It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: InachMarbank
It's not falling for all intents and purposes as it's forward momentum overcomes the gravitational force. As long as the forward momentum doesn't slow significantly The inertia is overcoming gravity that is acting on the moving object.
Think of it like this. The satellite is a projectile moving in a straight line. The centripetal force causes that line to curve towards the earth as it pulls the object "downward". This does NOT cause acceleration as the object never actually "falls". If the object were much faster, it would eventually overcome gravity and be slingshot into space, much slower and it's orbit would decay and it would slowly fall to the planet of the course of however many orbits and burn up in the atmosphere. The tangential velocity of the object keeps it in a relatively circular orbit.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: InachMarbank
It *can* be gravity. It could also be a string, or your arm swinging a bucket...
A sling for example uses centripetal force to increase the velocity of the projectile that is being acted on by centrifugal force when it's finally released.
I don't understand how you think it violates newtons cannonball thought experiment. That's where orbital velocity came from basically.
The tangential velocity for low earth orbit is about 17k mph.
originally posted by: Christosterone
The two greatest achievements in the history of mankind were splitting the atom and walking on the moon…first achieved in 1969 by the United States of America....
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: InachMarbank
The ISS isn't doing that though. It's flying in a straight line. Gravity acts as a string that causes the centripetal force. No tension is being added to or released from said force which means the speed is an almost constant.
I have to ask though, because this concept isn't very hard to wrap your head around, what is your angle? What do YOU believe concerning satellites? Do you think they aren't up there? Something seems off with your line of questioning.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: InachMarbank
No I said the speed is constant, not the down speed. There is no down speed as the forward momentum overcomes the force of gravity. All we have is a constant centripetal force that neither adds or releases "tension", hence the elevation is an almost constant. It neither had a "down" or an "up" speed, just a "forward" speed.
All that is happening is a forward moving projectile is being guided along a path by a central string.
You are confusing a centripetal force with "falling".
it's purely Earth's gravity versus the velocity & direction of the ISS.
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: InachMarbank
They are attempting to make it easy to understand. It has no downward speed but it's falling due to the centripetal force. That's what an orbit is. The centripetal force, caused by gravity in this case, constantly pulls the forward moving object to the center at the same rate; Hence there is no "downward speed", just a "forward speed". That "forward speed" is also the "falling speed".
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: InachMarbank
President Trump ...
We Will Go to Mars , Not Because it will be Easy , but Because it will be Hard . Oh , and Did I Mention the Other HUGE Things ?
originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: playswithmachines
Gravity is not an imaginary force...
I think you are cunfusing what centripetal force is. In this case it IS gravity. It's not imaginary at all. It's only imaginary in that it can be any force acting on the object in relation to a wheel/circle.
Forward motion combined with the centripetal force of gravity allows the object to stay in orbit.
physics.stackexchange.com...
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: InachMarbank
No , it was a Play on a JFK Speech in 1962 . You didn't " Get It " I see..........