UK Queen Named In Child Abductions - (1964) 2011

Apologies if posted before. I have only just discovered that this incident occurred in 1964 when I was 4 years old.

Apparently this incident was followed by much controversy and even as late as 2011 which I somehow missed.

Was it just another cover up with people dying to silence them? Are the Queen and Philip guilty of abduction and possibly murder? Nothing would surprise me about the UK monarchy.

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

helpfreetheearth.com...

a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite

The "International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and State" is like...one dude that runs a blog and a youtube channel.

Seems legit.

Named by some lunatic on the web with no evidence

a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite

Yep...one guy with an idea.....and no evidence...and questionable sources. "HOAX" bin in...3....2...

a reply to: Shamrock6

Yeah, kinda like Snopes.

Oh wait, they're two people.

The queen certainly appears heartless but this is quite bizarre. Too bad it is such an old cold case and that many witnesses have not survived. More than likely, this has been completely ignored never to see the light of day. But, if true-but that is too hard to fathom. There has to be more to this story. Why torture and kill children? The pieces don't add up. Unless it is your conclusion of another Bilderberg satanic killing. More info is needed but it may be too late. Weird.

a reply to: Justso

I don't know about this being true.

But i do know the Just are viewed as insane, and the insane viewed as Just.

We'll ne3ver know for sure what happened as the witness died a few years back...

We do know that the Church committed horrible crimes against aboriginal children in Canada during those years...

And we do know that the Queen visited that particular school in Kamloops at the time...

originally posted by: JesusXst
a reply to: Shamrock6

Yeah, kinda like Snopes.

Oh wait, they're two people.

Sort of a big difference between "founded by two people" and "is literally one guy."

No?

Sort of a big difference between running around claiming to have indicted the Pope and attempting to determine the veracity of the email from a Nigerian prince.

No?

originally posted by: Tucket
We'll ne3ver know for sure what happened as the witness died a few years back...

We do know that the Church committed horrible crimes against aboriginal children in Canada during those years...

And we do know that the Queen visited that particular school in Kamloops at the time...

It's not the Queen you want to worry about.

originally posted by: Tucket
We'll ne3ver know for sure what happened as the witness died a few years back...

We do know that the Church committed horrible crimes against aboriginal children in Canada during those years...

And we do know that the Queen visited that particular school in Kamloops at the time...

Good point.
Is that the mass graves of children discoveries in Canada from 2014 or so ?

This ?hoax deserves mentioning The House of Cards tv series in 1990s a real life fiction about parliamentary affairs , in which the some of the monarchy and wider aristoractic community have a very particular taste for virgins . What happens , and the DVD of this was cut btw , is a newspaper editor finds out from a lady aristocrat and attempts to blow the secret but he is blackmailed by the PM , who doesnt care but just wants to control the King , who keeps bleating for social and economic justice and won't shut up and get in line . The production is a deep dig into historical life at the time parodying charles diana and hardline conservatives , but elucidating that the pm office has an attache of loyal special forces happy to murder while the pm himself does too. Worth a watch for sure ,was then is now
so While they are not all then they are some and include prince Andrew who is an Epstein client like Clinton . When it comes to the queen then its hard to say and for a start she is a woman but be sure women are sometimes worse at this than men , and there are more than you'd think too, not less. Just because someone is even the queen doesnt now mean they have exemption from scrutiny anymore , when it was said 1 Put Children First those years ago it wasn't for nothing , nor was it wrong and they (the enemies of our innocent descendants) are dropping like gassed flies these days , eg pizzagate etc

Bill Maloney has his story and isn't afraid to tell it either:

This reeks of hoax. Just saying...

originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
This reeks of hoax. Just saying...

It is

rationalwiki.org...

