+7 more
posted on Nov, 16 2016 @ 02:48 PM
Uintah County, where Skinwalker Ranch is located, had ordered the gates/roadblocks removed along Hicken Ranch Rd.....a road which passes right next to
the ranch house. Adamantium Real estate, the current owners, had petitioned the county to vacate the road so it could be kept private. Obviously they
have an issue with the curious and looky-loos and want to keep people off the property.
The county agreed to vacate the road as of yesterday, keeping public access to the ranch area blocked.
A week or so back there was some confusion/disagreement as to Robert Bigelow being a part of the new ownership, Adamantium Real Estate. There were
several articles in the local newspaper on the road issue, where Thomas Winterton, supposed representative of Adamantium, said in a county meeting
that Bigelow WAS associated with Adamantium.
I emailed George Knapp to ask about this, and he denied it, saying he was with Bigelow's folks removing their property after the sale in April.
Knapp knows Bigelow personally, so he should know the situation. Apparently Springer knows some people (including George) that also state Bigelow is
not involved in any way, shape or form in the ranch ownership. I had also emailed the writer for the local paper that wrote the articles asking for
clarification, he told me he was just repeating what Winterton had said and was confused too. I had emailed Winterton, but have had no response.
Here's a link to yesterday's article on the road and ownership issue. On the left side of the page are several audio clips, Winterton saying
Bigelow was part of Adamantium during the july county meeting, the second him being questioned on Bigelow's involvement by the reporter of the current
(and past) articles on the issue, and again saying Bigelow is a part of Adamantium. I'm guessing he may trying to keep the name(s) of the owners
secret and is deflecting to Bigelow
www.ubmedia.biz...
edit on 11/16/2016 by vlawde because: (no reason given)
edit on 11/16/2016 by vlawde because: (no reason
given)
edit on 11/16/2016 by vlawde because: (no reason given)