It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump is winning...again...SoftBank will invest $50 billion in the US, aiming to create 50,000 jobs

page: 5
66
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Indigo5

Take the money reality is any investment in the US market from any foreign entity only help's. If Softbank wants to invest 500 billion in the US market shut up and say thank you.


And holy crap...again..it is not 500B it is 50B....arranged before the election.

Tell me when and where that "pledged" money goes, how it will ever create 50k jobs and I might respond to your nonsense...

Hint..It's a joint investment fund with Saudi Arabia targeting emerging tech...Start ups in silicon valley...That should make coal miners in Tennessee pleased as punch.
edit on 7-12-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-12-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

No the details have not been released everyone is speculating unless you have something concrete to tie the saudi deal to this. As I said there is nothing showing where the 500 billion is coming from. But even if 30 billion of the 500 is coming from Saudi arabia so what. Oh and just do you know I read those articles all ready none have any facts and just speculation. What is known is a Taiwan I vestments bank is also involved nothing about Saudi arabia.

And funny that same fund you claim from October is this one means it grew huge in only a little over a month that doesn't happen ok. Investment funds are set at the beginning for examplease I set aside 1 million you don't later add to it you create a new one. Investments are in themselves contracts you don't change the terms of the contracts that's dangerous as far as taxes and even making money. So October they set up a 100 billion 70 billion from softbank and 30 from the saudis. There not just going to expand this one to 500 billion that money is all ready allocated. What they can do is sell anything that deal has and invest it in to the new fund. I find that option unlikely but they could 500 billion is a lot of money.

Now do you have any evidence if them folding the Oct deal in to this one other than speculation that is specifically being done to bash Trump??? Yeah I thought not until we get the specifics of the deal trying to say the funds are from saudis is like trying to say there from aliens both are just as likely lol.

Oh and the articles you posted all have one source the wall street journal. And in the article they admit they are speculating. Because softbank has huge resources and could indeed make a 50 billion dollar investment on there own. In fact in another WSJ article they claim exactly that and that it will be spent in a merger for t mobile . Again this is speculation. So I ask again any facts?? Because if your sure I can make money on my investments so please show me
edit on 12/7/16 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 02:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Indigo5

No the details have not been released everyone is speculating unless you have something concrete to tie the saudi deal to this. As I said there is nothing showing where the 500 billion is coming from.


50B not 500B...for the 3rd time.
AND YES..it is the fund set up with the Saudi's in October..If you think the WSJ and Teaparty.org are both lying to you (2 of the links I provided) I can't help whatever is wrong with your mind.




So October they set up a 100 billion 70 billion from softbank and 30 from the saudis. There not just going to expand this one to 500 billion that money is all ready allocated. What they can do is sell anything that deal has and invest it in to the new fund. I find that option unlikely but they could 500 billion is a lot of money.


My god...what is wrong with you? My last three posts have pointed out that it is not 500B it's 50B?

It's not even trolling by you...it's bizzare.
edit on 7-12-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-12-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Indigo5

No the details have not been released everyone is speculating unless you have something concrete to tie the saudi deal to this. As I said there is nothing showing where the 500 billion is coming from.


50B not 500B...for the 3rd time.
AND YES..it is the fund set up with the Saudi's in October..If you think the WSJ and Teaparty.org are both lying to you (2 of the links I provided) I can't help whatever is wrong with your mind.




So October they set up a 100 billion 70 billion from softbank and 30 from the saudis. There not just going to expand this one to 500 billion that money is all ready allocated. What they can do is sell anything that deal has and invest it in to the new fund. I find that option unlikely but they could 500 billion is a lot of money.


My god...what is wrong with you? My last three posts have pointed out that it is not 500B it's 50B?

It's not even trolling by you...it's bizzare.


Again both are the same article and as I said read the WSJ article the source they are speculating. If the deal was known as fact wall street would all ready be moving on the deal as yet traders cant. Its still a gamble until the details are released. AS far as the amount I was on my cell and apparently it likes to add zeros. heres the deal as of today there is nothing linking the fund from October to this deal other than the WSJ. Many investors have already disregarded this and many are assuming this is an actual investment from Softbank. If this view is correct expect sprint to try to acquire tmobile again. With the announcement from T mobile this seems much more likely than a Saudi investment.

So wall street is already taking the gamble and believe a merger is being set up again. But apparently you hav insider information as to the specifics of the deal not available to investors. Or is it you simply want to have some way to bash anything Trump does doesn't matter if its true or not???
edit on 12/7/16 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

The Softbank/Sprint + T-Mobile merger is a different facet.

Approval of that deal where the Obama admin blocked it is likely the price Trump paid for the PR stunt.

That is different than the Saudi's and Softbank forming an investment fund before the election targeted at acquiring US Tech Companies.

Your reasoning seems tangled and you seem to be randomly just saying things.

I provided links. If my posts offend you, perhaps look up the facts for yourself...But honestly each of your posts are more confusing than the preceding ones and often contradict one another.


edit on 7-12-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 03:12 PM
link   
With Trump, I say:

Wait for the Aftermath.

His mouth is not exactly accurate.



