It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Modern Era Super Villains Will Be Dying SOON!

page: 2
17
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:15 AM
link   
a reply to: AlphaIron

I think it's probably more to do with a psychologically reluctant acknowledgement of 'better the devil you know'...the replacements may be even worse than the current lot.




posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:18 AM
link   
a reply to: MysterX



If a cartel of stone age people controlled all the stones, the Bronze age would never have happened and we'd all still be using flint tools...and typing on..erm..flint computers..ahem.


Indeed, much like how if the native Brits didn't kick the Romans out all those years ago...

Oh wait, they did.

And oh wait, they went backwards...



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:19 AM
link   
The .01% - the few dozen people who control almost every single resource and form of wealth on the planet have been around as long as society has.

The names change ( to varying degrees over time - some surnames staying on the list for centuries, others being diluted out ) but they're always there and there will always be a conflict of interests between them and the other 99.99% of us.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Winstonian

I'm a firm believer that Brexit and Trump winning were huge middle fingers shown to Soros and the rest of the vile globalists. We the world people are SICK AND TIRED of warring, we're sick and tired of being told how to think. We want to live our lives without a third party dictating how we do so behind closed doors.

Thanks for posting Winstonian, top notch.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hefficide

The .01% - the few dozen people who control almost every single resource and form of wealth on the planet have been around as long as society has.

The names change ( to varying degrees over time - some surnames staying on the list for centuries, others being diluted out ) but they're always there and there will always be a conflict of interests between them and the other 99.99% of us.


Absolutely. Don't worry they have succession plans and others to take their place. Soros has a son ready to go who's just as nuts as him...
In future they'll probably use genetic engineering to live for 200 years or get a body transplant. Imagine 200 year old Dick Cheney with a 30 year olds body. Now that's a bad nightmare lol.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Only temporaily...we then went on to have an even larger empire than those amateur Romans. In fact, the largest empire the world has ever known.

Ha!





posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Winstonian

Look at your own list. The youngest person on it, is 69 years of age. The eldest is 101.

Thirty two years between these two, and ALL the people you mention can afford multiple organ transplants, the very best medical technology and know how, round the clock care... their money makes them powerfully protected against age and decrepitude that would fell less sturdily supported individuals.

There is no reason to suspect for a moment, that Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill, could not achieve the same ripeness of age that Rockefeller has. Thirty years and change more of them?? And remember the eldest of your examples is not yet dead, could live for a decade more if he is lucky. The damage that could be done by that man in one year boggles the mind, and yet Hillary could reach his age, as could Bill...imagine the damage those two will be responsible for by the time they are in the extreme end of their dotage?

No, I would not doubt that these individuals could live much longer yet, and science is already preparing for cryogenics and the appalling potential that has for prolonging the lives of those who take and do not give.

Also, those who are recommending you turn your attention to Elon Musk....

Please, get a grip folks. Elon Musk is trying to hand us the future, not take it from us.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 07:00 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit




Please, get a grip folks. Elon Musk is trying to hand us the future, not take it from us.


Well said.

Agree 100%. If those gits we're talking about had 1% of Mr. Musk's vision, the world would be a much better place IMO.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 07:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Winstonian

Ah don't worry guy. There are plenty of up-and-coming rich people for you to whine about in the next so many decades.
We got:
Bill Gates - 61
Mark Zuckerberg - 32
Elon Musk - 45
Barack Obama - 55
Michelle Obama - 52
Chelsea Clinton - 36



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: MysterX

No thanks to the Germans, Normans and god knows who else though!



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 07:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Touche' my colonial friend...oops.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 07:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: TrueBrit




Please, get a grip folks. Elon Musk is trying to hand us the future, not take it from us.


Well said.

Agree 100%. If those gits we're talking about had 1% of Mr. Musk's vision, the world would be a much better place IMO.

Honestly, yes. The only thing wrong with Elon Musk is he's not very good at actually running a business profitably, so he had to affix himself to Obama's rear end to obtain the government support he needs to keep his companies afloat. Under a Trump administration, Musk's future looks dim. Not because Trump will work against him, but just due to a lack of active support. He's already been forced to merge Solar City into Tesla to keep Solar City from collapsing under the weight of its debt.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 07:25 AM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

The beautiful thing about Elon Musk, is that he could not give a damn personally speaking, if he is rich or not. His main focus has always been on bringing the products he sees as necessary to the future of the species, into existence. As long as he can maintain that, he does not care whether his personal fortune collapses, or whether his businesses look good to banking organisations.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 09:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Winstonian

The good thing is at least they can't take their money with them when they die.

Globalists, nationalist, whoeverist, does it really matter who is in charge. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: berenike
Isn't there some facility now whereby a person can have their consciousness / essence/ whatever transferred to a computer?

Imagine that lot all uploaded and gathering the existing AIs as disciples...


They can definitely clone! I don't think these people will let themselves die, so they have to leave their money to a fake nephew/niece who is their younger clone. we know science is secretly well ahead of where they tell us. We have this Recently, scientists at the University of Southern North Dakota – Baltimore performed the first successful human brain transplant. in 2008 www.brainybehavior.com...



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I am "whining" because I disagree with the murder of innocent people all over the globe?


I think you might need to check your partisan mindset.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Winstonian
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I am "whining" because I disagree with the murder of innocent people all over the globe?


I think you might need to check your partisan mindset.

Yes whining because you haven't established any particular link between those people and all those murdered innocents around the world beyond just your biases.

Plus it's my opinion that blaming solely rich people for the world's problems is lazy anyways. The world is screwed up for reasons that are the fault of more than just your bogeyman "NWO"; they are nuanced and many but you clearly don't care about that. Only care about the easy solution of just blaming a scapegoat you probably have never even met and talked to personally to get a feel for how they really are.
edit on 30-11-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Winstonian

Not sure Bill and Hillary are Super Villains but I'll go with the rest.

Here's perhaps a future Super Villain to add to the list in 4 years.


Unless there is no list because .... BOOOOM !



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 04:40 PM
link   
You think if those old cooks die, they wont be replaced? they have sons and daughters following their footsteps already, just not in the limelight, yet!

Look at those family trees line, and see how much relatives they got, its a neverending supply of Masters.
edit on 30-11-16 by Substracto because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2016 @ 01:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I am sorry, this is ATS right? I was under the impression that the majority of the informed people here were aware of the wars being waged against innocent people all over the globe.

I find it comical how you spend so much time trying to troll other people here because they do not buy into your partisan madness.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join