It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Six electors have vowed to cast ballots against their state’s popular vote

page: 5
18
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 06:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: worldstarcountry

Let's be clear.

Trump and his yes men are the NAZIs.

People still ask "How could it happen? How could Hitler happen?"

We are watching that process right now.



Hitler lost the election, just like Hitlary. Hitler was appointed as chancellor, so it would surmise that the rise of the NAZIs would see Hitlary appointed 'supreme leader'. That is how it happened in the past, so if you are going to be making nazi comparisons, it's best to get your facts straight. I can see the liberals celebrating Hitlary's appointment as 'Dear Leader', and the left will celebrate the mass executions of the 'evil alt-rights' the media has been harping about lately.

That's how Nazis rose to power. The left's discontent reflects the discontent of the nazi supporters of the past, Hitlary being appointed president would reflect Hitlers appointment of the past.
edit on 23-11-2016 by GodEmperor because: content

edit on 23-11-2016 by GodEmperor because: sp




posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 07:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bluntone22
If the electors stab the voters in the back you with see the real protests and riots begin.


Hmmmm,

Doesn't Hillary have like a million more votes then Trump?

Not sure who's stabbing who in the back.


A newspaper in the U.K. Said Hillary could have 2.5 million more votes than Trump when all is counted



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 07:30 AM
link   
That is a great way to start a civil war. If that ever happened without legal (meaning an "elect" brakes a law). It would be a civil war if there were enough subversive electors to overturn a presidential election.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 07:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bluntone22
If the electors stab the voters in the back you with see the real protests and riots begin.


Hmmmm,

Doesn't Hillary have like a million more votes then Trump?

Not sure who's stabbing who in the back.


A newspaper in the U.K. Said Hillary could have 2.5 million more votes than Trump when all is counted

That is less than one percent of the population.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 07:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks

Might get your 4th Reich after all!


Better then an unpredictable loose canon.


Says someone who thinks she has nothing to fear from such because she won't be this guy:



Instead, you'll be enthusiastically saluting right along with the others, and those nice camps out in the countryside will really be just wonderful places for all those poor deplorabes. Won't they?



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 09:25 AM
link   
a reply to: GodEmperor

Hitler was essentially appointed under duress. In order for something similar to occur the government here would need to be essentially ineffective as it was in Germany. Thankfully we don't have a parliamentary system requiring a coalition be formed by participating parties.

However, a stalemate in the college, wherein neither Clinton nor Trump gain the required 270 could lead to a similar situation.

In order for Clinton to mimic Hitler's rise to power, we would need to see Clinton supporters burn the Capitol Building or some other important building to the ground (like what happened to the Reichstag), with blame then being placed on Trump supporters leading to mass arrests of Republican/Conservatives. This would have to include members of Congress not absolutely loyal to the Cabal/Clinton.

This is where some sort of "National Emergency" is declared allowing power to transition from Obama to Clinton, thereby circumventing the electoral system by allowing only Democrats and loyal Republicans to vote on the corresponding Act.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 09:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

Should Trump not be elected, which is absurd, we can expect faithless citizens to act out. Riots are not the worst that can happen.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 09:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

I left this on another thread, but it belongs here, too.

From a Politico article yesterday about six Democratic electors planning to flip their votes: Link


But the Democratic electors are convinced that even in defeat, their efforts would erode confidence in the Electoral College and fuel efforts to eliminate it, ending the body’s 228-year run as the only official constitutional process for electing the president. With that goal in mind, the group is also contemplating encouraging Democratic electors to oppose Hillary Clinton and partner with Republicans in support of a consensus pick like Mitt Romney or John Kasich.


RED FLAG.

Democrats chose at least some electors that don't even support the electoral college and have a "GOAL" of seeing it abolished.

IMO, I think that's pretty sh*tty of the party. Electors should at least support the process.


edit on 23-11-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 09:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Profusion

At least six electors — members of the Electoral College whose votes actually elect the President — have vowed to cast ballots that don't align with the popular vote results of their states, Politico reported Tuesday.

If they carry out their intentions — in effect, becoming "faithless electors" — they would narrow Donald Trump's margin-of-victory in the Electoral College over Hillary Clinton.

LINK


I expected this to happen on a small scale. Thank goodness it should take at least thirty seven faithless electors to possibly change the result of the election.

There's still another step after the Electoral College vote. Congress has to approve of the vote.

I've been thinking recently that this process may be a way to control someone who has just been elected president in terms of picking their cabinet. They may be told that if the establishment doesn't approve of their cabinet, they may not be allowed to become president.

Here's an interesting examination of the issue.

Here's why the electoral college (probably) won't stop Donald Trump from becoming president


I thought these people hated dictators. I guess it's only ok if things didn't go your way and you can change them.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 09:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

Why vote when the Nazi's will just threaten to kill you if you vote differently than them.

This is where we're heading.


Keep in mind, also, these are the ones that demand tolerance from you... There's a reason they lost this election, and this one of them.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 09:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks

Might get your 4th Reich after all!


Better then an unpredictable loose canon.


That speaks volumes of your character.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks

Might get your 4th Reich after all!


Better then an unpredictable loose canon.


That speaks volumes of your character.


Feel free to elaborate.

In the process explain why Trump is not a loose cannon.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 10:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks

Might get your 4th Reich after all!


Better then an unpredictable loose canon.


Says someone who thinks she has nothing to fear from such because she won't be this guy:



Instead, you'll be enthusiastically saluting right along with the others, and those nice camps out in the countryside will really be just wonderful places for all those poor deplorabes. Won't they?


Do you even have a clue what you're talking about.

Have you actually done any analysis comparisons of the 2 candidates in reference to your finger pointing?



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: enlightenedservant

Sad. They just ignore facts you present.

So bent on tunnel vision. No wonder history repeats.

edit on 23-11-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: GodEmperor

The narcissistic personality, anti-establishment, telling people what they want to hear, blaming others, I'll save you, playing ethnic minorities against each other, etc.

That's Trump.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: enlightenedservant

Sad. They just ignore facts you present.

So bent on tunnel vision. No wonder history repeats.

I think that either they know and are simply deflecting (since many far right sites are openly pro-Hitler) or they simply use the most "evil" labels they can find to describe their opponents, regardless of their meanings. It's like the people who call us on the left both communists and Nazis, even though those 2 groups were the bitterest of enemies.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Bluntone22
If the electors stab the voters in the back you with see the real protests and riots begin.


Hmmmm,

Doesn't Hillary have like a million more votes then Trump?

Not sure who's stabbing who in the back.


Popular vote would matter if we didn't have States. But that's now how our country works. You know this.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 10:48 AM
link   
a reply to: enlightenedservant

Actually, I let actions define a group.

If you're acting like a damned Nazi, then that's what I call you!



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 11:43 AM
link   
a reply to: enlightenedservant

I prefer to allow the actualNazi collaborator who pretended to be Christian and called it a happy time in his life in which he has no guilt or remorse for, explain it himself under interview. This is the man behind the communist nazi who was defeated.


Does not really get any more NAZI than that. Maybe this character was a depiction of Soros?? No, it IS him.



posted on Nov, 23 2016 @ 11:45 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Oh really? Then why aren't you labeling the far right wing as Nazis? They're the ones who actually support Hitler, do that 88 crap, and are supporting Trump. Or are you going to pretend that the actual endorsements & support from American Neo-Nazis, the Aryan Nation, and their publications don't count?



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join