It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Judeo-Christianity Conspiracy: If Exposed, World Would Convert to Atheism

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 26 2005 @ 05:02 PM
link   
Greetings,

Professor John Hartung got his Ph.D. in Anthropology from Harvard University, he is currently an Associate Professor of Anesthesiology at the State University of New York, and is the Associate Editor of the Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. His publications are in medicine and social science.

Professor Hartung has studied the history of Judeo-Christianity and has exposed many conspiracies, such as the original religious texts and how many unappealing messages were intentionally hidden when translated into other languages. For example, the original Old Testament supported polytheism, genocide of all non-Jews, and many other aspects that are hidden from contemporary Christianity. Anyway, here is his research: members.aol.com... I would suggest reading everything on this site because it all links together.

Regards.

[edit on 26-1-2005 by Ludwig Beethoven]




posted on Jan, 26 2005 @ 05:26 PM
link   
"Then Judas the Iscariot, one [of] his disciples, and the one who would betray him, said, 'Why was this oil not sold for three hundred days' wages and given to the poor?' He said this not because he cared about the poor but because he was a THIEF and held the money bag and used to steal the contributions."

in another chapter

"Jesus answered them, 'Did I not choose you twelve? Yet is not one of you a devil?' He was referring to Judas, son of Simon the Iscariot; it was he who would betray him, one of the Twelve."



posted on Jan, 26 2005 @ 05:39 PM
link   
In my humblest of humble opinions:

1st Flaw:

Christian:
- Catholic
- Protestant (lots of weirdness in here, and more factions than the African ethnic spectrum)

- Orthodox

Since , these faiths , though sharing some textes, interpret them differently , and give focus on some aspects depending on their cultural background (which truly define religion and not the opposite), are clearly different, sometimes, in actions (and statements), more different amongst themselvs , sometimes more similar to other faiths, it is really shady, to lump them all together as "Christians".


2nd Flaw:

Judeo-Christian: The lumping of these two, is also incorrect, it would make as much sense as saying Judeo-Muslim, or Catholico-Buddhist, or Orthodoxo-Zoroastrian , Animist-Baalist, and if you include phony revivalists Judeo - Cult-of-the-Solar-Temple-give-me-all-your-money-and-then-come-die-with-me-burning-in-this-nice-Swiss-chateau.

But, if someone wants to use Judeo-Scientologic, i won't say a word




posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 12:44 AM
link   
I believe hes saying Judeo-christian because Judaism is the Grand father of christianity.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 01:47 AM
link   
It's a known fact and pretty much accepted as hard truth that the majority of college & university professors are extremely left wing. The left wing is anti-religion of all sorts except islam for some reason.
If a prof is making a statement about religion you can pretty much just ignore it cause its going to be extremely biased.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 02:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by BattleofBatoche
It's a known fact and pretty much accepted as hard truth that the majority of college & university professors are extremely left wing. The left wing is anti-religion of all sorts except islam for some reason.
If a prof is making a statement about religion you can pretty much just ignore it cause its going to be extremely biased.


They only like Islam post-9/11 since they killed a bunch of Americans.



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 03:10 AM
link   
If the Judeo-Christianity Conspiracy(though I doubt there's any conspiracy with all due respect)is expose,I don't think you'll be seeing nuns running around shouting "I'm free!" or anything like that.No matter what happens,those truly faithful ones will always hold their religion close to them no matter what.It's a matter of faith actually.Faith keeps someone's trust to God everlasting.

Personally,In the age of science and modernisation,such things like a well-read person,or in this case a professor,digging deep into history and finding a shred of evidence about a religion conspiracy or some sort are bound to happen.So just take it as an opinion if you want and keep your religion or take it as the truth and renounce your faith altogether.

As the saying goes:I rather believe in a religion that is false than to have no religion at all(or something like that..haha!).

Peace!



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 08:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ludwig Beethoven
Greetings,

Professor John Hartung got his Ph.D. in Anthropology from Harvard University, he is currently an Associate Professor of Anesthesiology at the State University of New York, and is the Associate Editor of the Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. His publications are in medicine and social science.

Just curious, why cite this? He's a professional anesthesiologist and also an ameteur religion researcher. What do his anesthesiolgy credentials have to do with it?


pao

posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 10:43 AM
link   
helps put you to sleep



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 11:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by pao
helps put you to sleep

LMAO! good one


members.aol.com... gives me a 404 error, so i cannot read anyhting about it.


For example, the original Old Testament supported polytheism, genocide of all non-Jews, and many other aspects that are hidden from contemporary Christianity.

Well, Abraham had 2 wifes, and slept with 4 women (at least) to create the 12 tribes of Isreal, which also created Jesus. But in no way does it endose polygapmy since it wasn't the happiest of households (except for maybe Abraham)

Put any scholar worth his credibility will not just comb for verses that contradict eachother without reading the whole thing and comparing them to eachother.

Most people who want to disprove anything first have to attempt to prove it to be reliable



posted on Jan, 27 2005 @ 12:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jehosephat

Originally posted by pao
helps put you to sleep

LMAO! good one


members.aol.com... gives me a 404 error, so i cannot read anyhting about it.


For example, the original Old Testament supported polytheism, genocide of all non-Jews, and many other aspects that are hidden from contemporary Christianity.

Well, Abraham had 2 wifes, and slept with 4 women (at least) to create the 12 tribes of Isreal, which also created Jesus. But in no way does it endose polygapmy since it wasn't the happiest of households (except for maybe Abraham)



You forgot he only had two sons, and the second one by a slave and that one is suppoused to be the one that end up in Mecca and the link to the arab nations to Abraham. Remember also that he was to father many nations and that is how is perceived by the Arabs.




top topics



 
0

log in

join