Judicial Watch Continues Hillary Investigations Without Trump

Trump aide Kellyanne Conway: No plan to pursue charges against Clinton

‘It's Still Not Over’: 4 Legal Probes Hillary Clinton Still Faces

Judicial Watch, a leading conservative watchdog group, plans to continue its own investigations into Clinton through the use of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. That’s because it isn’t relying on the Trump administration’s Justice Department or Congress to hold anyone accountable.

“The Trump administration and new Congress must focus on restoring the rule of law and accountability after the eight years of a lawless Obama administration,” Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said in a statement, adding:

Corruption in government is an overwhelming problem. We expect, but won’t rely on, D.C. politicians to do the right thing. Judicial Watch will continue its independent investigations and lawsuits in order to hold politicians of both political parties accountable to the rule of law.

After Judicial Watch asked a D.C. court to compel the State Department to answer more questions about Clinton emails, Fitton tweeted Wednesday: “No, it’s not over.”

For an overview of investigations likely to continue even as Clinton moves out of the political arena - Read more dailysignal.com...

“We don’t want to become a country where we have political vindictiveness after an election,” said Rudy Giuliani in a November 14 appearance on C-SPAN with Wall Street Journal editor Gerard Baker. But according to the former New York mayor, there was a bit more to it.

“We also don’t want to be a country of unequal protection in the law. A lot of that has to do with what I don’t know, which is how bad are the things involved in the Clinton Foundation investigation? How beyond the pale are they?”

www.frontpagemag.com...

So it appears investigations will continue without relying on the Trump administration. Political vindictiveness is not the in the plan but no one should be above the law

Judicial Watch Keeps Hillary Clinton In Hot Seat - Nov 22, 2016

a reply to: gmoneystunt


Judicial Watch? Lol really? That's like saying Trump haters of America are investigating the Donald

originally posted by: damwel
a reply to: gmoneystunt


Judicial Watch? Lol really? That's like saying Trump haters of America are investigating the Donald

July 2003 Judicial Watch joined the environmental organization Sierra Club in suing the George W. Bush administration for access to minutes of Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force.[7] Judicial Watch was involved in a similar legal dispute with Vice President Dick Cheney in 2002 when the group filed a shareholder lawsuit against Halliburton. The lawsuit, which accused Halliburton of accounting fraud, alleged that "when Mr. Cheney was chief executive of Halliburton, he and other directors inflated revenue reports, boosting Halliburton's share price." [8] As reported by the Wall Street Journal the court filing claims the oil-field-services concern overstated revenue by a total of $445 million from 1999 through the end of 2001.[9]

In 2006, Judicial Watch sued the Secret Service to force the release of logs detailing convicted former lobbyist Jack Abramoff's visits to the White House. This resulted in the release of a number of documents.[citation needed]

originally posted by: damwel
a reply to: gmoneystunt


Judicial Watch? Lol really? That's like saying Trump haters of America are investigating the Donald

Except Trump haters aren't an organization with lots of high profile lawyers and a large bankroll, in fact, Trump haters aren't anything at all except a "cry-in".
Judicial Watch on he other hand, has the power of informing the law abiding public, who defeated Hillary by the way, just what people in government are really doing, so they can continue to be prosecuted by the power of the VOTE.

Isn't America greater already again?

a reply to: gmoneystunt

This is a far better way about holding the flames to the feet imo . JW can, using the laws to investigate and bring charges .It may be that she gets a full pardon after the fact but sooner or later that get out of jail free card will bring into question its legitimate use . Sooner or later the public will demand their pound of flesh . The way things are going though , we may never see it reported in MSM and even the alt-media may have a hard time decimating it . Someone needs to create a inverted google/facebook /??? . Its one thing to have big brother watching you but another for him to shut you up .

Update:

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton made the following statement regarding reports that President-elect Trump decided that his administration will not pursue investigations into Hillary Clinton’s email scandal or the Clinton Foundation:

Donald Trump must commit his administration to a serious, independent investigation of the very serious Clinton national security, email, and pay-to-play scandals. If Mr. Trump’s appointees continue the Obama administration’s politicized spiking of a criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton, it would be a betrayal of his promise to the American people to “drain the swamp” of out-of-control corruption in Washington, DC. President-elect Trump should focus on healing the broken justice system, affirm the rule of law and appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Clinton scandals. In the meantime, Judicial Watch will vigorously pursue its independent litigation and investigation of the Clinton email, national security, and other corruption scandals.

www.judicialwatch.org...

Judicial Watch plays an important role in the way history is written.

They have exposed many liars.

a reply to: xuenchen

I guarantee after it is all said and done with. Hillary or any Clinton wont dare touch another election with a 50 foot pole. They didnt realize how much baggage they brought with them until now. Good riddance I say.

And when all four come up empty handed (or suicide out, double tap to the back/left of the head) it will be once again left to we the people to bring the clintons to justice.

