Feminism now targeting: Mansplaining

Bam. You just had the best post hahahaha.reply to: AshFan

a reply to: Lysergic

or her cats, whatever may come.

originally posted by: Justso Plus, men try to "fix" every social or emotional issue a woman has just when many times women just want to talk it out-not necessarily need an answer.

So now man are wrong for being men? Men fix things - that's what they are designed too do - if you don't want an answer than do ask a question.

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
a reply to: Annee

I dunno what your political leanings are but I'm assuming you would rather Hillary than Trump..tell me I'm wrong.

I'm a Progressive Globalist. "Home Sweet Home" is stagnation.

If that's the case, then I'll remind you that the majority of white women voted Trump..even though he is, in your face sexist.

EDUCATED White Women were the majority demographic for Hillary.

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
Trump..even though he is, in your face sexist.

Find where I referred to Trump as sexist.

a reply to: Annee

I think you may have refered to him as "Sexy".

/shudder

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
a reply to: Annee

I dunno what your political leanings are but I'm assuming you would rather Hillary than Trump..tell me I'm wrong.

I'm a Progressive Globalist. "Home Sweet Home" is stagnation.

If that's the case, then I'll remind you that the majority of white women voted Trump..even though he is, in your face sexist.

EDUCATED White Women were the majority demographic for Hillary.

Wrong. Women with a college degree voted 51-45 in Clinton's favour.
Does college degree mean educated to you and everyone else uneducated? We all know how many ridiculous college degrees there are these days.
When you break down the election further you see that people who can't make a decent living voted overwhelmingly for Clinton. Probably a lot of those worthless college degrees getting put to good use claiming benefits.

originally posted by: Annee
But, yeah - - men turn it around - - blame the woman - - and make themselves the victim.

It's clear that your bias has blinded you.

It's not about "turning it around".

It's about opening it up. Acknowledging the fact that workplace sarcasm, the casting-couch, and many other things are not gender-specific issues.

The real problem is that it's not politically correct to acknowledge facts, reality, or to view the bigger picture as a whole.

a reply to: Annee

What are you talking about Annee? When he starts judging men on an appearance scale of 1-10, taking into consideration the size of their private parts, I'll consider not thinking he's "sexist". Until then, HE"S SEXIST.

Where are the women being appointed to his open positions?

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Annee

What are you talking about Annee? When he starts judging men on an appearance scale of 1-10, taking into consideration the size of their private parts, I'll consider not thinking he's "sexist". Until then, HE"S SEXIST.

Where are the women being appointed to his open positions?

But, when have I referred to Trump as sexist?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
Trump..even though he is, in your face sexist.

Find where I referred to Trump as sexist.

Come now Annee, even an old broad like you should have been able to figure out via context that he meant "in your face" sexist.

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Annee

What are you talking about Annee? When he starts judging men on an appearance scale of 1-10, taking into consideration the size of their private parts, I'll consider not thinking he's "sexist". Until then, HE"S SEXIST.

Where are the women being appointed to his open positions?

He has only made 2 appointments.
Ranking womens looks with your mates in private is not sexism.

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: Annee
But, yeah - - men turn it around - - blame the woman - - and make themselves the victim.

It's clear that your bias has blinded you.

It's not about "turning it around".

It's about opening it up. Acknowledging the fact that workplace sarcasm, the casting-couch, and many other things are not gender-specific issues.

The real problem is that it's not politically correct to acknowledge facts, reality, or to view the bigger picture as a whole.

As I stated - - I'm sure I've "been around the block" more times then you have.

"Blinded" is your word. I see just fine.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Annee

What are you talking about Annee? When he starts judging men on an appearance scale of 1-10, taking into consideration the size of their private parts, I'll consider not thinking he's "sexist". Until then, HE"S SEXIST.

Where are the women being appointed to his open positions?

But, when have I referred to Trump as sexist?

I've never noticed it, but we're on ATS. You are allowed to speak the truth. Unless of course, you don't think he is.
It's okay if you don't. I don't mind accepting the role as the ouster.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
Trump..even though he is, in your face sexist.

Find where I referred to Trump as sexist.

Come now Annee, even an old broad like you should have been able to figure out via context that he meant "in your face" sexist.

Figuring out something and then commenting on it are 2 different things.

I'm not sure its something I've commented on. Don't think I ever referred to Trump as sexist on ATS.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Annee

What are you talking about Annee? When he starts judging men on an appearance scale of 1-10, taking into consideration the size of their private parts, I'll consider not thinking he's "sexist". Until then, HE"S SEXIST.

Where are the women being appointed to his open positions?

He has only made 2 appointments.
Ranking womens looks with your mates in private is not sexism.

Face/Palm

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Annee

What are you talking about Annee? When he starts judging men on an appearance scale of 1-10, taking into consideration the size of their private parts, I'll consider not thinking he's "sexist". Until then, HE"S SEXIST.

Where are the women being appointed to his open positions?

But, when have I referred to Trump as sexist?

I've never noticed it, but we're on ATS. You are allowed to speak the truth. Unless of course, you don't think he is.
It's okay if you don't. I don't mind accepting the role as the ouster.

Its an obvious thing that everyone else comments on.

Don't think I need to.

originally posted by: Annee
As I stated - - I'm sure I've "been around the block" more times then you have.

So you've got ad hominem attacks, and now an appeal to authority.

Are you simply here to toss around the whole gamut of logical fallacies, or are you capable of having a rational discussion?

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
a reply to: Annee

I dunno what your political leanings are but I'm assuming you would rather Hillary than Trump..tell me I'm wrong.

I'm a Progressive Globalist. "Home Sweet Home" is stagnation.

If that's the case, then I'll remind you that the majority of white women voted Trump..even though he is, in your face sexist.

EDUCATED White Women were the majority demographic for Hillary.

Does college degree mean educated to you and everyone else uneducated?

In the context of demographics? YES!

So, you're gonna pick that apart claiming college educated women are not the demographic of Educated.

Whatever. Grasping at straws.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Counterintelligence
Trump..even though he is, in your face sexist.

Find where I referred to Trump as sexist.

Come now Annee, even an old broad like you should have been able to figure out via context that he meant "in your face" sexist.

Figuring out something and then commenting on it are 2 different things.

I'm not sure its something I've commented on. Don't think I ever referred to Trump as sexist on ATS.

Right, but you continue on employing your strawman by arguing a point that was never forwarded in the first place. Right now your question whenit was you said you ever called Trump a sexist, but the post in question went like this:

I dunno what your political leanings are but I'm assuming you would rather Hillary than Trump..tell me I'm wrong.

If that's the case, then I'll remind you that the majority of white women voted Trump..even though he is, "in your face" sexist.

Meaning, counterintelligence, himself, was saying that, although Trump IS sexist, white women voted for him en masse....stop trying to be a victim to everything with nonsense rhetoric.