It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
This is an emotional topic, so any uncivil or trollish posts will likely lead to a Posting Ban. Be forewarned, keep it civil!
Do not reply to this post.
originally posted by: corvuscorrax
I've never understood why it's a more attractive proposition for women to have an abortion than to put the child up for adoption.
originally posted by: UKTruth
It's still a choice.
As for the man, he can't walk away. He is legally obliged to support his child.
Both a man and a woman have the choice initially to have unprotected sex (except in the case of rape)
Both need to take responsibility for their choices.
originally posted by: NthOther
You're still screwing with nature to avoid it's consequences.
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
ABORTION IS NOT THE PROBLEM.
This is not about having porno theaters in your neighborhood.
No one has abortions for fun.
You need to stop it at its source.
Stop unwanted pregnancy and you stop abortion.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
But you have to admit very late term abortions where the fetus was able to survive on its own is a grey area. It's not so clear cut as the fetus has no rights. It's difficult issue and I can see the other point of view. But I still think there is point where a women's right to choose is valid. Maybe the first 3 months. Although many pro-lifers say a 2 week old fetus is capable of understanding calculus. You would think science would be able to shed some light on the whole consciousness alive point in the pregnancy. Maybe measure brain waves or something.
originally posted by: UKTruth
It is not her right, according to the law. There are restrictions around viability. So the woman's right argument as the final arbiter is and has always been nonsense, even when citing Roe vs Wade.
We didn't get here through shagging indiscriminately because we couldn't help ourselves. What utter rubbish.
originally posted by: HarryJoy
It should be standard procedure that any abortion that is not due to rape...or any one that is due to rape and not done as expedienfly as possible ( Service provided free by government program and rape charges MUST be filed ) The woman must be made sterile. And when the "rapist" is caught ....they should be chemically castrated.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrieThe Republican politicians voted NOT to pick up where the grant left off.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
Regardless, there has been over 1.4 billion abortions since 1980 worldwide.
This represents the greatest genocide in human history, the victims, "the unwanted unborn".
Only grown women can stop this now, society has progressed to the point that even if men want to stop it they can't.
This puts a massive obligation on womankind to end this genocide.
the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.
synonyms: mass murder, mass homicide, massacre; More
originally posted by: omniEther
Majority of women who have abortion were not raped and/or did not commit incest.
They just didn't want their baby amd I have to say that's a thin line between first-degree pre-meditated murder
Civil rights are violated when people are deprived of their basic rights in a discriminatory fashion. Unborn children are deprived of life which is the most basic right of all simply based on their location their mother’s womb and their developmental status. This is discriminatory, inhuman, and cruel.
Unborn human beings are living, separate, and unique. From the moment of "fertilization" better known as conception. a new human life is in existence. Ending this life is not ending “potential.” It is ending a life.