It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kennedy Calls For U.S. Withdrawal From Iraq, UN Involvement

page: 1
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 06:22 AM
link   
Not that it would be a bad idea to "withdrawal" our troops from that sand box of death, but from all places of occupation. Then we close our borders,
stop foreign trade, replace the entire federal and other seats of government with fresh minds uncorrupted by the old wind bags in power now. We then would secure our "territories" and follow up with a reaffirmation of alliance from our supposed allies. I would go on, but that information is need to know.

"Democratic Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a leading opponent of the war in Iraq, is calling for the U.S. to withdraw its troops and let the United Nations help a new Iraqi government draft a constitution."

Jan. 27 (Bloomberg)

[edit on 27-1-2005 by ADVISOR]




posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 06:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by ADVISOR
Not that it would be a bad idea to "withdrawal" our troops from that sand box of death, but from all places of occupation. Then we close our borders,
stop foreign trade, replace the entire federal and other seats of government with fresh minds uncorrupted by the old wind bags in power now. We then would secure our "territories" and follow up with a reaffirmation of alliance from our supposed allies. I would go on, but that information is need to know.

"Democratic Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a leading opponent of the war in Iraq, is calling for the U.S. to withdraw its troops and let the United Nations help a new Iraqi government draft a constitution."

Jan. 27 (Bloomberg)

[edit on 27-1-2005 by ADVISOR]


Oh yes there teddy, lets let the UN continue it excelent job in Iraq. Like 12 years of "Saddam please play nice" and (hand reaches under table to take large amount of cash). Stay drunk teddy it is better for america...........



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 06:40 AM
link   
Couldn't resist. Our Kennedy, Charles Kennedy, leader of the Liberal Democrats and commanding aproximately 25% UK support and rising, is on the same page as your Kennedy.



British troops should be pulled out of Iraq as soon as possible, Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy said today.

Mr Kennedy said British forces should be replaced by troops from other countries – especially Islamic countries – as soon as the security situation allowed.

He said Britain and the USA must set out a “proper exit strategy” from Iraq after Sunday’s elections in the country.

The Liberal Democrats have consistently opposed the war. But they have said Britain had a responsibility not to simply pull out and abandon Iraq after the invasion.

news.scotsman.com...

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 06:48 AM
link   
Not only are they talented magicians, but they are useing both hands!

Redirection, is a classic distraction that many masters take pride in.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 07:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by DrHoracid
Oh yes there teddy, lets let the UN continue it excelent job in Iraq. Like 12 years of "Saddam please play nice" and (hand reaches under table to take large amount of cash).


12 years and no war and no WMDs

i'd rather all the money in the world pass under the table if it helps keep the peace. and guess what? it was.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 07:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by DrHoracid

Oh yes there teddy, lets let the UN continue it excelent job in Iraq. Like 12 years of "Saddam please play nice" and (hand reaches under table to take large amount of cash). Stay drunk teddy it is better for america...........


Coming form someone whos country had him removed from the threat list in 1982 so they could supply him with WMD, no he wasn't evil then.. he became evil waay later in 1992.




posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 07:47 AM
link   
Kennedy never learned the Vietnam lesson, did he?
(Friggn' drunk egomaniac lunkhead! - and I'm being nice!!)

Kerry called for an immediate withdraw from Vietnam.
He was quoted as saying that 'only' a few thousand
people would die if we fully withdrew.

Turns out that MILLIONS died in the killing fields. MILLIONS.

Kennedy's brain is pickled. Withdraw from Iraq??
Yeah, right. IDIOT! We are there. We have to
finish the job. Turn the country over to the Iraqi's
and let them run it. THEN we can get the hell out.
If the insurgents had half a brian, which obviously
they don't, they'd understand this and let the elections
take place and they'd stop blowing things up so we
could get the hell out and leave the Iraqis to sort out
their own country for the first time in 40 years.

Kennedy has as much going for him in the brain department
as the insurgents in Iraq have.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 08:31 AM
link   
Do you think the US will leave?
No they control a sizeable ammount of the oil in the world and are in a perfect place to strike at the middle east and "liberate" it.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 08:44 AM
link   
Im sure the Islamic Radicals thank Allah they have allies like Kennedy and Boxer in America and I promise you his statements will be played on Al Jazeera for propaganda purposes.

What a drunk fool!! Im wondering why a re-call campaign in his state has not been started yet?


Maximu§



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 08:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
Do you think the US will leave?
No they control a sizeable ammount of the oil.. .


