It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
The repercussions of throwing the presidency to Clinton are almost to fearful to contemplate. Even if the recount goes to Clinton the outcome may well be a hot civil war and the liberals will lose.
And that's bad? Something to be afraid of?
That's precisely why I want Hillary to be president. I came to the conclusion long ago that these vermin will never be defeated peacefully.
So let's have it out and get it over with already.
Unfortunate? Yes. War always is. Necessary? I think so.
Am I allowed to say that?
originally posted by: RickinVa
Anybody noticed how the "costs" are skyrocketing?
She initiallty asked for 2 mill..
Now she is up to needing 7mill.
By next week she will be claiming they need 10 mill.
Do you really think all that money is coming from ordinary donors.... or are big chunks of cash coming from somewhere else?
The fact that they keep changing the amount of money they claim they need is very very suspicious.
originally posted by: thegeneraldisarray
She's just trying to get the 5 percent required in order to get federal funds for future campaigns. And to line her pocket.
Um, what if her goal is all of this? And before you call her a boot kicker, she's been calling out Clinton, trump, and both major parties go being sell outs, war mongers, wall st shills, etc.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
This is just my opinion.
Right now we are in the midst of a political issue concerning the votes cast in 3 states. Hillary lackey, Jill Stein is pushing for a recount.
What does that mean?
If the counts come back the same, then she will have wasted millions on a political gamble. Trump will remain president.
If the count comes back different? Then evil-queen-bitch Hillary will become the evil ruler/dictator of the US.
But really, if the count comes back different, then that means that there are flaws within our voting system. It would indicate voter fraud on a massive scale. It would demand reform, voter ID, more laws, controls over the process.
It would indicate that our system is flawed and that the people in charge of the system, corrupt or at the very least, inept.
So if the bootlicker Stein wants to do a recount, we should all welcome it.
It'll either prove our system works, or it'll prove that it doesn't.