It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: seasonal
It's just part of political hypocrisy.
Like Red States having the most people on welfare and large unemployment.
Seems like the more packed the people are, the worse people act.
That means in a town ship of 10,000 people, the chances are good that 10 of them will be muggers. That also means that in a city of 10,000,000 there is a chance that 10,000 of them will be muggers.
Uh no you can not. It would take sociologists to explore the data and advise law and policy. Same reason I can't look at how poor red at states are an blame conservatism as a principle.
Blue states represent more population than red states. I thought the alt right claimed hate crimes are only for white people? Oh red states use more welfare and entitlements. Worst education systems, poverty levels. Are you sure you wanna compare red and blue states? Blue states fund our country red states mostly take from our country.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
a reply to: Gothmog
It doesn't have to be exact, nor does everyone have to be the same.
The trend is: The more people you have in one area, the higher the chances of having certain types of people.
Higher population densities mean higher chances of encounters of things involving people. Lower population densities means a much lower chance of those encounters.
Understand now? The math does not have to be exact, but the trend when graphed will follow a positive increasing slope.
I got the simplest method of proportion. Did I not name it ? Did I not say it works in the simplest of ways ? However , if you knew probability and statistics you could grasp what goes into a set and/or subset. Study the math- it is fascinating.
It doesn't count unless you provide the RATIO per person, or hate crimes/person. This is what a policy analyst does. California has the largest population by far, so you can't just use raw numbers.
originally posted by: seasonal
Crimes that center around Hate are more common in Blue states according to new FBI numbers.
African A and whites are still the largest targets for hate crimes.
California is the leader in offenses, with New York, New Jersey following.
Middle Eastern people saw 47 occurrences.
Jews were singled out almost 700 times while Muslims were over 300.
Is the 6,000 ish hate crimes out of line with a country with 320 million people?
Why are blue states higher than other states?
African-Americans and whites continue to be the largest targets of hate crimes which are most common in traditional blue states, newly released Federal Bureau of Investigation data reveal.
The states with the most hate crime offenses in 2015 were California–with over 1,000 hate crimes–while New York, New Jersey, Washington State, and Massachusetts followed closely behind.
In 2015, there were 6,418 offenses reported nationwide, a relatively small number when compared to the country’s estimated population of 320 million, while millions of illegal immigrants continue to be imperfectly accounted for.
Blacks saw at total of 2,125 offenses against them which were racially, anti-black motivated. Whites fell victim in the second largest hate crime demographic slot, with a total of 734 offenses. Hispanics, however, suffered 379 offenses.
Americans of Middle-Eastern descent saw far fewer hate crimes in 2015 than other races/eternities with 47 offenses reported by law enforcement.
With respect to hate crimes that are motivated against a victim’s religious belief, Jewish Americans saw more than double the hate crimes against them than Muslim Americans. In 2015, Jews saw 695 total offenses, while Muslims experienced less than half that amount with 301 reported offenses.
Americans with “other religions” and Catholics were some of the others likely to have hate crimes committed against them.
Gay men, which Breitbart Tech Editor Milo Yiannopoulos has warned, are under threat due to a spike in Muslim migration to the country, have seen disproportionately high hate crime incidents against them when compared to other sexual orientation cohorts. Men, specifically, suffered 758 offenses due to their sexual orientation, a slight increase from 2014 levels. Roughly 18 percent of all hate crimes were because of a bias against a sexual orientation.
For Americans with disabilities, physical and mental, hate crimes decreased from 2014 with 88 offenses, compared to the previous 95.
Liberal-leaning states have largely higher hate crime levels than traditional red states. These figures parallel other studies focusing on the rates of modern racial segregation with respect to school districts and housing. ProPublica recently reported that Illinois and New York lead the nation for rates of black students attending schools with 90%+ minority student bodies. With respect to housing, the left-leaning nonprofit named New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, and Cleveland “the nation’s most segregated cities.”
Others with some of the highest hate offenses included Ohio, Arizona, Michigan, Minnesota and Tennessee.
With Texas’ nearly 27 million population, not including illegal immigrants who are unaccounted for, there were 219 total hate crimes in the state in 2015, the majority of which were classified as assault or intimidation.
Of the 5,493 known offenders involved in all of 2015’s hate crimes, 48 percent were whites while 24 percent were black.
www.breitbart.com...
It doesn't count unless you provide the RATIO per person, or hate crimes/person. This is what a policy analyst does. California has the largest population by far, so you can't just use raw numbers.
-Data manager