Will Melania Trump be the best-looking First Lady of all-time?

seems you are the only hetero man on earth that does not find playboy to be erotic depictions of women. so in your singular case....singular..... playboy type pics arent porn..... you realize this is not the mainstream definition of eroticism

Based on the pics from link, my vote would go to Barbara Bush..

at least she can now have her all plastic surgeries done in the white house now.

a reply to: Profusion

You could at least have been honest about your typo edit.
I make jokey jokey you no likey likey?
And i am sorry if you felt personally attacked. Nothing against you. I just saw a harmless opportunity to possibly make someone smile.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Profusion

Playboy-style pictures are not erotic behavior to me.

Tell that to all the teenage boys that don't want to know their Mom's to know they have a stack of Play Boy mags hidden in the basement.

I too prefer Glamour like George Costanza.

a reply to: SPHARAOH

LOL Mom will suspect nothing!

a reply to: CaDreamer

soft porn but yes still fits the definition silly to argue this point

...but how does that translate to her having zero class? O_o

a reply to: windword

She has no expression on her face from all of it; she does dress sharp though.



Jacqueline Kennedy was the most beautiful First Lady, imo.

originally posted by: CaDreamer
seems you are the only hetero man on earth that does not find playboy to be erotic depictions of women.

I have read plenty of debates on this topic online (I researched the issue for another thread). I'm not the only person who feels the way I do at all.

I like how you took the words "depiction of erotic behavior" and changed the issue to "erotic depictions of women", very amusing.

Full Definition of pornography
1
: the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
2
: material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
LINK

Incidentally, I tried to find Melania Trump's nude photos, and what I found was just what Pat Robertson said.



I just saw pictures of her standing naked and sitting topless. What I saw was not in the ballpark of pornography.

a reply to: SPHARAOH

Thank you for your contributions to this thread.

a reply to: Profusion

Incidentally, I tried to find Melania Trump's nude photos, and what I found was just what Pat Robertson said.

Really? Pat Robertson approves of girl on girl naked physical affection?

a reply to: Profusion

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and if one has lots of money, beauty comes easy. But, my husband finds Melania unattractive, while I find her quite attractive, yet not really supermodel material.

a reply to: Profusion

Jeez I have hated the debate about the opinion of what is pornographic or not. "Is intended to" is the part that has bothered me the most for a long time. Is should just be changed to "causes sexual feelings in some people" Trying do define it in such a way as it is now is kinda screwy. This is a personal response to stimuli if it could be proven that 100% of the population would get "tingly by 1 picture/video/teddy bear/box of cereal then i guess it's intended. Until then not in my world.

a reply to: InTheLight

my husband finds Melania unattractiv

I know it's probably the Botox, but she always looks angry to me, and that detracts from her beauty.

originally posted by: CaDreamer
maybe maybe not...she will be the first, first lady with pornographic pics floating around of her...zero class

Would you like to talk about Zero Class?

Let's talk about zero class

How about rating a woman's usefulness, class, and worth based on whether or not she has taken nude photographs. See here's the thing that pisses me of. It gets quite old dealing with BS like this. The entire statement smacks of you determining her level of class based on some barely soft porn pictures taken ages ago.

Can I rate your class now? You just judged a woman on past actions. You made an objective determination on one set of days in her life. One set of pictures. Now you have determine she has no class.

I am sorry...are we not into forgiving past actions? Past actions I might remind you that are HER business, not illegal, and did no harm to anyone unless they have some nasty shaky foundation of their own.

Even if you could somehow validate that she "caused harm," how long ago was this? Come on

a reply to: KyoZero

You just judged a woman on past actions.

What else do we have to base the quality of a person's character on other than past actions?

Money doesn't equal class. Gold gilded toilets don't equal class.

Donald Trump is classless. She married Donald Trump.

a reply to: windword

So essentially....we never forgive?

and let's review....I never said money = class.

All I am saying is maybe...just for flipping once, we can stop judging women on their looks or past pictures

a reply to: KyoZero

It's perfectly legitimate to judge her character by her past willingness to do pornography for money. Also, classy ladies don't marry classless men. Donald Trump is a classless man.

You can't buy class. The Trumps just don't have it.

I can sympathize with the point about classy women not marrying classless men.

Suggesting nude photos is an issue I don't get. At all. Because money was involved?

Let's evaluate the female celebrities most would deem classy that had nude scenes and obviously got paid for it.