It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who really did the DNC hack?

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 08:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Gothmog

How convenient...

Is that all ya got ?
Oh , wait thats all you ever have..
Convenient . What is convenient ? You being able to post 2 words.
Please expand on your post.




posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   
Most leaks are from inside sources. That's a fact. The timing of Seth Rich's murder suggests it could have been him. Otherwise, it was probably the NSA. Either of these scenarios is vastly more likely than the Russian bogeymen that the Democrats are desperately clinging to.



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Brian4real



my theory is there was no classic 'Hacker' who accessed the DNC or the cabal of high level individuals which gave direction/policy/orders for all subordinates to follow there in the DNC or the connected Think-Tanks to DNC...


the info was in an ongoing compilation of data operation by a faction within the NSA... who were ideologically against the progressives, candidate Clinton in the role of Obama 3rd Term...the Muslim uber Alles attitude in the higher places of government, legislative & executive branches...

the release of sensitive info was to disrupt the conspirator-controllers in the DNC, WH, Deep-State-shadow government


instead of hackers... think in terms of whistle-blowers from covert black-ops, operating as double-agents within Agencies/Departments of the government (big-brother) system

 




timely report that is relevant:

Mass surveillance exposed by Snowden is about control, not counterterrorism
Oliver Stone to RT
Published time: 7 Dec, 2016 09:41
edit on th31148112829507312016 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 06:15 AM
link   
a reply to: St Udio

Thats a point that seems most likely in this case. Essentially, it was a compilation of damning evidence collected by a "rogue" group within the NSA, released at the most opportune time.
I think i lean mostly towards your explanation at this time.
After all, look at the lengths they went to to get Gary McKinnon (the guy who hacked NASA).
To further stregthen your point, who would risk such a 'cyber attack' without fear of repercussions? Unless your the one who does the cyber surveillance.



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 06:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: VinylTyrant
a reply to: Sillyolme

The fact Clinton came out on tv and said it was the Russians tells you it ain't, the Russians. They NEVER TELL YOU TRUTH, do you not learn anything?


edit on 9-12-2016 by Brian4real because: Grammer



Lol! Aint that the truth! Pure and simple!
edit on 9-12-2016 by Brian4real because: Spelling



posted on Dec, 9 2016 @ 06:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Brian4real

Basically, you are saying that there has been a military coup. That explains why Trump has named at least three generals to his cabinet. Dark times.



new topics

top topics
 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join