It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

--23 child pornography sites Ran by the /FBI/ in a bid to lure and catch online predators',

page: 2
12
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: seasonal

Personally, I wish they stopped the war on Drugs and did the War on Pedo.

Me, too.
But personally, and I mean that really, those things are intricately connected and viscerally exposed for nth degree control over how they want all that to come out.....surely we all know and are aware of what I'm speaking.....

In other words, for many years, any "agents" who go rogue, are made to look like pedophiles...
what does that tell you? They either end up "suicided" or "pedo'd," nullifying their contribution to "truth."
Just saying.
tetra




posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: apoc36
Probably a lot of FBI agents working late nights in a locked office room, just trying to catch pervs . You know some of the agents are probably just as bad if not worse than pervs they are trying to catch.


From the ones I have seen interviewed, this is the worst duty they can be assigned.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vector99



So putting up child porn, to catch people that like child porn is ok? WTF?


They call it a DRAGNET.


dragnet : a series of actions that are done by the police in order to catch criminals : a net that is pulled along the bottom of a river, lake, pond, etc., to search for or collect something


And, yeah it borders on entrapment. But, law enforcement uses drugs to catch drug dealers, weapons to catch weapons dealers, money to catch money launderers.


and doing that with child porn crosses the line.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Vector99



So putting up child porn, to catch people that like child porn is ok? WTF?


I am not sure they putting up porn as such . Anyways this article is not yet verified . But if its true and they take one paedophile of the streets or more importantly save one child its worth it in my opinion .



'dedicated to the advertisement of child pornography, the discussion of matters pertinent to child sexual abuse',



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: tetra50




Me, too.
But personally, and I mean that really, those things are intricately connected and viscerally exposed for nth degree control over how they want all that to come out.....surely we all know and are aware of what I'm speaking.....

In other words, for many years, any "agents" who go rogue, are made to look like pedophiles...
what does that tell you? They either end up "suicided" or "pedo'd," nullifying their contribution to "truth."
Just saying.
tetra



If they got serious about Pedo, I imagine that they would catch the big fish and then the proverbial "fit hit the shan."

Imagine a former President being tangled up in this and a FBI sting has this info. You want to talk a bout being in a pickle. I believe this is prevalent among our leaders, and if anyone got close, they are dead.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Vector99



So putting up child porn, to catch people that like child porn is ok? WTF?


I am not sure they putting up porn as such . Anyways this article is not yet verified . But if its true and they take one paedophile of the streets or more importantly save one child its worth it in my opinion .



'dedicated to the advertisement of child pornography, the discussion of matters pertinent to child sexual abuse',

Now think of this, how would you feel if you were one of the kids that was put on display by the FBI to catch just one person.

No justification in my opinion is worthy. This is one of those things that crosses an obvious line of things you just don't do.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: tetra50




Me, too.
But personally, and I mean that really, those things are intricately connected and viscerally exposed for nth degree control over how they want all that to come out.....surely we all know and are aware of what I'm speaking.....

In other words, for many years, any "agents" who go rogue, are made to look like pedophiles...
what does that tell you? They either end up "suicided" or "pedo'd," nullifying their contribution to "truth."
Just saying.
tetra



If they got serious about Pedo, I imagine that they would catch the big fish and then the proverbial "fit hit the shan."

Imagine a former President being tangled up in this and a FBI sting has this info. You want to talk a bout being in a pickle. I believe this is prevalent among our leaders, and if anyone got close, they are dead.


Hey seasonal:
Unfortunately, I agree with you completely. I kinda think they're using the pedo angle to catch big fish doing other things. For most of us, that's enough to be friggin reprehensible, but for them.....well, I would just categorize it as they have a different, and given, agenda.....
much as I hate that fact.
I believe, as well, this is quite prevalent and all invasive amonst the powerful, and successful.....
but there is little I can do about it. And have been in a personal position to fight and "not fight," for the threat was too real, when I didn't go along with certain objectives, shall we say.
What are we to do? If I had a choice between fighting Columbian drug lords and pedo rings, I'ma gonna fight the pedo rings every single day, as I don't think the two have any comparison, but....
that's the thing....
It's important that we all realize how these two issues converge and hold good people hostage, for they do.....
but that's a very long story. But the reason they do converge, is to get requisite judgement and draw attention away from pedos, to drug addicts imho.
nontheless, good thread, trying to address a very deep issue. Nothing looks the same close up, as what you thought it truly was, going in, with all the best intentions.
take care, my friend.
tetra
edit on 12-11-2016 by tetra50 because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-11-2016 by tetra50 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vector99



So putting up child porn, to catch people that like child porn is ok? WTF?


