It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

First Day Of Wisconsin Recount Nets Hillary One Vote

page: 1
34
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+18 more 
posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 08:50 AM
link   


The first day of Wisconsin’s presidential recount narrowed the gap between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President-elect Donald Trump by precisely one vote.

Trump defeated Clinton in Wisconsin’s initial tally by about one percent, or just over 22,000 votes. Nevertheless, Green Party candidate Jill Stein (who finished a very distant fourth) is demanding a full recount after suggesting fraud or technological glitches may have swayed the results. In response to Stein’s demand, Wisconsin began recounting all its ballots Thursday.

First Day Of Wisconsin Recount Nets Hillary One Vote

The 2016 election is the gift that keeps on giving...

Watching Hillary and her supporters flail and whine over losing is fan freaking tastic...

I can only hope they continue to press for recounts and continue the tears parade because this is better than the cowboys winning 11 straight...

So please keep it up progressives because this is priceless and of unending entertainment [for me]...

-Christosterone
edit on 2-12-2016 by Christosterone because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 08:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

Was it cast by a computer in Russia?


+19 more 
posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: seasonal




posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Christosterone
a reply to: seasonal





I found that humorous.



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   
Going to end up at $1 million a vote at that rate.
But who didn't see that coming?


+3 more 
posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Christosterone

Was it cast by a computer in Russia?


Nope. Dead guy.


(post by Stevenjames15 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:26 AM
link   
What matters is how many votes Stein netted since she was the one who requested the recount, and the article says they found 17 extra votes for Stein. This seems a bit high and it's only day 1.

Maybe the money spent on the recount wasn't such a waste and will lead to arrests like it happened in the 2004 recount.

edit on 2-12-2016 by BlueShaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

Now that Hillary has breached her promise of accepting Trump victory - I guess its all in and ok for prosecuring Hillary?



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

From the link:



Only Menominee County, home to the Menominee Indian Reservation, fully reported its recounted results on the first day. It found 17 extra votes for Stein and 12 for Libertarian Gary Johnson, while removing two votes from Trump and one from Clinton.


Uh...what's with the third party candidate totals? Now that does seem like some BS.

I voted for Johnson and my vote better have counted!



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Money well spent so far...

lol.



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:34 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:40 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:42 AM
link   
How many days will this recount business take anyway?

Hillary could overcome Trump's lead in 21,999 days if this trend continues

edit on -060009am12kam by Ohanka because: (no reason given)

edit on -060009am12kam by Ohanka because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone


Trump defeated Clinton in Wisconsin’s initial tally by about one percent, or just over 22,000 votes.

One vote per day? Only 22,000 more to go.


+4 more 
posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:55 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 09:58 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 10:36 AM
link   
Thank you kindly.

The post I quoted also demonstrates another problem that the left leaning liberal movement must address. Everything comes across as a personal statement of anger which turns off moderate and purposeful thinkers. The constructive vitriol that spawned rights movements and changed the world was collective and focused and through that became so much more than the some of its parts. The personal anger of the modern democrat voter has the complete opposite effect and detracts from any well meaning ideology, effectively diluting and marginalising the argument.

Deciding your stand point and arguing from a position of personal rage almost always results in a poor advocacy and a weakened proposition.
a reply to: Christosterone



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 10:39 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 10:52 AM
link   
a reply to: CulturalResilience

Well said! Couldn't have said it better!

JT



new topics

top topics



 
34
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join