It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

My rant on Fake News

page: 10
32
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Do you understand what this program is? It's for people who come on temp visas. It was a program that was used until Obama suspended it. Out of 48,000 visas while the program was in practice, it caught 13,000 who were overstaying their visa. This is why the program in question is on the table again.

What it entails is that those wanting temporary visas or refugee status be put on a list where immigration workers visit with them to interview them from time to time. It used to be common practice.

It is being spun into some onerous, nefarious registry, but it really used to be a standard part of the immigration process for certain visa holders.




posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Do you understand what this program is? It's for people who come on temp visas. It was a program that was used until Obama suspended it. Out of 48,000 visas while the program was in practice, it caught 13,000 who were overstaying their visa. This is why the program in question is on the table again.

What it entails is that those wanting temporary visas or refugee status be put on a list where immigration workers visit with them to interview them from time to time. It used to be common practice.

It is being spun into some onerous, nefarious registry, but it really used to be a standard part of the immigration process for certain visa holders.


Wasn't there a photograph taken of proposed plans for the registry that showed one of the main purposes which was vetting Muslims to find out if they believe in Sharia law? Seems like they have a lot more on their mind than you're suggesting here.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

www.google.co.uk...

Not true at all.

Where did you hear that BS???


When asked if he would go to mosques to sign people up Trump said, “Different places, you sign them up in different places It’s all about management. Our country has no management.”

When asked to explain how the database would be different from Jewish people registering in Nazi Germany Trump said, “You tell me.”


Breitbart good enough???



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:11 AM
link   
This thread is hilarious btw. Conservatives really require a lot of emotional support. "You have a brave heart"??? Lol. Weeiirrrdddd.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   
a reply to: kaylaluv




Oh I know. I witnessed it back in the days when he was bunny boy, but got so offended at what others said to him that he had to start a new life here. What a snowflake.


This works against the integrity of his entire argument



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: BrokedownChevy

A temporary visa is a temporary visa.

If they apply for permanent status and the interviews or other interim interactions have exposed who and what they are, they don't have to be granted permanent status. The host country is under no obligation to do that, and since the program was designed partially to keep tabs on temporary visa holders ... we haven't lost them so they can't just "disappear" and overstay their welcome.

Answer this: Why should we take pains to bring in people who believe in Shari'a as permanent residents? It is antithetical to American Constitutional jurisprudence.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




Before you endorse or embrace censorship under any guise. . . use your god damned mind and think.

What are we to make of this statement? Does this go for you too?

:-)


If (after thinking) you still want censorship, then go suck door knobs you pathetic cowardly losers. I don't even want to acknowledge your weak and pathetic existence you puling, whiny, weak, simpletons.

Who is calling for censorship? Show us - if you can

Would you shut up the intellectuals that are calling out the fake news? Because, some of it is actually fake. Are we not supposed to talk about that now?

Should we let it go? Nasty intellectuals - always thinking about stuff and calling it into question. Now - there's censorship...


If, on the other hand, you actually consider freedom, free expression, free speech, actual freedom, then I will consider you an ally and will always have your six.

You've contradicted your own argument so many times - if you were on my six I'd know to worry

edit on 11/27/2016 by Spiramirabilis because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: BrokedownChevy

Brave Heart the movie. Freedom. You didn't get it. Oh well !! Went over your head.





posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 11:03 AM
link   
hahahahahaha

Just woke up.

I see that people are still calling me a Nazi and wanting less freedoms.

SMH

It's funny.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




I see that people are still calling me a Nazi and wanting less freedoms.


Which people?



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 11:28 AM
link   
nice post



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I see that you're the type of guy who sides with the Nazis over the Jews because fake news is like the Reichstag fire—oh, and that you wouldn't hesitate to snitch on the Jews.

There must be some twilight zone in the crumbling mind where this truly happens.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: kibric
what are y'all arguing aboot ?

i cant make heads or tails of it

Yeah...really...slow down everyone.

Now...WHO here is a witch-snitching, Nazi again? I want to curse them.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL! We cleared up the nazi thing how many times now? You prove my point... you can't let a perception go despite evidence to the contrary.


We didn't clear anything up. You called me a Nazi and then denied it.


Reading back...and in fairness to Kali...I have to step in here. Kali didn't ACTUALLY call you a Nazi.

She called you a Jew-snitching, Nazi SYMPATHIZER....much like George Soros (I read that in 'Fake News' somewhere--I think it was CBS).

Easily misconstrued.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Who is the witch? We have not had a good burning for ages.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Ahhh, I see. That makes it all better.

hahahahahahahahahahaha



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: IAMTAT

Who is the witch? We have not had a good burning for ages.


I gonna guess that the witch is Hillary Clinton...but it might also Abe Vigoda...I always get the two confused.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: IAMTAT

Who is the witch? We have not had a good burning for ages.




I think this is the basic test for one. It's about as intellectual as anything else the left does these days.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

You struggle with analogies too?



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

No. I do have a problem when people compare others to Nazis and Nazi-sympathizers with zero evidence or argument. It's the last-ditch effort of emotionally-fuelled reasoning.




top topics



 
32
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join