They call it a DRAGNET.


dragnet : a series of actions that are done by the police in order to catch criminals : a net that is pulled along the bottom of a river, lake, pond, etc., to search for or collect something


And, yeah it borders on entrapment. But, law enforcement uses drugs to catch drug dealers, weapons to catch weapons dealers, money to catch money launderers.


and doing that with child porn crosses the line.


I assume you mean it crosses the line because they're using real children? They probably aren't. CGI is pretty convincing these days. I'm sure the FBI has some pretty cutting edge perverts to "do it right" for them too.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: hutch622




I am not sure they putting up porn as such . Anyways this article is not yet verified . But if its true and they take one paedophile of the streets or more importantly save one child its worth it in my opinion .


As much as it kills me, if the good guys break the law to take one of these sick-o-s off the street, I can't be for it. I hate the fact that I feel this way.
The main reason is because it would get easy to bend the law to capture another group of criminals, then another, then another group that are not really criminals, but are bad. The next thing is you or I getting nailed because we like this legal activity, but it is now out of favor.

Dangerous, in my opinion.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: windword




I assume you mean it crosses the line because they're using real children? They probably aren't. CGI is pretty convincing these days. I'm sure the FBI has some pretty cutting edge perverts to "do it right" for them too.


My God I hope so.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vector99



So putting up child porn, to catch people that like child porn is ok? WTF?


They call it a DRAGNET.


dragnet : a series of actions that are done by the police in order to catch criminals : a net that is pulled along the bottom of a river, lake, pond, etc., to search for or collect something


And, yeah it borders on entrapment. But, law enforcement uses drugs to catch drug dealers, weapons to catch weapons dealers, money to catch money launderers.


and doing that with child porn crosses the line.


I assume you mean it crosses the line because they're using real children? They probably aren't. CGI is pretty convincing these days. I'm sure the FBI has some pretty cutting edge perverts to "do it right" for them too.


if it's cgi it's a bit of a different story, if it's actual child porn, the FBI is as guilty as the ones they capture.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

Agreed!



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:53 PM
link   
It might be a psy-ops to trap "important" people and use blackmail.




posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:54 PM
link   
Even though both crimes are horrific, distribution seems a far worse offense than viewing such materials. The fact the FBI was engaging in the distribution is wrong in so many ways. Perhaps their efforts would be better served going after the real monsters; the content creators.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:55 PM
link   
a reply to: seasonal

Not to be a stick in the mud, but are you part of Disinfo.com??



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: seasonal

Not to be a stick in the mud, but are you part of Disinfo.com??

The disinfo section has been used by many here. I'm actually curious as to how this forum really works.



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Vector99




Now think of this, how would you feel if you were one of the kids that was put on display by the FBI to catch just one person.


Care to show me where it says they are displaying child pornography .



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   
They need to be operating the exit-nodes local to the perp, or catch information freely given when they sign-up, or try to transfer funds. The malware thing is all about _javascript. It's the first thing people do when connecting to TOR, they disable it.

So for every individual they may catch who doesn't know how to take care of the basics, they're seeding child porn to 100 or more who will skate. Do you think that's worth it?



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: tetra50





Hey seasonal:
Unfortunately, I agree with you completely. I kinda think they're using the pedo angle to catch big fish doing other things. For most of us, that's enough to be friggin reprehensible, but for them.....well, I would just categorize it as they have a different, and given, agenda.....
much as I hate that fact.
I believe, as well, this is quite prevalent and all invasive amonst the powerful, and successful.....
but there is little I can do about it. And have been in a personal position to fight and "not fight," for the threat was too real, when I didn't go along with certain objectives, shall we say.
What are we to do? If I had a choice between fighting Columbian drug lords and pedo rings, I'ma gonna fight the pedo rings every single day, as I don't think the two have any comparison, but....
that's the thing....
It's important that we all realize how these two issues converge and hold good people hostage, for they do.....
but that's a very long story. But the reason they do converge, is to get requisite judgement and draw attention away from pedos, to drug addicts imho.
nontheless, good thread, trying to address a very deep issue. Nothing looks the same close up, as what you thought it truly was, going in, with all the best intentions.
take care, my friend.
tetra

The top dogs in the Pedo stuff from Wiki are going no where. It would literally take a million person riot to remove them form their seats of power that they WILL not relinquish no matter what. There would be so mush a$$ covering and people shuffling to get their chance to serve the top dogs even when they know the evil crap that seems to be coming out of wiki every week.

We need a group of untouchables to get the leaders whom are into this evil stuff. These untouchables got the mob last time, I think it could work.
edit on 12-11-2016 by seasonal because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 12 2016 @ 10:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Vector99




Now think of this, how would you feel if you were one of the kids that was put on display by the FBI to catch just one person.


Care to show me where it says they are displaying child pornography .

Common sense tells me they likely are. If it is CGI like others have mentioned it becomes a different story.

Think of it this way, in a drug sting they sell actual drugs, because otherwise the charges wouldn't stick.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join