It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: jimmyriddler
This is the exact opposite of evolution which claims new information just comes out of nowhere
It does?
Don't you think its strange that there are no half-evolved animals anywhere, ever?
Every animal is a transitional form between its parent and its descendants.
*edit: oops. Didn't read Agartha's post first.
Don't you think its strange that there are no half-evolved animals anywhere, ever? How many plants or animals do you know of that have appendages half developed, or unfinished eyes or ears or organs? Name even one? The world should be absolutely full of them if evolution were true.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
...I think I'm going to have to jump ship from my own thread! Lmfao! I mean, seriously... argh I need some eye bleach and a stiff drink after that one.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Raggedyman
what do you think empirical evidence means??
How is the evidence for evolution not empirical evidence??
BTW, I never posted any picture of a frog saying it was evidence. I don't know what you're talking about. Only pic of a frog I've seen is your avatar and you can't blame me for that.
He keeps asking for proof of the steps of evolution, so I posted this:
And his response was 'oh, an illustration of frogs'....completely ignoring the fact that the chart shows the step by step EVOLUTION of snakes to frogs.
TheKnightofDoom is at the bottom of page 9 saying he's a troll. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But he's sure as hell refusing to even consider evidence even when it's shoved right in his face. You can lead a horse to water....
It's illustrations, how about evidence
Pretty pictures are not evidence
It's absurd
Empirical evidence is information acquired by observation or experimentation. This data is recorded and analyzed by scientists and is a central process as part of the scientific method.
What I should have said is that you'd be amazed at how much the scientific paradigms have wrong.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Lucid Lunacy
I am a just an ignorant troll.
Jaden
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: AshFan
I'm far from ignorant, but lashing out is the only bastion of the truly ignorant and spoon fed...
Jaden
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: AshFan
And you called ME a troll LOL!!!!!
Jaden
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Raggedyman
there is absolutely nothing we can show you that will change your mind. you have admitted as much. it can only be concluded that you are entertaining yourself by daring members here to change your mind and doing your best to remain immutable in spite of their efforts.
originally posted by: MuonToGluon
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Raggedyman
what do you think empirical evidence means??
How is the evidence for evolution not empirical evidence??
BTW, I never posted any picture of a frog saying it was evidence. I don't know what you're talking about. Only pic of a frog I've seen is your avatar and you can't blame me for that.
He keeps asking for proof of the steps of evolution, so I posted this:
And his response was 'oh, an illustration of frogs'....completely ignoring the fact that the chart shows the step by step EVOLUTION of snakes to frogs.
TheKnightofDoom is at the bottom of page 9 saying he's a troll. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But he's sure as hell refusing to even consider evidence even when it's shoved right in his face. You can lead a horse to water....
It's illustrations, how about evidence
Pretty pictures are not evidence
It's absurd
Ah, that is exactly the evidence you requested.
If you look at the tree the species are listed and you can do a little research on each to see how that tree is formed, however I read your posts and I very much doubt you will accept it anyways, that would require thinking outside of your glowing self-righteous ignorance.
As a good member just pointed something out, I wonder if all my life the Platypus and the Lung Fish I have seen are fake.
Definition of Empirical Evidence:
Empirical evidence is information acquired by observation or experimentation. This data is recorded and analyzed by scientists and is a central process as part of the scientific method.
I do believe we have that.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: MuonToGluon
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Raggedyman
what do you think empirical evidence means??
How is the evidence for evolution not empirical evidence??
BTW, I never posted any picture of a frog saying it was evidence. I don't know what you're talking about. Only pic of a frog I've seen is your avatar and you can't blame me for that.
He keeps asking for proof of the steps of evolution, so I posted this:
And his response was 'oh, an illustration of frogs'....completely ignoring the fact that the chart shows the step by step EVOLUTION of snakes to frogs.
TheKnightofDoom is at the bottom of page 9 saying he's a troll. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But he's sure as hell refusing to even consider evidence even when it's shoved right in his face. You can lead a horse to water....
It's illustrations, how about evidence
Pretty pictures are not evidence
It's absurd
Ah, that is exactly the evidence you requested.
If you look at the tree the species are listed and you can do a little research on each to see how that tree is formed, however I read your posts and I very much doubt you will accept it anyways, that would require thinking outside of your glowing self-righteous ignorance.
As a good member just pointed something out, I wonder if all my life the Platypus and the Lung Fish I have seen are fake.
Definition of Empirical Evidence:
Empirical evidence is information acquired by observation or experimentation. This data is recorded and analyzed by scientists and is a central process as part of the scientific method.
I do believe we have that.
Illustrations of frogs and whales does not constitute evidence of anything scientific, just good drawings
As for lungfish and the platypus, prove they evolved into,something else, where what
You need to show evidence not pictures