed molecular biologists claim that HIV was in the human genome since the 1930's. So, if this is true, explain how
this dormant virus suddenly became active in gay white Americans, then in heterosexual black Africans 5 years later. (Wait, it started in Africa, I
3. The mainstream story makes no sense (as usual). If one monkey bites one African, who then bones his wife and a couple of hookers, who then bone
their clients, how do we suddenly see MILLIONS of people infected with the virus? Even if you assume that transmission occurs 100% of the time during
intercourse (which is more like 30-40%), this is quite an exponential growth rate of infection. If HIV was airborne this might be more believable,
but it was supposedly initially transmitted primarily as an STD. (Oh, I forgot, black people are sex-addicted animals with no self-control, so that
"Common sense" tells us that the idea that the US government would deliberately create HIV/AIDS is ludicrous. On the contrary, common sense would
tell us the opposite.
Our government keeps yelling, "Terrorism, terrorism, homeland security, bioterrorism." At the same time, some of their top scientists are, at this
very moment, working on biological weapons, and have been doing so for decades (see eugenics, any top secret government activity, etc.). But hey, if
they've been working on this type of stuff for so long and "new" diseases emerge, it's all a coincidence.
Corinthas (sorry if I misspelled it) is right on the money. Israel and other countries are developing ethno-specific bioweapons.
The WHO has been caught again and again administering "contaminated" vaccines to unsuspecting people (sterilizing agents to Mexican and Nicaraguan
women, cancer viruses to various people, etc.).
The US government has a "tendency" to release classified documents concerning top secret tests on the American public (that's you and me) decades
after they have done it. For example...
-In 1968, they sprayed people in NYC (regardless of race) with either nerve gas or bacteria, I can't recall for sure right now.
-They sprayed clouds of virulent bacteria in the skies of San Francisco, making a number of people sick and even killing some.
-Then there's the good ol' Tuskegee incident, which you all acknowledge. Btw, this thing went on for 40 YEARS (1932-72) before they finally shut it
down. When some of the men sought medical treatment, they either denied anything was wrong, gave them BS pills to take, or even denied them
treatment. (Hey, it was done to document the long-term effects of syphilis, so so what if some were sacrificed. We're all about promoting the
collective good of the majority here). But hey, that was in the past, I'm sure they wouldn't do it again...
If you still don't believe me, look at the wonderful track record they have with the military. If they're sadistic enough to experiment on their
own people, what makes you think they wouldn't try to eradicate a race of people who have been through much drama over the centuries, despite our
contributions to society. Well, here's some more goodies for ya...
-They've been giving our troops vaccines for a long time. (They seem to love using vaccines as a way to get us) In fact, they make it a point to
experiment new drugs and agents on us (citizens and military) BEFORE they use them on enemies. Sounds crazy, huh? (Now I disagree with you
Flyersfan, but if they did give you bad vaccines when you were in the army, I truly am sorry. I support our military, and it sickens me when they do
those kinds of things to them).
-Recently, the whole DU (depleted uranium) thing broke. They admit that they use it in some US ammunition, but don't worry, the government claims
the risks are low. Tell that to the tens of thousands of troops coming home sick from the stuff.
-Remember Agent Orange? This stuff's a nasty carcinogenic, originally designed as an herbicide, that was sprayed on a bunch of people during the
Vietnam War. They ADMIT that they sprayed our own troops with the stuff. I have a friend whose dad was sprayed with it. Talk about freedom.
Honestly, I could go on forever about our loving, benevolent government because this crap goes on forever. But we'er talking about AIDS here. I
just wanted to establish that the government is quite capable of such a thing.
Personally, I am 95% sure that AIDS was designed to specifically attack black people. Sure, it can take anybody, but seriously, the numbers speak for
themselves. It's a fact that about 8% of the white population is immune to HIV (by the way, Dr. Robert Gallo and others who were part of the 1971
Special Cancer Virus Research program that produced HIV made it a point to dub the virus HUMAN immunodeficiency virus. This was to hide the fact that
they engineered it using cross species blends of retroviruses).
If this wasn't enough, HIV is just the tip of the iceberg. West Nile virus, ebola, and SARS are all viruses that were most likely produced in a lab.
Oh, if you think ethno-specific bioweapons are fake and that there's no AIDS plot against blacks, I bet you'd never believe that SARS was designed
to be Asian specific. (Look all this up if you don't believe me).
Look, they admit that they ROUTINELY produce recombinant viruses in order to "better be able to study the virus of interest." Right. You combine
smallpox and ebola, anthrax and flu, whatever (I came up with those, I'm not sure which viruses they actually combine), because you want to study a
disease. In the process, you create a new supervirus that has great potential as a bioweapon, give me a break.
There's a guy (can't recall his name) who's suing the US government for doing this. After a load of appeals, guess what the courts had to say
about the origin of the HIV virus? They said it's origin is a "frivolous" matter. That's funny, a leading official with the WHO agreed, saying
that the origin is not important to science. But, I thought they were seeking a cure for AIDS, wouldn't you want to know where it came from?
Look, I know all this info is radical, I know. I didn't believe it when I first learned about it. But after real research, you learn that something
is up. The reason they want to discredit this survey is because they didn't think we'd be smart enough to figure it out. (Black Americans have
suspected the government in this since 1990. Black Africans have known about this even before we knew. The same guy who's suing the government
discovered a flow chart that proves the government made HIV, and the African press put it on the front page of newspapers for 4 days straight.)
But why, you might ask. Even if this is true, why would they want to kill the black race? It's simple. They don't want just the black population
trimmed. They want the WORLD population cut down by 85-95%!!!!!!!
Don't believe that, I know. There's no reason that many world class scientists keep talking about population reduction. The UN doesn't have
population control plans. There's no way they would release plague after plague to trim down our numbers. Sure.
I had a professor who OPENLY said he wished 90% of the world's population were gone. He OPENLY said, during lectures, that he hoped that ebola,
which is 90% fatal, would evolve to become airborne and wipe out 9 out of 10 people on Earth. Incredible.
One last thing before I go. I don't know if anyone knows about this, but a LOT of microbiologists have been mysteriously dying these past few years
(actually, this has been happening since the 80s, but it's really accelerated in recent years). These have been prominent, world-class people in the
field. World-class. Why are all these top notch scientists dying? Makes you wonder.
The bottom line is this: the government created AIDS to kill blacks as part of a bigger population control plan. People who suggest that we black
Americans need to check ourselves need to check yourselves and the noble, loving, generous government you think would be incapable of such a thing.