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Trumps the Don u know it. lol
have not read thread lol.
LMAO at lefties soon to be rightees




posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5




The Softbank/Sprint + T-Mobile merger is a different facet.

And an important one perhaps.



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: introvert


This was already in the works before Trump even won the election. This appears to be more theater than anything else.


And note that Saudi money is involved.


Indeed. Could you imagine the reactions this would get if it was Hillary instead of Trump?


Luckily, she isn't president and we won't have to worry about that.


Most people do not like to think about their own hypocrisy, so I can see why they wouldn't worry about it.

Probably because Clinton was working for herself and Trump is working for America!



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zngland
a reply to: Annee

Trumps the Don u know it. lol
have not read thread lol.
LMAO at lefties soon to be rightees



I started out as a Righty.

Then I grew up.



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 05:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee
WTF some are destined for a slap of historic proportions, by the way respect to your primary socialisation cohorts. LYA

Long live the Don



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 05:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zngland
a reply to: Annee
WTF some are destined for a slap of historic proportions, by the way respect to your primary socialisation cohorts. LYA

Long live the Don


Is English your fist language?

You're gonna need to be a bit more clear on your point(s).



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 05:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: rickymouse

Could you have an employee sign a safety waiver on most jobs, or is that not allowed by OSHA or whomever?


Nope, but if things were done properly, you could make the person a partner in your business and then no OSHA rules are required to be needed. Or subcontract the work to the person. That is what lots of businesses are starting to do, sub work to other small businesses. I do not need to follow the OSHA rules if I work alone. I still have to follow the rules that govern quality and follow my license, but being a licensed builder, I cannot sue someone if I get hurt on the job, so I do not even need to pay workers comp on myself. In fact, I couldn't even get workers comp on myself unless I chose to incorporate. I did incorporate for one year and it was a headache, I had so much extra paperwork it sucked. So I went back to a regular business.

I did quite a few roofs in my life, I had to buy the harnesses and all that junk and decided it was too unsafe to start doing that stuff. All it did was add something to trip on. A good roofer works safe.



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

No it isn't but long live the Trumpet


rest assured when you post i always keep my dictionary close and i hope i'm linguistically clear to most ATSers.

enough please lol we must respect thread love ATS








posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 06:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zngland
a reply to: Annee

No it isn't but long live the Trumpet


rest assured when you post i always keep my dictionary close and i hope i'm linguistically clear to most ATSers.

enough please lol we must respect thread love ATS



Thanks. It helps knowing that.

I prefer Merriam Webster, they seem to keep their descriptions simple.

I'll try harder. I do get you support Trump



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 06:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Not possible as yet trump isn't in office and couldn't gurantee a merger even if he was can recommend it though. Until the information on the investment and who is involved everything is just sheer speculation. Thus is 5he point I'm teying to make with you. The 59 billion being invested no details have been given. We have wall street placing bets if you will. Some believe it's going to be in merger accusituons still others believe it's going to be in Internet start ups.

If by some chance you knew the specifics you would stand to make a lot of people alot of money. Unfortunately you don't everything you believe is based off oNE wal street journal article. And there is two others that were written by two different economists with a different theory. You can't take a wall street journal article as gospel first thing you learn in investments. Even they state not to use there information to play stocks. Until the deal goes public which it hasn't we have no idea what softbank is doing. It be like trying to guess what duetch bank was doing.

The only reason you chose this article over the others from the same paper is so you can claim some kind of bad deal was made do to your hatred of Trump. I don't like him either however I see over the next 4 years business should do really well. We are seeing it all ready in stocks which are poised to reach 20000 a new record.



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs



The 2009 Stimulus Package. 787 billion dollars. He was in office less than a month. Against failure.

I take it you don't know there is no way that Obama gave them the money if he was in office for only a month. None of the new Presidents plans start until the next year. The DOE didn't have to even ask him about the money because he who shall not be named set it up that way.



posted on Dec, 8 2016 @ 01:00 AM
link   
Not sure why people b17ch about bringing back jobs. This won't help me but it would help my follow Americans, and that is what matters. Trump is business friendly that is why people can work with him. Obama was anti business, he is a globalists and agenda is to leverage America for control of other countries. He doesn't want to do the things Trump is doing because it would reverse globalism.



posted on Dec, 8 2016 @ 01:11 AM
link   
This is funny that Trump is getting credit for this investment from a Japanese bank.

You guys realize that businesses, especially banks, don't just go to 1 meeting and come out to say I'm going to invest $50 billion.

You would be the worst business person or entity in the world to do something like that with other people's money.

The reality is that Softbank has most likely researched this topic for at least 1 year for this move. The decision was made a long time ago that this was going to happen. But Trump is somehow getting credit for this.

You Trump supporters are too naive.


edit on 8-12-2016 by SeekingAlpha because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 8 2016 @ 01:40 AM
link   
a reply to: SeekingAlpha




This is funny that Trump is getting credit for this investment from a Japanese bank.
You guys realize that businesses, especially banks, don't just go to 1 meeting and come out to say I'm going to invest $50 billion.

SoftBank isn't a bank , it's an acquisitions company.

edit on 8-12-2016 by gortex because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
66
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join