Strange anomalies on Comet 67P!

a reply to: MCL1150

Here's an interesting article on your comet.

It sings...

www.space.com...

a reply to: MCL1150


I found in my profile the path to the thread I mentioned "Rethinking Comets."
But I can't show the link.

originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: MCL1150


I found in my profile the path to the thread I mentioned "Rethinking Comets."
But I can't show the link.

Does this link work?:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

pareidolia building a skyscraper on a comet would be like building one on a iceberg

a reply to: MagicCow

One that likes to be constantly on the move?

Anywhere between 12 miles a second to 40 apparently.

One that does not think like humans and finds it a suitable enviroment.

A comet is not a suitable environment, see second last response.

Also last one - a moron that would want very very smart people to think it's a comet..

If that was the case with this comet then Rosetta would not have been put there so publicly.

I mean - wouldn't a comet be a fantastic "natural" retrofitted satellite?

Apart from the fact comets are very unpredictable, they can shed hundred of tons of material and gas every second, I wouldn't recommend it.

Get off that high horse of yours...It's much too high.

Feels just the right height to me

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

You know you haven't said anything that doesn't
come from a human intelligence.
Suitable to who? YOU?
Who are you? What do you matter?
It was done publicly because all things are
done in the open for us to see and ignore (which we commonly do).
Comets are unpredictable to US - Humans....
Once again you're trying to apply a human intelligence on
something alien.
If science has taught us anything - it's taught us that we don't know anything.
It's good to see arrogance can be so affirming.

You guys caught me. I visited that comet last year and threw one helluva party.

I remember reading about this comet singing! a reply to: MagicCow

I remember reading about this comet singing! a reply to: MagicCow

originally posted by: MagicCow
a reply to: MCL1150

Here's an interesting article on your comet.

It sings...

www.space.com...

The comet does not sing in any way shape or form. That claim is based on the most egregious dictionary abuse I've seen all month. Not only are the signals they are talking about not any form of sound, but even if they were sound which they are not, they are far outside any range of audibility that could be considered song. Humans can hear something like 20 Hertz to 20,000 Hertz and the frequency of that "noise" is only 40 milliHertz, not even remotely close to an audible frequency.

Scientists with ESA transformed the magnetometer data into sounds that can human ears can hear, and the result is a strange clicking noise that changes in pitch and tempo.

Even after the conversion of non-sound signals into sound which is then no longer anything like what the comet is doing, I wouldn't refer to a "strange clicking noise" noise as "singing", that's lame. The least they could do is put the "sound" in quotes like NASA did to indicate it's not really sound.

It's an interesting phenomenon without all the mischaracterization because apparently the physics involved isn't well understood, but I think we understand it well enough to say it's probably not aliens.

originally posted by: MagicCow
a reply to: Zcustosmorum

You know you haven't said anything that doesn't
come from a human intelligence.
Suitable to who? YOU?
Who are you? What do you matter?
It was done publicly because all things are
done in the open for us to see and ignore (which we commonly do).
Comets are unpredictable to US - Humans....
Once again you're trying to apply a human intelligence on
something alien.
If science has taught us anything - it's taught us that we don't know anything.
It's good to see arrogance can be so affirming.

You've gone off in some tangent and I think I'm losing your transmission

Comets aren't completely alien to us because we know what they are and in general, what they consist of. It's specifically what happens to them through space that we don't know, hence the mission of Rosetta.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

"PROBABLY"

Being the operative word.
We just don't know.
Just being an advocate of the dark one.
It's interesting regardless of it's source.

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Can we agree to agree - that we don't know?
Some things look odd.
You see rocks - others don't and are interested.
No one is trying to win you over.
You came across as some sort of authority
and in essence called anyone who thought otherwise
a moron.
You can't apply human intelligence to something alien.
We as a collective here on ATS try to think tank it.
We do this because we don't know.
We're not all as gifted as you.
Don't back peddle now.

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Secondly, what are the odds of Rosetta landing on a comet that some alien civilization had also built something on?

odds ? You are joking of course...

What are the "odds" of sentient life springing forth ?

What are the "odds" of drawing flush royale in a poker game ?

What are the "odds" of getting struck by a lightning ?

All very very very small....yet...

I agree with you 100%
Who knows what’s in the mind of an Alien race. Comet 67P could very well be a beacon, a marker for space travel. To humans it seems impossible and makes no sense but to an alien civilization that’s a million years ahead of us in technology probably knows exactly what they are doing. a reply to: MagicCow

originally posted by: MagicCow
a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Can we agree to agree - that we don't know?
Some things look odd.
You see rocks - others don't and are interested.
No one is trying to win you over.
You came across as some sort of authority
and in essence called anyone who thought otherwise
a moron.
You can't apply human intelligence to something alien.
We as a collective here on ATS try to think tank it.
We do this because we don't know.
We're not all as gifted as you.
Don't back peddle now.

Comets are not alien to us, we may not know everything about them but they are certainly not a total mystery, your points are not valid, and on the basis of what the OP posted, I find it ludicrous.

a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

Did I mention ludicrous there, what the hell are you talking about and what even is your point?

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Thanks to the sentient aliens that created us through
hybridization we're allowed to
have our own opinions on the matter.
Like I said before - you see rocks.
Think people that see differently are morons.
Does that about sum it up?
If so i think our dialogue is pretty much done my friend.

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Did I mention ludicrous there, what the hell are you talking about and what even is your point?

The point is...however small you may feel odds for an event occurring are...it still happens...all the time. Somewhere...to someone.

Statistics of probability is highly speculative game...and without knowing all the variables for an event..."odds" can be highly misleading. Odds only matter if you need to get it at the first try. If you have an endless stream of possibilities of an event occurring...time being a factor...everything happens...sooner or later.

So yeah...aliens building a probe on top of a comet and us landing a probe of our own...absolutely within the realm of possible.

a reply to: MCL1150

I take it you are having a laugh here is the RED area



Rocks rocks and more rocks

Is this a statue and the shadow?