It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Blame Tories For Ogreave So Corbyn Can Continue His Abuse Cover-Up

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 8 2016 @ 02:51 AM
link   
a reply to: uncommitted

I think you're reading the wrong thread pal.



posted on Dec, 8 2016 @ 04:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: uncommitted

I think you're reading the wrong thread pal.



Definitely not just a labour thing. If anything the background of the tories indicates child abuse. Their schools, their clubs, their practises.


From you on the previous page. I think you must have amnesia.
edit on 8-12-2016 by uncommitted because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2016 @ 08:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: Flavian

Have you ever heard of the term 'faggoting out'?

Have you ever researched the effects of being faggoted out at public school on the mind of a male?

It's not pretty.

I am not generalising about all public schools and pupils within... Only a tight circle. But it DOES go on and it IS a fact.


Faggots were younger students that, effectively, served as batmen to their older peers (cleaned their rooms, got supplies, etc). It didn't refer to buggery. Occasionally this did happen but was between students so is in no way paedophilia - it is either sexual exploration (consenting) or about power over an individual (forced). It also wasn't, despite literary fiction to the contrary, wide spread (the abuse side, not the use of faggots). Believe it or not, buggery is not something that was encouraged!



posted on Dec, 10 2016 @ 03:20 AM
link   
a reply to: uncommitted

What? I'm completely being open about it being both parties?

I'm really confused by your approach.



posted on Dec, 10 2016 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: uncommitted

What? I'm completely being open about it being both parties?

I'm really confused by your approach.


You suggested it was more inherent in the Tory party, I'm not sure how you can read what you wrote and not see that, but never mind.




 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join