It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: dreamingawake
When you figure out what you are talking about clue the rest of us in because it has nothing to do with my comment as a response to your post.
originally posted by: Kettu
Well, of course he supports it.
He's invested in it.
According to his Public Financial Disclosure Report, Trump has investments worth between $500,000 and $1 million in Dallas-based Energy Transfer Partners, whose subsidiary, Dakota Access, is building the four-state crude oil pipeline.
Link
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: spirit_horse
It is not on Sioux land. It is on private property. It is not going over rivers, but under them.
The tribe wanted $35 million to run through their land. The company decided to go around their land and on private property. Then the protests began.
Best post on this topic ever....
Mods , this deserves an applause
Ah, that gets the dumbass award.
What a gem!
LOL
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: spirit_horse
It is not on Sioux land. It is on private property. It is not going over rivers, but under them.
The tribe wanted $35 million to run through their land. The company decided to go around their land and on private property. Then the protests began.
Best post on this topic ever....
Mods , this deserves an applause
Ah, that gets the dumbass award.
What a gem!
LOL
Name calling - yep that shows an extreme lack of intellectual ability
And , careful , your extreme ignorance on the subject is showing
The Native Americans Do Not own the land.
There are app 300 more pipelines on the same route.
They wanted millions to put the pipeline on the property
This was the only pipeline of hundreds protested.
Now , who gets your illustrious award now ?
Looks as if you get your own award
I am done with you
next
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: spirit_horse
It is not on Sioux land. It is on private property. It is not going over rivers, but under them.
The tribe wanted $35 million to run through their land. The company decided to go around their land and on private property. Then the protests began.
Best post on this topic ever....
Mods , this deserves an applause
Ah, that gets the dumbass award.
What a gem!
LOL
Name calling - yep that shows an extreme lack of intellectual ability
And , careful , your extreme ignorance on the subject is showing
The Native Americans Do Not own the land.
There are app 300 more pipelines on the same route.
They wanted millions to put the pipeline on the property
This was the only pipeline of hundreds protested.
Now , who gets your illustrious award now ?
Looks as if you get your own award
I am done with you
next
Where's your sources? That pipeline goes under river that sources their drinking water. You do not understand. Also, going under is quite possibly more dangerous than over.
Blabbing but making no sense. Brush up on the topic because that is beyond ignorant. All this because of blind Trump support.
Speaking of name calling you sure do it to members but have a problem when it comes full circle? Need a safety pin?
originally posted by: spirit_horse
It is not on Sioux land. It is on private property. It is not going over rivers, but under them.
The tribe wanted $35 million to run through their land. The company decided to go around their land and on private property. Then the protests began.
originally posted by: Nickn3
a reply to: spirit_horse
I was very divided on the issue, and I wanted the pipeline rerouted.
Then I found out about the pipeline being on private land and not touching the reservation. After further investigation, it looks like the Native Americans wants much wampum for nothing. A sad state of affairs.
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: dreamingawake
When you figure out what you are talking about clue the rest of us in because it has nothing to do with my comment as a response to your post.
Huh, okay you are saying Liberal/Democrat therefore it is why Swills and I have I no idea what we're talking about. I'm not, not sure about him.
Plus the pipeline going under the river poses a threat. Do you have sources of it not doing such?
originally posted by: odzeandennz
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: Swills
The oil company is encroaching on Sioux land
Please show exactly what Sioux land it is being built on.
Unless.....
yea, their lands were taken centuries ago whilst they were massacred.
originally posted by: everyone
The claim is the pipe could burst. Have they researched and delivered any evidence with projections of probability for this before they protested for this? Because that is extremely unlikely since we have age old pipelines under the u.s everywhere.
Sunoco Logistics (SXL.N), the future operator of the oil pipeline delayed this month after Native American protests in North Dakota, spills crude more often than any of its competitors with more than 200 leaks since 2010, according to a Reuters analysis of government data.
originally posted by: everyone
2.They only started protesting when they decided to go around them.