It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Six electors have vowed to cast ballots against their state’s popular vote

page: 6
18
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: enlightenedservant

The American Nazi party endorsed Obama in 08.

So Obama is a Nazi?




posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: enlightenedservant

The American Nazi party endorsed Obama in 08.

So Obama is a Nazi?



But, have you read the reasoning?

TRUMP


"Now, if Trump does win, okay, it's going to be a real opportunity for people like white nationalists, acting intelligently to build upon that, and to go and start—you know how you have the black political caucus and what not in Congress, and, everything, to start building on something like that... it has to be pro-white," Suhayda said on his radio program in July. "I'm gonna project, that I believe that Trump is going to win the election this November," he said, adding, "I think it's gonna surprise the enemy, because, I think that they feel that the white working class, especially the male portion of the working class, and with him his female counterparts have basically thrown in the towel. Given up hope of any politician again standing up for their interests." www.esquire.com...


OBAMA


“Personally,” he continued, “I’d prefer the negro. National Socialists are not mindless haters. Here, I see a white man, who is almost dead, who declares he wants to fight endless wars around the globe to make the world safe for Judeo-capitalist exploitation, who supports the invasion of America by illegals—basically a continuation of the last eight years of Emperor Bush. Then, we have a black man, who loves his own kind, belongs to a Black-Nationalist religion, is married to a black women—when usually negroes who have ‘made it’ immediately land a white spouse as a kind of prize—that’s the kind of negro that I can respect. Any time that a prominent person embraces their racial heritage in a positive manner, it’s good for all racially minded folks. Besides, America cares nothing for the interests of the white American worker, while having a love affair with just about every non-white on planet Earth. It’d be poetic justice to have a non-white as titular chief over this decaying modern Sodom and Gomorrah.” www.jewishjournal.com...


edit on 23-11-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

So YOU get to qualify and justify, while laying a think blanket of accusations down on anyone who doesn't adhere to your mindset.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Annee

So YOU get to qualify and justify, while laying a think blanket of accusations down on anyone who doesn't adhere to your mindset.



The reasoning is very significant to me.

Pro Trump gives opportunity to build on White Nationals.

Pro Obama cuz they can't stand McCain, the white guy.

edit on 23-11-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I call it the lunesta-wine theory.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Annee

So YOU get to qualify and justify, while laying a think blanket of accusations down on anyone who doesn't adhere to your mindset.



The reasoning is very significant to me.

Pro Trump gives opportunity to build on White Nationals.

Pro Obama cuz they can't stand McCain, the white guy.


In other words, ... SHOCKER ... white nationalists vote for their own reasons ... just like you and I do.

And guess what? You voted for Hillary because you couldn't stand Trump. Doesn't that make you more or less just like the white nationalist?



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

So you don't actually hate NAZIs, as long as they vote your guy in?



Keep sharing, Annee. It really helps. Honestly.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Annee

So YOU get to qualify and justify, while laying a think blanket of accusations down on anyone who doesn't adhere to your mindset.



My mindset? I did not make this stuff up.

That Trump fits exactly this description of Hitler?


Of course he was narcissistic. That's why he made people believe in him the way he believed in himself. He had the exact traits of a narcissistic person, he loved himself more than anything, he always blamed others for his own actions, he never felt guilty about anything. He wanted to be worshipped, he was extremely manipulative, did not care about one's feelings. All he cared about was power and greed. That's a typical narcissistic person. www.quora.com...


AND



1. Grandiosity with expectations of superior treatment from others
2. Fixated on fantasies of power, success, intelligence, attractiveness, etc.
3. Self-perception of being unique, superior and associated with high-status people and institutions
4. Needing constant admiration from others
5. Sense of entitlement to special treatment and to obedience from others
6. Exploitative of others to achieve personal gain
7. Unwilling to empathize with others' feelings, wishes, or needs
8. Intensely jealous of others and the belief that others are equally jealous of them
9. Pompous and arrogant demeanor…
www.quora.com...



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

So you don't actually hate NAZIs, as long as they vote your guy in?



Keep sharing, Annee. It really helps. Honestly.



What a dumb remark.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:26 PM
link   
nm
edit on 23-11-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Explain and "reason" away the Brownshirt tactics of your party.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You mean, like these?

Electoral voters 'deluged' with death threats in multiple states


edit on 23-11-2016 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:37 PM
link   
I see some people painting themselves into a corner.

Excellent.




posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Their logic didn't start there?



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 02:02 PM
link   
She could. Keep in mind the intelligence agencies--or 17 of them--concluded the Russians were probably behind the wikileaks email hack. So there's some reason to believe Russia might have hacked our election, since Hillary's policy towards Russia is not friendly. Trump has stated numerous times he thinks Putin is strong and thinks the threat in Syria isn't Assad--and Russia aiding Assad--but is Isis. And Russia invaded Crimea and stole it from Ukraine. Is it at all improbable that they would steal our election too?

Why would hillary get 7% less votes--on average--with electronic voting machines--versus optical or paper ballots? This might make sense if the less populous counties tend to have electronic voting machines, but this is contradictory. It'd make more sense for electornic voting machines to be located in the big cities, wouldn't it? And Hillary has tended to win the big cities across the nation. That's why the major news networks say all the red on the nation is misleading. The red is mostly in less populated areas.
edit on 11/23/2016 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: jonnywhite

And yet, not a shot was fired in Crimea, and the people there overwhelmingly vote unanimously in favor of returning to the Russian federation after a referendum.

All those intelligence agencies swearing it was Russia, and yet not a shred of evidence could be produced by all that power??



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: jonnywhite

And yet, not a shot was fired in Crimea, and the people there overwhelmingly vote unanimously in favor of returning to the Russian federation after a referendum.

All those intelligence agencies swearing it was Russia, and yet not a shred of evidence could be produced by all that power??

There're reports the "referendum" was at gunpoint. How would you feel about annexing wiht Russia if a gun is aimed at you?

Even if it wasn't at gunpiont, Russia has no right to invade a sovereign nation and annex a sizeable chunk of it. That should have been determined by Crimea and Ukraine on their own, not by Russia. Russia should have instead turned to the UN and worked on behalf of Crimea to get what they want.

www.usatoday.com - Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking...

Also I shoiuld remind you the interanational community--and our POTUS--agree Russia's actions in Crimea are illegal:
(this is dated March 16 2014 btw--the sanctions do exist now)
news.nationalpost.com - Obama warns Putin U.S. will ‘never recognize’ Crimea’s ‘illegal’ referendum as West readies economic sanctions...

I should be clear: Russia is not our friend.
edit on 11/23/2016 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks

Might get your 4th Reich after all!


Better then an unpredictable loose canon.


Yeah, why choose for a chance of survival (Trump) when you have a option of choosing instant death (hillary) right ?



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: ShadowLink
a reply to: Annee

I wish you and your kind could be transported to an alternate universe where you could spend the next 4 - 8 years under a Hillary regime, then you could come back and tell us all how glorious it was.



Not many would be able to come back and tell about it. Nuclear war and all.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bluntone22
If the electors stab the voters in the back you with see the real protests and riots begin.


Hmmmm,

Doesn't Hillary have like a million more votes then Trump?

Not sure who's stabbing who in the back.


A newspaper in the U.K. Said Hillary could have 2.5 million more votes than Trump when all is counted


And if we then deduct all votes made by illegals who were allowed to vote without ID (which explains the lefts "argument that demanding ID to vote is "Racist" , somehow) and the multiple times they did so and the number of people who had been officially dead for quite some time by then you will most likely find she lost the popular vote, by a landslide.



new topics




 
18
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join