It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Pyle
Half the nation lives in those blobs. Those are not some minority places.
Trump has a slim lead in Michigan. As of November 11, the Secretary of State in Michigan was reporting the following totals:
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
Final #Election2016 numbers
#PopularVote: #Trump: 62,972,226 #Clinton: 62,277,750
#ElectoralCollege vote #Trump 306 #Clinton 232
Update: Anyone asking where I got the figures, it was from twitter posts. Knowing the Democrat media have been dragging their liberal feet giving Michigan to Trump – finally they did, with Arizona finally declared two days ago – Trump now has the 309. Except for the twitter posts, the popular vote number still need to be updated in Wikipedia or MSM media – which may take another few days because the liberals are still reeling and recovering from Trump-shock victory. If I’m wrong, I won’t hesitate to change the numbers. It’s the job of the establishment media to tell the people the final numbers when it’s out there already.
As of 11/13/16, CNN and Wikipedia are showing different numbers.
Example below: As of 11/13/16 CNN and Wikipedia quote same electoral vote number for Hillary Clinton but not with Trump – CNN still using the 290, Wikipedia 306 EV. They also differ when it comes to popular votes – CNN has more for Clinton, Wikipedia has less.
Remember, CNN projected a Trump popular vote victory when all ballots are counted. Then CNN claim “design flaw” for the projection.
We know that the mainstream media has been caught lying, time and again. Recently we have also seen how reports by mainstream media have been debunked by social media and not just in the U.S. As an example what happened in Germany during New Years Eve was being hidden by authorities and the media until people in social media reported differently. It was later found that the authorities and media were hiding the truth and the statements made by people in social media were in fact the truth. In the U.S. similar events have occurred which authorities and the mainstream media have tried to hide, and through social media and only after people started reporting the opposite was the truth found.
These posts in twitter include statements made by Judge Jeanine Pirro. We also do know that the mainstream media has been very slow in reporting the results. During the election results i kept switching through different channels to find that CNN was one of the slowest news media channels to update their numbers. Taking them hours to update their numbers when other news channels already had the numbers updated.
We know that Soros, and his "brainless zombies" are part of the globalist agenda to try to destabilize the U.S. from within, so it is no wonder that the mainstream media would be slow in reporting that it seems that Trump also got the popular vote, despite the election fraud and other dirty tactics done by the DNC as the wikileaks show.
As of note, CNN itself at first was reporting that Trump would win the popular vote, now they are saying "it was a flaw". Yet, CNN, and Wikipedia, among others is still showing Trump winning 290 electoral votes and Clinton having 232. When other websites have already reported two days ago that Trump won 306 electoral college votes.
I am guessing the left wing media is waiting to see what happens with the protests to see if they can "switch the results and get Hillary into office by using yet more dirty tactics", and we will only see the final count weeks down the road.
We shall see what happens and see whether it is true and Trump won also the popular vote...
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: DJW001
You still lose, Hillary doesnt win. Suck it up the fat lady has sung...no not Hillary
What is really interesting, there are a boatload of us independents, who aren't and weren't Hillary supporters, that are laughing our asses off at the ignorance of the right.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
I remember trump winning the popular vote on election day, I was watching the numbers all day and he was ahead in everything, including the popular vote. I just searched "election results" or something like that and Google had it's own custom display for the data. Then the next day the MSM was widely reporting Hillary won the popular vote, which I found strange considering I didn't see any data indicating she had won it. I was almost going to start a thread and ask if anyone else remembered Trump winning the popular vote.
How is it possible that a candidate that couldn't fill her rallies could have won the popular vote?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: onthedownlow
the MSM is compicit in any of the rioting and criminal activity currently happening.
Why? Do you think Anarchists get their news from the mainstream media?
If they followed Clinton, then a big resounding YES.
Because the size of the rally is a measure of the fitness of a candidate?