It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
This is the absolute worst of his picks so far. It's a slap in the face.
Has there been a good one?
Cuz I haven't seen it.
Not that I can see so far... True. I already was pissed over Carson yesterday, because my current work includes working with Hud-related topics.
“It’s great because you have these people who don’t want to work and need the uplifting hand of God,” Carson stated to the press. “They will build a biblically based structure. Then they live in it. They will store their flour, oats or whatever just like Egyptians did.” www.patheos.com...
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
This is just another reason Electors should stand up and perform their duty to protect the country against such an unqualified and destructive President-Elect, by casting their vote for someone other than Trump.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
This is the absolute worst of his picks so far. It's a slap in the face.
Has there been a good one?
Cuz I haven't seen it.
Not that I can see so far... True. I already was pissed over Carson yesterday, because my current work includes working with Hud-related topics.
I'm a major supporter of separation of church and state.
So, you can imagine I'm not thrilled either.
Would HUD turn down an Atheist? (I know that sounds like a ridiculous question, but . . . in reality I don't think it is)
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
This is just another reason Electors should stand up and perform their duty to protect the country against such an unqualified and destructive President-Elect, by casting their vote for someone other than Trump.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: projectvxn
Don't be too harsh...just yet.
“Scientists continue to disagree about the degree and extent of global warming and its connection to the actions of mankind,” he wrote in National Review earlier this year. “That debate should be encouraged — in classrooms, public forums, and the halls of Congress. It should not be silenced with threats of prosecution. Dissent is not a crime.”
www.nytimes.com...
The vast majority of "peer-reviewing" scientists see the data as conclusive.
Also, this AG has also sued the government over basic environmental regulations.
He's an ally of big oil and gas.
The absolute worst choice almost to head to EPA.
It's a slap in the face to not only us, but the planet.
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
This is the absolute worst of his picks so far. It's a slap in the face.
Has there been a good one?
Cuz I haven't seen it.
Not that I can see so far... True. I already was pissed over Carson yesterday, because my current work includes working with Hud-related topics.
I'm a major supporter of separation of church and state.
So, you can imagine I'm not thrilled either.
Would HUD turn down an Atheist? (I know that sounds like a ridiculous question, but . . . in reality I don't think it is)
Do you mean because he is a Christian?
And they don't have religious tests for housing. But, some landlords with section 8 voucher holders do discriminate on various things, which is a problem.
All of the world’s energy sources will be needed to meet rising demand to 2040, but there will be a marked shift toward cleaner fuels, particularly natural gas.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: spiritualzombie
From this article, what Pruitt said was exactly right. This debate needs to be had, especially before committing to massive and expensive agreements.
originally posted by: pteridine
So if you, personally, don't like the election results, the electors should cast their vote for someone other than Trump? Where were you when the unqualified Obama was elected? Who would you suggest that the electors vote for? Pay-for-play Hillary and the Clinton Crime Family?
originally posted by: projectvxn
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: spiritualzombie
From this article, what Pruitt said was exactly right. This debate needs to be had, especially before committing to massive and expensive agreements.
I think we need to let scientists and engineers lead on this and take the politics out of it as much as is possible.
So far allowing politicians to grandstand on climate change has netted nothing but a tax scheme that benefits politicians and corporations who can afford to pollute.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Kettu
Considering Obama dismantled NASA only to leave them with the jobs of raising Islam awareness, and studying climate change, I'd say that whole agenda was a swamp of itself.
And a bayou arguably could be a vehicle to drain a swamp.