It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

UNH Professors Call For Expulsion Of Trump supporters For Pro Trump Stance

page: 3
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

What does that have to do with what I said? We've been hearing about the "silent majority" from Republicans since Nixon. After Nixon/Ford? The very next President was a Democrat. Then it was Reagan, Bush 41 for a term and then Clinton. Then Bush 43 and then Obama.

Do the math. Out of the 10 elections between then and the one we just had, that's 5 wins each per party. Every time a Republican wins, Republican voters go on about how the "silent majority has spoken."

It's not an actual thing.
edit on 2016-11-21 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kukri
"A faculty Member of the Women's Studies Program"

That's all I needed to read to understand the problem. My Ex took Women's Studies at Queens University, Kingston while getting her BA in Sociology (an education I paid for). Every Wednesday night when I went to pick her up after class she would be angry, abusive and literally hating me all the way home. . It cost me a relationship and my Ex a diploma as I refused to pay after she dumped me. Whatever it is they teach in that course is so anti-male, feminazi, hateful and deplorable that I can't adequately describe it

Needless to say any professor that would teach such a polarizing and destructive class isn't worth the effort to listen to and their opinion on anything is the anti-thesis of mine PERIOD.

/Rant off

Correction:
She got her BA I wouldn't pay for her follow-on studies.


Hah! Quoted for TRUTH.

The left loves their labels and pigeon holes..



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 02:13 PM
link   
i mean, we got some nutjob professors here and there in Texas, mostly at Shorthorn University in Austin.

But this lady....im glad she is their problem to deal with.
edit on 11/21/2016 by bigfatfurrytexan because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 02:20 PM
link   
They had to be Women’s "studies" professors.

Probably the most useless waste of space subject there is.

And I use the world professor for them lightly as there PHD is not worth the paper it is written on.
A real academic takes a real subject.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 02:20 PM
link   
DP
edit on 21-11-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 02:59 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

www.theguardian.com...



In the end, according to exit polls, the election result seems to have been more about the clear backing of America’s white and wealthy voters for Donald Trump – including white graduates, and white female voters.

www.forbes.com...



Class has been a bigger factor in this election than in any election since the New Deal era. Trump’s insurgency rode largely on middle- and working-class fears about globalization, immigration and the cultural arrogance of the “progressive” cultural elite. This is something Bill Clinton understands better than his wife. Trump owes his election to what one writer has called “the leftover people.” These may be “deplorables” to the pundits but their grievances are real – their incomes and their lifespans have been decreasing. They have noticed, as Thomas Frank has written, that the Democrats have gone “from being the party of Decatur to the party of Martha’s Vineyard.” Many of these voters were once Democrats, and feel they have been betrayed. And they include a large swath of the middle class, whose fury explains much of what happened tonight. Trump has connected better with these voters than Romney, who won those making between $50,000 and $90,000 by a narrow 52 percent margin. Early analysis of this year’s election shows Trump doing better among these kind of voters. At the same time, however, affluent voters — those making $100,000 and above — seem to have tilted over to the Democrats this year. This is the first time the “rich” have gone against the GOP since the 1964 Goldwater debacle. Obama did better among the wealthy, winning eight of the 10 richest counties in 2012. In virtually all these counties, Clinton did even better. What does this mean for America’s traditional middle class, whose numbers have been fading for a generation? Long the majority, notes Pew, they are no longer, outnumbered by the lower and upper classes combined. Yet like the Anglo population, in this election what’s left of America’s middle class has shown itself not ready to face the sunset.


I hope you and hillary keep thinking "its not an actual thing".



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 03:03 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok

How would you feel if your son/daughter came home with the attitude this set of classes are designed to instill in the young people who are not yet set enough to know better. On top of that paying big bucks or watching your young son/daughter get a huge college debt that will hang around their neck for a decade or more?



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: seasonal

I would not let them take such a waste of space course in the first place. If they did they wont get a penny of financial support from me.

I will bring them up to take a REAL degree like a Science or engineering course.

Hell I would not let them get a BA unless it is in History, Law or in foriegn Languages. No Libral arts or Social Science bull#.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 04:02 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok

I know some degrees have requirements. Hope this isn't one.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 04:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: crazyewok

I know some degrees have requirements. Hope this isn't one.


I hope not. Im 44, and have studied women up close for 21 years, while cohabitating with one.

I can say honestly that I am no closer to developing understanding than I was 21 years ago.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok

I agree with you, but, many of these "useless" classes are paid for by making them required for students in the Engineering and Science degrees. The reason used to be that the college or university wanted "well rounded individuals".



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 04:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: seasonal

Here's an idea...

How about Liberals behave like liberals, and actually accept that any young person engaging in politics in a hands on manner, is better than any young person refusing to engage at all?

This is ridiculous.


Sounds like mansplaining. Sexist: check. Wait, white male? Racist: check.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: JIMC5499


at the end, you are buying a product: the certification of an instution that you have met their requirements. If that institution puts a high value on, say, new testament studies, theyll make it mandatory (Hardin Simmons drove me away with this nonsense).

I hate to think we are going to start dividing our education up into schools that are "liberal" and "conservative". But it seems that we already have. And that is not education. Its indoctrination.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

If I went to a private school I'd agree with you 100%. I think that State colleges and universities should be different.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 04:56 PM
link   
a reply to: JIMC5499

I do not believe you and I disagree.



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 07:43 PM
link   
I like this part




“Time to call for an investigation leading to the expulsion of these students,”


Not an investigation of their actions but an investigation leading to their expulsion, yep that sounds like it would be a fair and impartial hearing.
Why even bother with the charade at all when you announce the results before it happens?



posted on Nov, 21 2016 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: shooterbrody

What does that have to do with what I said? We've been hearing about the "silent majority" from Republicans since Nixon. After Nixon/Ford? The very next President was a Democrat. Then it was Reagan, Bush 41 for a term and then Clinton. Then Bush 43 and then Obama.

Do the math. Out of the 10 elections between then and the one we just had, that's 5 wins each per party. Every time a Republican wins, Republican voters go on about how the "silent majority has spoken."

It's not an actual thing.


You need to start coming to terms with the fact your candidate lost the election. Move on.



posted on Nov, 22 2016 @ 04:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: crazyewok

I agree with you, but, many of these "useless" classes are paid for by making them required for students in the Engineering and Science degrees. The reason used to be that the college or university wanted "well rounded individuals".


Thats wierd. UK we do it diffrently.

You just do the degree you pay for.

No taking classes of useless bull#.

If you want do classes of bull# you have to take one of the micky mouse degrees......
edit on 22-11-2016 by crazyewok because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2016 @ 09:06 AM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Nope. I think we are on the same page. I do know that I could have finished my engineering degree in three years instead of four if I didn't have to take the BS classes.




top topics



 
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join