It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
Because along with that salary comes a LOT of benefits equivalent to a much higher income. Don't complain about things you don't understand.
originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee
Good grief. He doesn't accept Ryan's position. He just wants a carve out for small businesses. Left the way it is, that approach will ensure many of the little guys wont be able to work for themselves or employ others because they can't afford the expense, and force many to work for the larger corporations most of you rail against.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
Because along with that salary comes a LOT of benefits equivalent to a much higher income. Don't complain about things you don't understand.
Does it? What's stopping a company from paying you 26k, requiring 60 hours a week, and offering no benefits?
Besides that, if they're offering benefits you're not really making 26k. You're making 26k+benefits, which brings your actual compensation to some value above 26k.
originally posted by: loam
Making it more expensive for entrants into the marketplace is always a bad idea. Period. I favor economic policies that encourage competition.
If you want the economic benefit of massively large corporations to trickle down to labor, then fine, I can live with fair wage laws that seek fair compensation to these employees. But, honestly, the real incentive that will create for the 'big guys' is off-shoring to cheaper labor markets or technological innovation to replace human labor altogether.
originally posted by: Aazadan
I see nothing wrong with replacing human labor. It means more leisure time.
originally posted by: Sovaka
It sounds like you guys just have a really pathetic work culture over there.
Stop looking at the Fed as your first problem and look at changing the culture within your workplace.
For example, here in Australia, every company I've worked with and those of my friends and family, if you have set hours, you work ONLY those hours.
If it looks like you are going to go over, you're told to go home.
There is ZERO expectation to work overtime for free.
If you're required to work longer, then you're paid a penalty overtime rate based on your hourly wage.
Not going into taxation laws or living cost references, not too many people want to work more than 38hrs per week here.
If they do, it's usually negotiated with the employer to ensure they get the money they're looking for the hours required.
If your work culture moves away from "suck it up or lose it", you'll likely find a lot of these issues would disappear.
Then you can use that work culture to provide a national force for law reform to allow employers little more freedom to pay employees.
Who bled and died from working overtime? Name them!