It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Abortoin is Population Control/Nick Cannon statements Planned Parenthood is eugenics

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 01:24 AM
I'll never understand how God saw fit to make people who so easily rationalize ending an infantile human life.

It's so disgusting.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 04:04 AM

originally posted by: seasonal

But the numbers speak for themselves, blacks by far have more than any other race.

Surely that only proves one thing .... That blacks have more

unprotected, unsafe sex

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 04:13 AM
a reply to: eletheia

I bet it is to do with education and lack of services giving out info and education.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 04:21 AM

originally posted by: seasonal
Nick Cannon feels abortion is genocide against black Americans. He adds that it is population control and modern day eugenics.

How on earth does he arrive at that conclusion???

Do they only terminate for black American women???

n a recent interview with The Breakfast Club radio show he called Planned Parenthood 'real genocide' against black Americans.

As I understand it Planned Parenthood is available to all American

women regardless of colour ... so how is it 'real genocide' against black Americans

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 05:39 AM

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: seasonal

Instead of just saying it isn't ok why not come up with solutions to reduce abortion? closing PP is worse thing you can do. Educate folk on safe sex practices and you will reduce abortion. But if you ban it it will still go on because you can not force anyone to carry a child.

Who said to ban all abortions besides religious "nuts"?

PP just won't get fed funds if they keep it up. They can still perform them, no problem.

Someone else will have to give them the money.

Maybe, like the people who have them and the ones that support abortions?

It's not a civil right.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 07:38 AM
a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

Do you really think that young people don't understand what leads to getting pregnant?

I didn't see anyone say close PP or out law abortions.

Technology development doesn't happen in a vacuum. By working with commercial companies both sides benefit in the long run

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 09:17 AM
a reply to: seasonal

DUH! All "birth control" is population control. You know that the wealthier and the more intelligent have smaller and more well planned families than those of lower economic and intelligence status?

In other words, poor and stupid people are multiplying faster than the wealthy and smart people. So, the evil plan to eliminate "undesirables" isn't working.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 09:19 AM
We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

On Immigrants "They are…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ’spawning… human beings who never should have been born." Margarent Sanger a real piece of work. Anyways a lot of those services are in the darker neighborhoods and the people who get the most abortions are blacks.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 09:33 AM
a reply to: burgerbuddy

or... they can just refuse the medicaid, title x patients....
you do realize that is where most of the gov't funds are coming from right, reimbursements for services rendered, services that are covered by those programs???

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 09:38 AM
a reply to: flyingdutchman2112

Another common claim is that Margaret Sanger called black people “human weeds” and reckless breeders who never should have been born in her book, “Pivot of Civilization.” That claim appears to have started with a post published by the website Life News:

“In ‘Pivot of Civilization,’ Sanger penned her thoughts regarding immigrants, the poor, and the error of philanthropy. Sanger’s ideology of racial and social hygiene bleeds through her writings on breeding an ideal human race: They are…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ’spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”

But the phrases “human weeds” and “never should have been born” don’t appear in Margaret Sanger’s “Pivot of Civilization.” Sanger does quote Karl Marx on “reckless breeding” at one point:

“…This is nowhere more evident than in Marx’s ‘Capital’ itself. In that monumental effort, it is impossible to discover any adequate refutation or even calm discussion of the dangers of irresponsible parenthood and reckless breeding, any suspicion that this recklessness and irresponsibility is even remotely related to the miseries of the proletariat.”

So, again, it appears that these quotes have been taken out of context or incorrectly attributed to Margaret Sanger.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 09:45 AM
Sanger didn't support abortion!! she was arrested for passing out information to women (her first clinic was in a predominately jewish neighborhood!) teaching them how to avoid pregnancy, and she was arrested for that! people were visiting that clinic because not many women really dream about having 5, 6, 7 or more kids throughout their lives! it's not eugenics when any women can go to a clinic, get birth control pills and take control of their own reproduction. there was plenty of eugenics going on though before the pill, it wasn't through planned parenthood though, IT WAS OUR OWN GOV'T BEHIND IT! force sterilizations of large numbers of minority groups and native americans... that is eugenics..
giving women the ability to control their own reproduction is not... giving women the ability to control their own reproduction through the birth control pill ( which Sanger provided alot of funding for it's developement) has probably played a role in making eugenics an unpleasant word, made workhouses and orphanages less prevalent, and given the younger generations a much happier, cleaner, healthier childhood than I enjoyed as a child..

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 12:08 PM
a reply to: dawnstar

Sounds like some revision of history me thinks.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 01:41 PM
a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

No one bothered to so much as blink when HRC stated publicly that she wanted to overturn the Hyde Act. Not for everyone, mind you. If you can afford your own coverage no one would be forcing your provider to offer abortions. But federal dollars? No problem! Anyone who didn't see a free handout of abortions exclusively for lower income individuals as some sort of subversive eugenics is blind. For that reason alone, I'm thankful HRC lost.... not that there aren't plenty of other good reasons.

posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 06:03 PM
a reply to: bender151

Agreed, but I am glad HRC didn't get the POTUS for a number of reasons. But as long as she can do her 500,000$ speeches with out having to worry about mixing up her set of speech for citi bank and her speech to the country, becasue he said they need to be different.

<< 1   >>

log in