It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House

page: 2
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:13 PM
link   
This was a baseless lie the first time they "reported" it and it's a lie this time.

Interesting how the "PropOrNot" spends a good amount of time spreading hateful Anti-Russian Propaganda.




posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:15 PM
link   
And what if she starts losing the civil FOIA lawsuits. Then who's fault is it? Let me guess. Anybody but her.


+1 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:17 PM
link   
Yet in this thread wikileaks claims it was the CIA and US intel who leaked to them, not Russia.

And in this thread it claims one of our agencies did it as well, not Russia.

Those threads have wikileaks putting their rep behind it and former NSA official William Binney putting his name to it. Above, we simply have the often wrong Washington Post and a nameless source. Sounds like fake news to me.
edit on 9-12-2016 by MysticPearl because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

I just finished reading this piece ....Blacklist Promoted by the Washington Post Has Apparent Ties to Ukrainian Fascism and CIA Spying....www.informationclearinghouse.info...

December 09, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "AlterNet" - Last month, the Washington Post gave a glowing front-page boost to an anonymous online blacklist of hundreds of American websites, from marginal conspiracy sites to flagship libertarian and progressive publications. As Max Blumenthal reported for AlterNet, the anonymous website argued that all of them should be investigated by the federal government and potentially prosecuted under the Espionage Act as Russian spies, for wittingly or unwittingly spreading Russian propaganda.
Probably the same group behind this story .fake news is probably what it really is



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:18 PM
link   
I've come to the conclusions that all MSM mouthpieces are to be considered fake news.

I don't buy this story.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:21 PM
link   
Funny how the WaPo is reacting as the clinical definition of insane
Trying something over and over again , hoping someone will listen
OOOPS , sorry OP , I guess you did listen...



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:23 PM
link   
Daily Caller quoted a statement released this afternoon from the Trump transition team:


"These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again,'” Trump’s transition team said in an unsigned statement."


The election ended a very long time ago! It doesn't matter what happened last month, it's this month! Wow that's pretty damn weak. It also sounds like there is a suggestion that the CIA is incompetent, has been for many many years and nothing they say should be believed.

That's a really interesting view for an incoming administration.


+2 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Fake News.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:25 PM
link   
So the Russians hacked the dnc to help Trump win the presidency before the primaries that there was no way Trump was going to win even happened? Sounds like wapo fake news.

What about Seth Rich? I thought he was the dnc leaker. Member wiki went nuts after he was mugged from behind.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Where did you come up with John Podesta's email was hacked because he lost his iPhone in DC? What is a "secret assessment?" It would be a CIA assessment (report, briefing, whatever you choose to call it) that was provided to members of Congress in secret, behind closed doors.

It wouldn't be okay to talk about it publicly. That's why it's a leak from unnamed sources.


Trump got Trump elected. You just need to get over it.


I know there's a lot of worship for Trump but his election isn't some new chapter in reality before which anything that occurred has lost all relevance. Wanton partisanship doesn't change objective reality. If it can be proven within a reasonable doubt that the Russian government was behind either the DNC or Podesta hacks — or both — during the US Presidential election, then it will most likely fall on the incoming administration to determine what the appropriate response will be.


The appropriate response is don't talk about stupid # you don't want anyone to know about using marginally secure means. Use another method, face to face, land line or snail mail. Anyone with half a brain and an email account knows you don't discuss things in email you don't want anyone to know about. At some point it will get hacked. It all gets hacked at some point.


+4 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:28 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

No, it sounds more like you got caught posting fake news and are now trying to deflect away from it.

Thread's a hoax, folks.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: MysticPearl

The first thread was complete BS. It's funny how quick people are to dismiss Russia as being behind the hacks but will believe basically anyone else is based on the strength of a thread title. Because I watched the video in the first and it didn't show Wikileaks or anyone dropping any bombshell.

But maybe you could explain what that bombshell was? If we can get past that, I'll watch the other video.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:33 PM
link   
a reply to: MysticPearl

Lol. "I don't like it! It's a hoax! Time to go talk about #PizzaGate some more!"



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Fake News.


Broken record.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:34 PM
link   
How were the Podesta emails intended to help trump? They could've went either way,

he could've turned out to be a decent guy. And the MSM collusion with Hillary also could've turned out to be false.
edit on 9-12-2016 by omniEther because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

It's evidence really hasn't been scarce in my opinion. There was a decent amount of evidence put forth that the Russians had hacked the DNC emails before the "Guccifer 2.0" wordpress site was created. Thread I authored about it Oct 1.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:38 PM
link   
This sounds to me like the same fake news that were in place during the elections to cause division, dissent, violence and protest.

I guess those behind the news wants to keep the nation as divided as possible to keep feeding the unrest.

Nothing worse than the scorn of an old women that lost the elections.

The failure of the recount is now spreading the madness on anything now.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: omniEther
How were the Podesta emails intended to help trump? They could've went either way,

he could've turned out to be a decent guy.


Are you arguing that if the emails had tended to paint Podesta as a saint, they would have been released? Does that make sense to you? Do you think the emails were doled out in tiny chunks for over a month for some reason other than to damage the Clinton campaign?



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian


Do you think the emails were doled out in tiny chunks for over a month for some reason other than to damage the Clinton campaign?


Here's an idea, instead of trying to delegitimize Julian Assange why don't you just learn how to hack and go get Trump's tax returns yourself. You can send them to Assange and if he chooses not to publish them you can come back here and tell us what a sell out he is.

Either way, your OP is deliberately obscure.



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join