The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State or ITCCS (allegedly est. on June 15, 2010)[1] is a one-man blog that pretends to be a tribunal established to enforce common law.[2] Kevin D. Annett (born in 1956)[3][Note 1] of the Nation of Kanata Canada is the founder and operator of a series of crank one-man blogs and phony organisations, the most famous among these being the above mentioned juridical quagmire[Note 2] of nonsense and pseudolaw, the ITCCS. Annett is also a pseudohistorian, an enthusiastic supporter of the freeman on the land movement,[4] a "bankster" and chemtrail truther[5] and a defrocked[6] transphobic[7] United Church of Canada[wp] minister. He regularly accuses the Vatican, the government of Canada and the United Church of Canada of being worse than Hitler.[8] Annett has his own page on whale.to[9] and has recieved support from other freeman[10] and militia movement[11] cranks, as well as David Icke-esque new age cranks.[12] That being said, other conspiracy theorists aren't so enamoured of him.[13][14] Annett has also fraudulently claimed to be a Nobel peace prize nominée,[15] a laughable claim which is completely out of the question.[16] Even so, being nominated doesn't mean squat.[17] Oblivious to all this, some crackpots connected to the militia movement took the time to congratulate Annett on this non-existent Nobel peace prize nomination.[11]

I have come across this claim before. I know many of you have already jumped on the bandwagon of ridicule (post after post of "case closed" blather and dismissive ridicule)....however it would be good if the small people had the ability to uncover, had the power, voice and means to uncover, on the level that the influentual, the rich and the "powerful" have when it comes to covering things up. And if anywhere near true, this would all have to be covered up. They don't, and that seems to be a BIG part of the problem. History has shown us this, time and again.

If anywhere even remotely true, the powerful have already had the luxury of having the masses laugh it off and dismiss it as fantastic and ridiculous. Several previous posts prove that point. And lets not forget that the one who brought it to our attention has already been ridiculed, another flag of sorts.

I'm supposing that I'll next be ridiculed. It is ATS, supposedly the place to table such fantastic claims, but more recently, the place where ridicule and scoffing seems the order of the day.

Relative to the claim, it would be very interesting to correlate the royal visits to Canada (or anywhere else, for that matter) with child abductions in the immediate area of the visit, within a few days of it, against dates of importance in the world of practiced occult ritual.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
This reeks of hoax. Just saying...

It is

rationalwiki.org...

The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State or ITCCS (allegedly est. on June 15, 2010)[1] is a one-man blog that pretends to be a tribunal established to enforce common law.[2] Kevin D. Annett (born in 1956)[3][Note 1] of the Nation of Kanata Canada is the founder and operator of a series of crank one-man blogs and phony organisations, the most famous among these being the above mentioned juridical quagmire[Note 2] of nonsense and pseudolaw, the ITCCS. Annett is also a pseudohistorian, an enthusiastic supporter of the freeman on the land movement,[4] a "bankster" and chemtrail truther[5] and a defrocked[6] transphobic[7] United Church of Canada[wp] minister. He regularly accuses the Vatican, the government of Canada and the United Church of Canada of being worse than Hitler.[8] Annett has his own page on whale.to[9] and has recieved support from other freeman[10] and militia movement[11] cranks, as well as David Icke-esque new age cranks.[12] That being said, other conspiracy theorists aren't so enamoured of him.[13][14] Annett has also fraudulently claimed to be a Nobel peace prize nominée,[15] a laughable claim which is completely out of the question.[16] Even so, being nominated doesn't mean squat.[17] Oblivious to all this, some crackpots connected to the militia movement took the time to congratulate Annett on this non-existent Nobel peace prize nomination.[11]

I would be surprised if this is not what you would learn in researching even if untrue considering those he has gone up against.
Have you considered what would be done if what he says is true? What a trial ha!

Exposes the secret actions of Vancouver, B.C. billionaire and Bilderberger Jim Pattison to take over CFRO-FM, a listener sponsored Vancouver public radio station, and enforce the coverup of Aboriginal child genocide by Elizabeth Windsor. Elizabeth Windsor and other monarchs, the City of London Rothschilds, and the Wall Street-based Rockefellers were the prime movers behind and founded the Bilderberger group in 1954 to serve the interests of the British monarchy;

a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite
What if it is all true!



siamagazin.com...

Brave Vladimir Putin has told senior staff and associates that Queen Elizabeth II is not human but is a ‘reptilian that shapeshifts between human and reptile form’ and, according to sources close to the President, he has witnessed her shapeshift ‘in the flesh before his very eyes and, in his opinion, as a warning to him personally.’

nesaranews.blogspot.com...

I have been reading some interesting articles regarding this subject last year.

Missing children from Brittish Columbia Canada - awdnews.com...