It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

My rant on Fake News

page: 4
32
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: CharlesT
The only MSM site I have seen calling foul on this crap is the Washington Times. I found this Op-ed today.

Using fake news against opposing views
Liberals just can’t abide competing points of view
By Kelly Riddell - The Washington Times - Thursday, November 24, 2016

www.washingtontimes.com...

Is there still just one credible MSN site left here? Maybe!


Ironically, the Washington Times is owned by a cult and was created by its leader to push conservative propaganda.




posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:14 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

If you're not an advocate for censorship then that's fine.

I suppose I'll believe it when/if I see it.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:20 AM
link   
What a bunch of drama queens, you all insult and want to make us cry when we don't run to defend their made to offend comments.

Meh you all are cancer to me
edit on 27-11-2016 by Indigent because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent

I'm not a drama queen.

I'm a drama princess.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent

I think I failed to convey my point. I'm not upset that you've called some of my posting "cancerous" at all. I disagree but that's somewhat irrelevant to what I was saying. What I was referring to were three (well 2.5, one of them was expressly a failed attempt to "out" me as professional writer, which I'm obviously not) threads where posters were calling for "something to be done" about me.

My point was that if folks are really and truly concerned about censorship, perhaps they should practice what they preach, starting with our own little ATS microcosm.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Here is an example of fake news for you from ATS. Putin Issues International Arrest Warrant For George Soros … Dead or Alive



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:41 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

According to ats I'm a retarded obtuse shill that need safe spaces, but you don't see me making post after post of how none defend me.

Freedom baby



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

So?

I was unaware that you had an obligation to read it.

Is this the type of material you want banned?



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:45 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You're a hissy fit contortionist.

Do you not understand that every word you have said in this thread and God knows how many others is the real threat to freedom of speech? You can scream about censorship all you like, it doesn't mean a goddamn thing if you're deluded on how it plays in the real world.

MSM is fake and Breitbart is honest?

QYBS!
edit on 11/27/2016 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:47 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Blatantly false information trying to push a narrative? Please ban that from ATS or shove it to the hoax bin faster.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

I'm the threat to free speech because I advocate for free speech while you champion free speech because you advocate censorship.


Normally you have to pay extra for that much stupid.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: DBCowboy

Blatantly false information trying to push a narrative? Please ban that from ATS or shove it to the hoax bin faster.



So you're for censorship.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:54 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Consequence to your speech is not censorship, you are free to say you are gonna kill someone, but that does not mean you won't end up in jail.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent

Then don't threaten someone's life. That would actually be an infringement on the rights of another person.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:56 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

And lies goes to the hoax bin, not censorship.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent

Hoaxes belong there, they don't deserve to be banned as some would suggest.

Hell, some here would be happy having threads be pre-approved by the state before posting.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 01:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: DBCowboy

Blatantly false information trying to push a narrative? Please ban that from ATS or shove it to the hoax bin faster.



So you're for censorship.



If you had seen the 9/11 Forum before they began heavily moderating it you would know why I feel that way.

All Members: 9/11 Conspiracies Forum Update and Information
edit on 27-11-2016 by Pyle because: Formatting



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 01:02 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

There are banned sources here for that reason, are you gonna make a crusade to unban them?



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 01:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent

I will always crusade for more freedoms.

Will you always crusade for less?



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Justify censorship all you want.



new topics




 
32
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join