It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
PRIESTS would be forced to report confessions of child sex abuse under controversial draft laws introduced in Parliament yesterday.
The Bill by No Pokies MLC Nick Xenophon requires priests, church workers and all volunteers who work with children to notify authorities of child abuse concerns - including priests receiving confessions.
"It's important that this be across the board; that there be no exceptions to this; that we indicate as a society that culturally it's entirely unacceptable -that there be any form of child abuse," he said.
However, the Opposition said it would not support the part of the Bill relating to church confessions because the "sanctity of the confessional" had been in place for centuries and should not be broken.
The Bill prompted a mixed response from churches, with Anglican Child protection advocate Reverend Don Owers saying "the safety of children over-rides the- seal or confession".
But Catholic Archbishop Philip Wilson and Anglican Archbishop lan George said the privilege of confession was an area of "utmost sanctity" for the church.
"We don't want to step away from carrying out our responsibilities for the protection of children, but at the same time in the Catholic Church there is an absolute ban on priests saying anything that they have heard in confession," Archbishop Wllson said.
Archbishop George said his diocese supported mandatory reporting by the clergy and had acted on that for the past two years - but did not support extending that to the confessional. Both men said any person who confessed a crime to a priesf would be "strenuously encouraged" to give themselves up to police and to receive appropriate treatment.
Mr Xenophon said it was "time to have this debate given the terrible things that have happened within church institutions and other organisations in recent years".
He said the amendment applied to child protection laws only and would not examine whether confessions to other serious offences such as murder should be automatically reported to authorities. However, Opposition Justice spokesman Rob Lawson said requiring priests to report sexual offences would be "the thin edge of the wedge".
"To require priests to report what is given to them in a spiritual sense would be inappropriate," he said.
Mandatory reporting of child abuse by the clergy is one of the recommendations of Robyn Layton's Child Protection Review released earlier this year.
Social Justice Minister Stephanie Key said heads of churches working group was developing a response to the Layton report - including mandatory reporting by the clergy. The Government intended to introduce its own laws in several months.
She did not have a "personal view" on Mr Xenophon's Bill, but was annoyed he did not speak to her about it before its introduction.
Freda Briggs, who was involved In the Hollingworth inquiry into child sex abuse allegations in the Brisbane Anglican diocese, said the requirement should come as a relief to the church.
Originally posted by shmick25
Is it necessary for these criminals to get this information off their chest to someone? Does it make them feel better? Why do they go through a priest and not directly to God? If they tell someone, surely it is ther hearers duty to act on this information!!
So, what are your thoughts on this?
Originally posted by Seapeople
They are supposed to be believers in the Bible. Where in the bible are you told that you need to confess to a preist...and better yet, where does it tell preists that they are not permitted to tell?
STOP USING JESUS CHRIST FOR AN EXCUSE TO BE A NARROW MINDED #^%$&%$*&
Originally posted by AlexofSkye
I'd be interested in hearing from a member who knows, what the
operating code of ethics is for a priest in the position of hearing about a
crime. My guess is they can't tell, but would encourage the individual to
turn themselves in.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
It violates the confessional which is much much
more important than outting the criminal.
If priests started turning in everyone who confessed sins, there would be no more people going to confession. No more people trying to amend their lives through confession.
No more people trying to come closer to
God through the sacrament.
Sure, people can go straight to God. But Catholics have the SACRAMENT
of confession. They have the priest there (much like a psychologist) who
helps them get to the root of why they are acting like they do.
The priest is supposed to offer suggestions and helpful insight into the behavior and sins.
Originally posted by riley
I see no reason why they should be indulged..
Originally posted by FlyersFan
You don't understand the sacrament or sacramental grace.
I doubt you've read what the Catholic church says about why Confession is there, what happens in it (such as the counciling that I mentioned), and the spiritual need for it. It's much easier to point the finger, without hearing both sides of the story, isn't it.
It doesn't change the truth of the sacrament or what happens when a person goes to confession in good faith and conscience.
Originally posted by riley
Originally posted by FlyersFan
I doubt you've read what the Catholic church says about why Confession is there, what happens in it .
I was raised Catholic actually..
Originally posted by FlyersFan
That doesn't mean that you understand the spirituality of Confession.
Most Catholics I know don't understand their faith at all. However,
you think you have the facts and you think you have made a good
choice.... like I said .... whatever.
Confession should (and will) stay as it is. That is the correct thing for it. For any government to force a break in the sanctity of the confessional would be an extreme violation of people's rights
It's more important that they are moved to turn themselves
in AND that they receive sacramental grace and repentance at the
same time.
No, not exactly. I think people are arguing that if you knew someone who sacrificied someones house pet, and said nothing for whatever reasons (friendship, religion) and then this man went out and did it again, then you shouldnt be held accountable for his actions.
Originally posted by Seapeople
I am creating a new set of beliefs. I want to worship a god by sacrificing peoples house pets. According to your sick and dimented point of view....if I declare its a religion...then it is ok...
Pretty insane, good thing we have laws here in America that allow this not to happen. Also, note how nobody said this was okay.
Let me murder someone and claim it is my religious beliefs. HOW INSANE ARE PEOPLE WHO DEFEND THIS LINE OF CRAP????
It's not such a black and white issue. The priest is not all-knowing, he may have thought that the man would truly repent of his sins. He did take a bit of a gamble, but im not so sure I would have done differently in his situation. I would most likely have gone home and looked at statistics of repeat pedofile offenders and weighed in the probability that he would do this again, and then come to my conclusion (whatever it may be), but I cant blame the priest for his actions or think he is sick and demented, he is a person like us, after all.
That preist should go to jail. Stop trying to defend his criminal actions. Think about the innocent child. Where was god protecting that kid while the sick pig was raping him? God listened to the man say he was sorry....and allowed it to go on. So did the preist. Sick.
Originally posted by Kriz_4
Religion is not above the law.
Originally posted by Seapeople
... And to that person who insulted me by saying I am anti catholic (really, you need to pay more attention).
But since you defend religion, I have a thought experiment to show you just how stupid you really are.