It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
After being unexpectedly requested to refuel a CAS (Close Air Support) aircraft targeting a high-level enemy leader, a KC-135 found itself “below bingo.”
Although they usually offload fuel to other aircraft, aerial refuelers may have to take gas from other tankers to extend their “on station time” or to be able to return to their destination, as happened some months ago to a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker over Afghanistan.
The U.S. tanker was in fact involved to a really long mission, so much so it had to be refueled by other KC-135s three times.
According to Lt. Steve Hartig, 350th Air Refueling Squadron pilot, the original task was to refuel two tactical jets flying in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
Nothing special then, besides an initial contact with another KC-135 to get some fuel and extend the mission.
“This was my first deployment as a receiver-qualified pilot,” said Capt. Kirk Evans, 384th ARS pilot in a USAF release. “Receiving fuel from a tanker [at a high altitude was pretty challenging]. The air is thinner, and I had less control authority over the aircraft because the engines are less responsive.”
After completing the operation, the Stratotanker returned to its racetrack and continue its refueling mission.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: iTruthSeeker
It's always interesting to see everyone going on about the next great fighter this, or the next great fighter that, and how much we need this fighter. But as my father used to say, "All those fighters aren't going to do you any good if you can't get them where they need to be".
originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: iTruthSeeker
It's always interesting to see everyone going on about the next great fighter this, or the next great fighter that, and how much we need this fighter. But as my father used to say, "All those fighters aren't going to do you any good if you can't get them where they need to be".
Exactly. That is pretty much it. The guy with the fuel is as important as the mechanic at the motor pool, and so on.
originally posted by: paradoxious
originally posted by: intrptr
Cost, 7 bazillion... all to zap a few Hillbilly Mujahideen, running, at night, around a mosque....
Have you ever said anything positive about anyone doing anything?
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: paradoxious
originally posted by: intrptr
Cost, 7 bazillion... all to zap a few Hillbilly Mujahideen, running, at night, around a mosque....
Have you ever said anything positive about anyone doing anything?
Yah, end unjust wars.
Which requires a perspective in which you are lacking.
Just think for a moment... the people running the US government today were the hippies against Viet Nam in the 60/70's... and they have no issues with things today.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: paradoxious
Which requires a perspective in which you are lacking.
Just think for a moment... the people running the US government today were the hippies against Viet Nam in the 60/70's... and they have no issues with things today.
I live through the Viet Nam 'era' , the same lies were fostered then as now. The hippies as you call them protested endless unjust war then and it ended. Don't balme them for the same mess today, blame the factories for war that are the same ones then and now.
Then you realize that back then, it took a Republican president to get us moving out of Viet Nam, and likely the same to get us out of the quagmire Democrats have created since.