It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That's all well and good I suppose?
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: loveguy
Because they want to be given credit, they want pats on the back...Jolly good show chap kind of stuff they need...
Afterwards Roe threatened, "watch how I make these malcontents famous anytime someone searches their name."
originally posted by: CardDown
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: Sublimecraft
TBH I think Roe and his co-dependent Lukes are incredibly childish and this is just a UFOlogy war that erupts quite regularly in the field, Sadly for them they picked the wrong person to mess with.
Reading their posts is like reading a a high school fight over christ only knows what teenagers battle each other on.
Isaac should ignore them, but no one can tell him what to do.
I started to reply to this earlier, but it grew beyond post length.
There's a lot more to Erica Lukes' role in this.
Erica Lukes, Ted Roe and the Attack on Isaac Koi
originally posted by: CardDown
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: Sublimecraft
TBH I think Roe and his co-dependent Lukes are incredibly childish and this is just a UFOlogy war that erupts quite regularly in the field, Sadly for them they picked the wrong person to mess with.
Reading their posts is like reading a a high school fight over christ only knows what teenagers battle each other on.
Isaac should ignore them, but no one can tell him what to do.
I started to reply to this earlier, but it grew beyond post length.
There's a lot more to Erica Lukes' role in this.
Erica Lukes, Ted Roe and the Attack on Isaac Koi
I was wondering the same thing, but I'm not sure if I would trust Roe to be good for his word to not out Isaac. It wasn't so much one specific sentence but the abundance of small inferences like his talking about the pictures, why does he even need to bring those up if not some kind of veiled threat about outing Isaac?
originally posted by: Bspiracy
If roe claims to not have threatened and also repeatedly claims it would be wrong to out isaac, what is the curreny issue other than s bunch of narcissists parading on facebook?
originally posted by: IsaacKoi
Just to make it clear that I quoted Ted Roe _exactly_ when I quit ufology due to statements by him (which many of you know already because you followed his posts at the time), I've added footnotes to my farewell/resignation statement which cross-references each and every single point I said in that statement to 100+ pages of exhibited screen shots (with links for anyone to verify those exhibited screen shots).
I've done this because Ted Roe has now said that he doesn't think I "have any integrity" and have lied. (He has also complained about the lack of support he is getting...).
Look, Ted Roe has won and I've left ufology - but his current nonsense is just rubbing salt into my wounds.
www.isaackoi.com...
Goodbye: I seem to have greatly annoyed Ted Roe about a month ago when I posted a brief comment on Facebook about his new IAUPR group [_FOOTNOTE 1_]. Without wanting to bother you all with the details, he has subsequently posted on various Facebook pages attacking my use of a pseudonym (referring to me as a "fictional entity" [_FOOTNOTE 2_],"it" [_FOOTNOTE 3_] and posting "Who the # is Isaac Koi and why won't he comply w the standards we do" [_FOOTNOTE 4_]). The relevant Facebook pages include his own page and the one at the link below [_FOOTNOTE 5_] (among others [_FOOTNOTE 6_]):
www.facebook.com...
In the context of these posts on various Facebook pages, Ted Roe posted about "my guys" [_FOOTNOTE 7_] being at the CNES event I attended in Paris a couple of years ago (where I had the pleasure of meeting with Jacques Vallee, Richard Haines and various others - including quite a few members of the EuroUFO email List) and there being _"pics"_ [_FOOTNOTE 8_]. Since the relevant meeting was held on the basis that everyone was entitled to preserve their anonymity if they wished, I had expected that any photos that include me would not be made public - but it looks like I may have been too trusting.
Even more worryingly to me, given my concern not to have clients know about my interest in ufology in case this adversely affects my income, he has now posted today - after various people were kind enough to support me in the relevant discussion on Facebook (including Edoardo Russo [_FOOTNOTE 9_], Curt Collins [_FOOTNOTE 10_], Rich Hoffman [_FOOTNOTE 11_], Paul Dean [_FOOTNOTE 12_] and others [_FOOTNOTE 13_]) - called those supporting me "little butt sucking followers" [_FOOTNOTE 14_] and said "just watch how I make these malcontents famous anytime someone searches their name" [_FOOTNOTE 15_].
It appears to be implied - although not entirely clear - that Ted intends to cause my interest in ufology to appear in search results anytime someone searches my (real) name. Given that Ted knows people that have met me (with Ted repeatedly referring to Jacques Vallee in the relevant posts), he could be in a position to do this.
I'm not willing to take this risk.
I've been prepared to share resources freely with the UFO community for over a decade without asking anything in return, simply seeking to be allowed to participate using a pseudonym to avoid risking any potential damage to my career. The above issues suggest that I cannot do this.
This means that I now probably have to cease active participation in ufology - with effect from today. I am, frankly, rather upset about this.
It's been (mostly) fun, but any potential harm to my career is more important to me.
My wife would kill me if my association with ufology damaged my career. She already had a rather jaundiced view of my bothering to spend time on these issues.
Given Ted Roe's connections, I simply don't see any alternative.
All the best,
Isaac
FOOTNOTE 1 : A screenshot of my brief comment on Facebook in October 2016 about Ted Roe's new IAUPR group is at page 133. (It, and the ensuing comments by Ted Roe, are Exhibit E at pages 132-151)
FOOTNOTE 2 : Ted Roe referred to me as a "fictional entity" in the post copied at page 89 of this PDF.
FOOTNOTE 3 : Ted Roe referred to me as "it" repeatedly, including in the posts copied at page 72
FOOTNOTE 4 : Ted Roe's post "Who the # is Isaac Koi and why won't he comply w the standards we do" is copied at page 43 of this PDF.
FOOTNOTE 5 : The relevant discussion is Exhibit B (copied at pages 80 to 95 of this PDF).
FOOTNOTE 6 : The other relevant discussions include Exhibit A (at pages 5 to 79 of this PDF)
FOOTNOTE 7 : Ted Roe's post referring to "my guys" is copied at page 60 of this PDF.
FOOTNOTE 8 : Ted Roe's post referring to there being "pics" is copied at page 60 of this PDF.
FOOTNOTE 9 : Edoardo Russo's supportive posts include material copied at pages 90-91 of this PDF.
FOOTNOTE 10 : Curt Collins' supportive posts include material copied at page 83
FOOTNOTE 11 : Rich Hoffman's supportive posts include material copied at pages 67-69, 71, 90 and 92 of this PDF.
FOOTNOTE 12 : Paul Dean's supportive posts include material copied at page 95.
FOOTNOTE 13 : Other supportive posts include Exhibit D (at pages 118 to 131) and, indeed, most of the material in the exhibits not written by Ted Roe...
FOOTNOTE 14 : Ted Roe's post referring to those supporting me as "little butt sucking followers" is copied at page 93 of this PDF. See also pages 90 and 92 of this PDF.
FOOTNOTE 15 : Ted Roe's post stating "just watch how I make these malcontents famous anytime someone searches their name" is copied at page 76 of this PDF.
www.isaackoi.com...
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Man, reading through portions of the footnoted .pdf isaac linked, it is clear many people think Ted in the wrong with a few mentioning that it isn't like the Ted they know.
Looks like Ted has a couple of boot lickers sniffing around.
This whole thing smells to high heaven.