It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“This is the news of the millennium!” said the story on WorldPoliticus.com. Citing unnamed FBI sources, it claimed Hillary Clinton will be indicted in 2017 for crimes related to her email scandal.
“Your Prayers Have Been Answered,” declared the headline.
For Trump supporters, that certainly seemed to be the case. They helped the baseless story generate over 140,000 shares, reactions, and comments on Facebook.
Meanwhile, roughly 6,000 miles away in a small town in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, a young man watched as money began trickling into his Google AdSense account.
Over the past year, the Macedonian town of Veles (population 45,000) has experienced a digital gold rush as locals launched at least 140 US politics websites. These sites have American-sounding domain names such as WorldPoliticus.com, TrumpVision365.com, USConservativeToday.com, DonaldTrumpNews.co, and USADailyPolitics.com. They almost all publish aggressively pro-Trump content aimed at conservatives and Trump supporters in the US.
The young Macedonians who run these sites say they don’t care about Donald Trump. They are responding to straightforward economic incentives: As Facebook regularly reveals in earnings reports, a US Facebook user is worth about four times a user outside the US. The fraction-of-a-penny-per-click of US display advertising — a declining market for American publishers — goes a long way in Veles. Several teens and young men who run these sites told BuzzFeed News that they learned the best way to generate traffic is to get their politics stories to spread on Facebook — and the best way to generate shares on Facebook is to publish sensationalist and often false content that caters to Trump supporters.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: SuperFrog
Maybe Hillary should shoulder the blame for her LOSS, instead of blaming her defeat on other teenagers in other countries.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: SuperFrog
Maybe Hillary should shoulder the blame for her LOSS, instead of blaming her defeat on other teenagers in other countries.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: SuperFrog
First of all, check sources. If there is only one source, and the headline is outstanding in its potential ramifications, then you may need to look deeper before posting.
Second, use your wits. If a thing posted on the net does not gel with everything you know about the subject, then scrutinise the source with extreme care.
Third, make a list of sites for yourself, which you believe, on balance, to be purveyors of factually deficient articles.
Forth, check out ATS's resources, to see if the site you are looking at has been mentioned before, and whether it is on the list of questionable sources.
Fifth, remember to write your own thread. Its very important to have a source for your thread, if possible several. But what is also important is that you write a thread from your perspective, not a thread which slavishly follows and over quotes an article you read. The reason for that is that forcing yourself to discuss the topics fundamentals will almost always result in better and more complete understanding of the topic, even if you know those fundamentals well.
originally posted by: SuperFrog
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: SuperFrog
Maybe Hillary should shoulder the blame for her LOSS, instead of blaming her defeat on other teenagers in other countries.
There was no mentioning of Hillary in OP, or anywhere in news. You are bit off topic here.
Why so offensive??
You are clearly off topic, and somehow I have a feeling that you found yourself in this news. Were you part of happy clicker/spread of fake news/??
“This is the news of the millennium!” said the story on WorldPoliticus.com. Citing unnamed FBI sources, it claimed Hillary Clinton will be indicted in 2017 for crimes related to her email scandal.
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: SuperFrog
What offense?
originally posted by: jjkenobi
What is the difference between a fake story made up by random people from another country and a fake news story made up by CNN? Both duped plenty of people this year.
@butcherguy - Don't you see irony that you actually linked Hillary to fake news about her and posted like if she was involved?!
How fake news from Macedonia influenced USA election
originally posted by: SuperFrog
a reply to: butcherguy
Still off topic and still of mark... Hillary did not give any statement regarding fake news as far as I know, and only mentioning of her name was as title of 'fake' news that in my opinion did influence voters.
Now, that you know it did not influence you, please stay on topic or avoid derailing of discussion - Topic is 'fake news and influence on usa election'.