Nobody in power will touch them, because they have dirt and leverage on almost everyone- right to the top. Hillary has shown her true colors, and anyone willing to take her down for her crimes must also be willing to watch half the government go to prison, and deal with the chaos that it would cause.

It's on us- but of course anyone who digs too deep up and dies

Not trying to take away from this thread, just have a quick question. Would the Judical Watch also be capable of investigating this Pizzagate thing?

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

Well, I wouldn't go that far. Chelsea is only mid 30s, give it 15 - 20 years and you may see her hat in the ring. Bill and Hillary will be long gone and they won't be able to use the crimes of Mommy and Daddy against her, to the extent they could in the near future.

Trump should still appoint a special prosecutor for the Clinton Foundation.I am not pleased.

originally posted by: onehuman
Not trying to take away from this thread, just have a quick question. Would the Judical Watch also be capable of investigating this Pizzagate thing?

not if it involved republicans

originally posted by: buckwhizzle
Trump should still appoint a special prosecutor for the Clinton Foundation.I am not pleased.

All in good time...

Trump doesn't have to say a word right now. The FBI is quietly working away on the Clinton Foundation investigation. After Sessions is sworn in as the new AG, he can ask to review the files on the email case (I am sure there is crossover between the two investigations anyway).

Congress can wait until the new session to re-start its various probes.

Then, a little while later, maybe by May or June next year, when all of the evidence is in...the FBI can pass along a recommendation to the DOJ...and voila.

Notice something important about the timing about all of this? Obama will, by then, be far away from the Pardon Pen - and if the waters seem still until then, he would not be able to justify issuing Hillary a pardon for matters not being pursued against her.

All in good time...

originally posted by: LifeMode

originally posted by: damwel
a reply to: gmoneystunt


Judicial Watch? Lol really? That's like saying Trump haters of America are investigating the Donald

July 2003 Judicial Watch joined the environmental organization Sierra Club in suing the George W. Bush administration for access to minutes of Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force.[7]

And 3 months later Judicial Watch's founder Larry Klayman was ousted in a bitter take-over and it has not been the same organization since. It is a right-wing BS outlet...

originally posted by: buckwhizzle
Trump should still appoint a special prosecutor for the Clinton Foundation.I am not pleased.

Yes...investigate a foundation where no evidence has shown any misdeeds...Meanwhile in todays news...

Trump Foundation tax return shows money given improperly
www.cnn.com...

law and order for us commoners while the elite protect each other and get to walk, what a disappointment trump turned out to be.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Hoh-Leeee. Some body having a nasty visitor or what? Sure sounds like you are having a cry in right here.

originally posted by: mobiusmale

originally posted by: buckwhizzle
Trump should still appoint a special prosecutor for the Clinton Foundation.I am not pleased.

All in good time...

Trump doesn't have to say a word right now. The FBI is quietly working away on the Clinton Foundation investigation. After Sessions is sworn in as the new AG, he can ask to review the files on the email case (I am sure there is crossover between the two investigations anyway).

Congress can wait until the new session to re-start its various probes.

Then, a little while later, maybe by May or June next year, when all of the evidence is in...the FBI can pass along a recommendation to the DOJ...and voila.

Notice something important about the timing about all of this? Obama will, by then, be far away from the Pardon Pen - and if the waters seem still until then, he would not be able to justify issuing Hillary a pardon for matters not being pursued against her.

All in good time...

I agree.

And he needs to fill 4000 positions first and get sworn in.

Give it the silent treatment, Kelley was all over him walking back the "lock her up" promise.

Which confused me. He hasn't and the left seems to be trying to dare him to do something.

WTF? Didn't he say not to let the enemy know your plans?

Her crimes won't go away so no rush. More important things to get done first.

originally posted by: Aeshma
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Hoh-Leeee. Some body having a nasty visitor or what? Sure sounds like you are having a cry in right here.

Lol no, just commenting that Judicial watch is a very necessary and appreciated thing, since they ask those pesky questions that the media helps it's pundits hide when they shouldn't be hidden, unless you prefer your leaders to get away with corruptions of all kinds, and why and who would do that? People of low moral character, or people who when given something, stay bought and looks the other way, and even helps defend them when wrongdoing is suspected. Like CNN and Megan Kelly colluding in advance with Hillary, and all sorts of sordid debauchery.

Just like those at the DNC, or people in the Obama administration like Eric Holder and Lynch. I really like how Obama turned the department of justice into his own super elite defense lawyer team, and kept those pesky inspector generals from being appointed to oversee his routines for so many years.
Or Cheney and GW Bush and Rumsfeld,
when they abused their power while in office. And things of that nature.

And it's nothing to cry about unless seeing criminals being punished and corruption being exposed against lawbreakers bothers you. It seems to have bothered Hillary defenders since Trump says so many mean things though, who are upset that no real criminal wrongdoing can be attributed to saying mean things. (but only if Trump says them). Just try to ignore that those folks preach daily about the nastiness of being bigoted, hateful, and intolerant, while being blatantly bigoted hateful and intolerant themselves.