Yeah, right. Hey ... remember KUWAIT. More than
ten years ago we went in and liberated it. They have a whole
bunch of oil. But yes, after liberation we went home and left
the liberated oil fields for the Kuwaities. Hate to burst your
anti-American bubble devilwasp ... we can't wait to get out
of Iraq and leave that dust hole to the locals ... oil and all.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
Yeah, right. Hey ... remember KUWAIT. More than
ten years ago we went in and liberated it. They have a whole
bunch of oil. But yes, after liberation we went home and left
the liberated oil fields for the Kuwaities. Hate to burst your
anti-American bubble devilwasp ... we can't wait to get out
of Iraq and leave that dust hole to the locals ... oil and all.

Oh, really? What about the 1,500 people there?
So Ali Al Salem Air Base is NOT home to the US 9th Air Expeditionary Group?
And infact we british have a squadron of tornados permantly assigned there.
The base is shared by all three countries yet these forces still stay there....



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 10:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
Oh, really? What about the 1,500 people there?

We have an invited outpost in friendly territory. That's hardly
an invasion and occupying force that has taken over and kept
the oil fields.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 11:08 AM
link   
The U.N is best suited to handle this reconstruction, not the U.S: they threw the world into this spurious war against an man they EBETTED for two decades. Calling him a 'drunkard' is ad hominem and does not detract from the logical volition of this sober remark, does it? Stop calling him a drunkard without realizing the idiocy of the current administration that promised a quike war which has become a loss: please don't tell me we are WINNING when clearly we can't secure a country such as Iraq...

Deep



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 11:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by John bull 1
Couldn't resist. Our Kennedy, Charles Kennedy, leader of the Liberal Democrats and commanding aproximately 25% UK support and rising, is on the same page as your Kennedy.

Must be an international kennedy conspiracy, the IKC. JFK must've not really been killed, he just went 'underground' to direct this clandestine operation.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
We have an invited outpost in friendly territory. That's hardly
an invasion and occupying force that has taken over and kept
the oil fields.

No but they are inplace to make any move quite easy.
Besides they couldnt have stayed to the same exstent that they can now since there was a UN task force there.


[edit on 27-1-2005 by devilwasp]



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 12:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
We are there. We have to
finish the job. Turn the country over to the Iraqi's
and let them run it. THEN we can get the hell out.
If the insurgents had half a brian, which obviously
they don't, they'd understand this and let the elections
take place and they'd stop blowing things up so we
could get the hell out and leave the Iraqis to sort out
their own country for the first time in 40 years.


Spoon fed pipe dreams you suffer from my friend, i bet you enjoy watching plenty of FOX/CNN news.

Did you know that Abdul-Aziz Al Hakim, who is the leader of the supreme council for Islamic revolution in Iraq is heavily in favor of winning the Iraqi elections. Much like our own president, he also has an agenda that comprises mainly of two objectives;

1. Kick the US out of Iraq

2. Shiite majority government in Iraq to form alliance with Iranian ayatollahs/Terhan.

Like i said, you're living a pipe dream if you believe the Bush administration spent billions in this Iraq war that benefits their enemies in Iran.


[edit on 27-1-2005 by syntaxer]



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 01:44 PM
link   
May be we should gather killer bees to send over to Iraq, I hear they do a wonderful job attacking people. We could train these little army to sting these little insurgents to death. lol
Reality check, Edward, go into rehab please.

Devilwasp:
Why do we need their oil Devilwasp? We have so much capped oil in this country that you do not know about. You go by too much of the media tv and the newspaper, or other sources. We do not have to depend on oil from other countries like your England. Go fly a kite.



[edit on 27-1-2005 by GI_WOLVES]



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 01:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZeroDeep
The U.N is best suited to handle this reconstruction, not the U.S

I was under the impression that the UN had a history of ineffectiveness in a situation like this?



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 02:04 PM
link   
Then who else would you suggest to propound an effective form Democracy in Iraq? The U.N, like many other forums of dialouge, does not have a concrete track record, however, thier countenance towards peace and stability in the Middle East gives them much more leverage, then, per se, the U.S. --whome, I, personaly, don't trust in that country. We've seen thier political clout in other countries and it's not been very good.

With the current reform changes coupled with the hope that the major veto holders in the U.N continue to support efforts made by the U.N. to stabalize Iraq, we may see a bastion of light where not light has shone before.

Deep

*I'm just trying to be optimistic*



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 02:07 PM
link   
Anyone know how the meeting went between Bill Gates, Bono, and Toney Blair??????????? I hear they were talking about Africa?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join