It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: rexsblues
a reply to: Krazysh0t
calm down just a tad, go back a page and read my updated post.
originally posted by: amazing
a reply to: rexsblues
Second, you brought up Al Gore, but what does he really have to do with anything? He's one guy who made a documentary, years ago. Why do even bring him up? He's irrelevant to global warming arguments. That would be like me bringing up, say Rush Limbaugh, again hes got a different opinion, but he's irrelevent to this discussion.
Third, you mention over population. We're not even close to over population. We have more than enough resources for food, power, shelter, water, warming, cooling, money, jobs etc. We just aren't managing our resources properly. It's not an overpopulation issue, it's a resource management issue.
You do know that most Climate models are being proven correct right? I mean they aren't perfect and naturally the VERY worst of their predictions are probably foolish, but that doesn't mean that scientists aren't on to something.
To frame the discussion as sensationalism of science without even discussing any data is a textbook strawman. You can write paragraphs of words about science sensationalism, but science, as I'm sure you are aware since I've seen you speak about the topic on ATS a lot, works with hard evidence and proof.
If you just declare things are sensationalized, thus we don't have to listen to scientists then you are just being a denier.
I really don't care about the political aspects of the Climate Change argument. For anyone who dares to actually discuss the science, they find that things MAY be sensationalized politically, but the science is certainly on to something. Saying otherwise is just dishonest. Even Exxon has admitted as much (internally).
originally posted by: rexsblues
originally posted by: amazing
a reply to: rexsblues
Second, you brought up Al Gore, but what does he really have to do with anything? He's one guy who made a documentary, years ago. Why do even bring him up? He's irrelevant to global warming arguments. That would be like me bringing up, say Rush Limbaugh, again hes got a different opinion, but he's irrelevent to this discussion.
Third, you mention over population. We're not even close to over population. We have more than enough resources for food, power, shelter, water, warming, cooling, money, jobs etc. We just aren't managing our resources properly. It's not an overpopulation issue, it's a resource management issue.
Al gore??? ...is not irrelevant to the political meme of climate change. You need to do some research there man.
We would'nt be close to over population if we didn't have such a large footprint. e.g. we can completely cover the Earth with the amount of concrete in the world today. The delusion I'm talking about is the cop-out argument that we're not managing our resources properly. My point is that we're not ever going to manage our resources proporly with 7 billion people on the planet, it's simply not going to happen. I know It feels good to be optimistic and point out causes in hindsight if not plain sight, but that optimism is the delusion and it's been hijacked by and for political policies.
originally posted by: rexsblues
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Ok awesome, go save the world then, what are you doing arguing with me, go stand on the beach and stop a wave. Go get em hero.
I'm sure we'll all commune under some new sci-fi utopian world where the level of change has come about over night and we've reversed the inevitable... oh, wait... that's not possible and it's not going to happen.
And that's my point.
Carbon credits are a myth.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
No, I didn't know that... in fact, every recent paper I have read has shown some statistically significant inconsistency with observed climate records. You're right they are getting better; I already said so.
Your link, btw, is another pop-sci website.
We may be warming slightly. I honestly don't know for sure. The levels thus far are so far below the noise of the system that I can't consider them accurate.
Ah, yes, when I think of Exxon, I think of science!
It's simple: start a scientific discussion with me and I will debate the science. Start a political discussion with me and I will debate the politics. Try to combine the two, expect me to debate the politics first, because that's where the real danger lies.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: rexsblues
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Ok awesome, go save the world then, what are you doing arguing with me, go stand on the beach and stop a wave. Go get em hero.
I'm sure we'll all commune under some new sci-fi utopian world where the level of change has come about over night and we've reversed the inevitable... oh, wait... that's not possible and it's not going to happen, because that's being ignorant to reality and delusional.
And that's my point.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: rexsblues
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Ok awesome, go save the world then, what are you doing arguing with me, go stand on the beach and stop a wave. Go get em hero.
I'm sure we'll all commune under some new sci-fi utopian world where the level of change has come about over night and we've reversed the inevitable... oh, wait... that's not possible and it's not going to happen, because that's being ignorant to reality and delusional.
And that's my point.
See. This is what I'm talking about. You aren't looking to deny ignorance or keep an open mind. I prove you wrong and you get sarcastic and snippy with me instead of admitting your faults or wrongs.
What am I denying??? I never denied climate change.
Plus I wouldn't describe the 6.5 Billion+ who've never heard of 'climate change' as sticking their heads in the sand, they just don't know, they don't even know not to care. And again, that's my point, that's why nothing is going to change.
originally posted by: rexsblues
a reply to: amazing
that's awesome, I'm all for doing our part. I'm not arguing against that at all. But meanwhile in China, meanwhile the jumbo jet flying over your house, meanwhile the NASCAR race next weekend.... you see my point?
I mean we're throwing a cup of ice cubes on a forest fire, and sadly that's all any of us can do individually. My point is that by the time any of that even begins to have the slightest effect, the forest will have already burnt to the ground.