It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Jill Stein Makes Recount Filing Deadline in Wisconsin

page: 14
25
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: mikell

Well, although there is no source here, she seems to have found a workaround in PA: duping voters to do the deed.
www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: mikell

Well, although there is no source here, she seems to have found a workaround in PA: duping voters to do the deed.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


I was hesitant to post the source, but here it is:
www.jill2016.com...



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:33 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

So now Clintons proxy is hell bound on PA, what happen to Michigan and Wisconsin.

I figure that from the three states one maybe the one to take the recount, the others may not even consider it.



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 10:36 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Wow....I really do NOT think you can do this in a county where you do not reside....and heck, even if it was allowed...there would have to be proofs of all of this....PA isn't just going to say..sure...let's do it :@_@:



posted on Nov, 27 2016 @ 11:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyElohim

originally posted by: BlueMule
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

Leaving out important details, nuances, and manipulating half-truths is what right-wing media does best dude.


Depressingly, I think the far right has left this time-honored tradition behind and moved on to outright fabrications intended to create justification for violence. In this thread alone I've seen several people promise bloodshed if the recounts don't go their way.


Justification for violence? What in the world? Are you not aware that its the crybaby left who is throwing fits, temper tantrums, rioting, and threatening electors with death..... just think about that.... be honest.



posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 06:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Well from what Ive read, the real danger is that Stein waited till the very last to file, which slows down the process and if the deadline is missed the electoral votes can be discounted. Don't know how true that is, but she cannot file herself in PA.


It doesn't matter. Technically, Trump does not need 270 electoral votes to win. He only needs a majority of electoral votes cast. Even if they were to succeed in preventing the electoral votes in those three states from being cast, Trump still wins the election 260-232.



posted on Nov, 28 2016 @ 10:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: vor78

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Well from what Ive read, the real danger is that Stein waited till the very last to file, which slows down the process and if the deadline is missed the electoral votes can be discounted. Don't know how true that is, but she cannot file herself in PA.


It doesn't matter. Technically, Trump does not need 270 electoral votes to win. He only needs a majority of electoral votes cast. Even if they were to succeed in preventing the electoral votes in those three states from being cast, Trump still wins the election 260-232.

Ive never heard that. Anyway I read that she didn't make the deadline for PA.



posted on Nov, 29 2016 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: vor78

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Well from what Ive read, the real danger is that Stein waited till the very last to file, which slows down the process and if the deadline is missed the electoral votes can be discounted. Don't know how true that is, but she cannot file herself in PA.


It doesn't matter. Technically, Trump does not need 270 electoral votes to win. He only needs a majority of electoral votes cast. Even if they were to succeed in preventing the electoral votes in those three states from being cast, Trump still wins the election 260-232.



No. That's not how it works. If Trump doesn't get 270 EC votes, he doesn't win, even if he got more EC votes than Clinton. The decision then goes to the House to determine who shall be president. And they "can" require a re-vote from the states, in which case each state then gets just 1 vote, instead of the many EC votes each state gets to send for their guy.



If no Presidential candidate wins 270 or more electoral votes, a majority, the 12th Amendment to the Constitution provides for the House of Representatives to decide the Presidential election. If necessary the House would elect the President by majority vote, choosing from the three candidates who received the greatest number of electoral votes. The vote would be taken by state, with each state having one vote.

Source: www.archives.gov... s.html

www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/key-dates.html

So, now your "representatives" would decide who becomes president.


edit on 29-11-2016 by AMPTAH because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-11-2016 by AMPTAH because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2016 @ 10:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: darkbake

originally posted by: cuckooold
a reply to: loam

What if she is correct and the vote was hacked?

What then?


The computer models show this to be likely. That would cause chaos. My opinion is, if the votes were hacked and Clinton won those states, she should win the Presidency - however, they have to check for hacks in all the states because Trump could have been hacked against, too.


No they do not. Even the computer scientist who ran an analysis said that there was no evidence of hacking. The only 'anomaly' is that Clinton did worse in districts used electronic voting than she did in districts that used paper ballots - which can be explained according to demographics by district.


Right, although Clinton doing worse in districts that used electronic voting than those that used paper ballots is still an indicator that something might be going on. In order for it to be explained by different demographics in the districts, there would have to be a correlation between districts with electronic voting and higher Trump supporters.

There is nothing wrong with checking into it and being thorough. I doubt anything will come of the recounts, however.
edit on 01pmThu, 01 Dec 2016 22:59:05 -0600kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
25
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join