It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: enlightenedservant
In the court of public opinion religion is still a big issue in the US, that is a fact.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
So you guys aren't going to address his actual qualifications to deserve the post?? Got it!
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
That's because a lot of people are small minded and scared of their own shadows.
Whether or not someone is small minded is extremely irrelevant. Small-minded or scholar, they have equal rights. With that, intellect is a blurry secondary concern.
I often rail against religion, only because I find it to be a distraction from a well-thought out discussion or argument. BUT, religion definitely has value in that it gives a lot of people comfort and hope (me personally I cant stand the ignorance) and whether or not it has any basis in reality there is a lot of value in hope and comfort. To the elderly, to the terminally ill, to the oppressed. We all know Santa Claus doesn't exist, but how many parents try to utterly convince their kids that he does and why? Because it makes them feel good...in a way, a sense of hope and comfort.
It would seem Democrats need a reminder of this most obvious of human instincts that all men (and women) are created equal regardless of their sexual preference or gender...
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Christosterone
Wow, and this is what is wrong with conservatives. Who knows what is going to happen to the DNC but its really sad that you people are attacking someone based on religion. Also very ironic because conservatives are the same crowd that believes everyone is attacking their religion and religious rights.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
With all due respect, what does that have to do with my post?
I often rail against religion, only because I find it to be a distraction from a well-thought out discussion or argument. BUT, religion definitely has value in that it gives a lot of people comfort and hope (me personally I cant stand the ignorance) and whether or not it has any basis in reality there is a lot of value in hope and comfort. To the elderly, to the terminally ill, to the oppressed. We all know Santa Claus doesn't exist, but how many parents try to utterly convince their kids that he does and why? Because it makes them feel good...in a way, a sense of hope and comfort.
As for this, so? Some people would vote for a corrupt politician who's supposed religious values agree with their own, instead of supporting a politician with "opposing" religious values that is actually qualified and capable of doing their job? That's small minded & counter productive, no matter how you phrase it.
You almost seem to be agreeing with me by comparing it to the belief in Santa Claus to make people feel good.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
With all due respect, what does that have to do with my post?
I absolutely AM agreeing with you on that, that still doesn't make what you or I believe any more relevant...it only makes us in agreement.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: enlightenedservant
In the court of public opinion religion is still a big issue in the US, that is a fact.
That's because a lot of people are small minded and scared of their own shadows. How many politicians have claimed to be religious but have still been corrupt? Nearly all of them! It's not our fault that so many people keep falling for the same BS. What's that saying about insanity and doing the same thing over and over again?
In presidential elections, I've voted for a Christian white male (Kerry); a non-practicing "Reform Jewish" white woman (Stein); a Christian & multiracial "black" male (Obama); and a Jewish male (Nader). You know why? Because I don't give a crap who or what you pray to; I just want results. I even voted for a Jewish atheist (Bernie) in the primaries. And if the next candidate I agree with is Hindu, animist, or follows the Church of the Spaghetti Monster, I'll still vote for him/her/it.
originally posted by: Steak
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: enlightenedservant
In the court of public opinion religion is still a big issue in the US, that is a fact.
That's because a lot of people are small minded and scared of their own shadows. How many politicians have claimed to be religious but have still been corrupt? Nearly all of them! It's not our fault that so many people keep falling for the same BS. What's that saying about insanity and doing the same thing over and over again?
In presidential elections, I've voted for a Christian white male (Kerry); a non-practicing "Reform Jewish" white woman (Stein); a Christian & multiracial "black" male (Obama); and a Jewish male (Nader). You know why? Because I don't give a crap who or what you pray to; I just want results. I even voted for a Jewish atheist (Bernie) in the primaries. And if the next candidate I agree with is Hindu, animist, or follows the Church of the Spaghetti Monster, I'll still vote for him/her/it.
This coming from the guy who thinks it's ok for Islamic Terrorist to kill Americans as long as it's less than those killed by cancer, car wrecks etc...
Sorry - but your opinion is meaningless.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
With all due respect, what does that have to do with my post?
I absolutely AM agreeing with you on that, that still doesn't make what you or I believe any more relevant...it only makes us in agreement.
Wait, what?
So you're just arguing for the sake of arguing? You're straight up admitting that you don't think that either of our words are relevant. So what's the point in replying if you admit that your words aren't relevant?
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: enlightenedservant
You've got nothing to prove enlightenedservant - we know you
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
So you guys aren't going to address his actual qualifications to deserve the post?? Got it!
Wrong...he has plenty to prove to me, I don't him from shinola
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: alphabetaone
Wrong...he has plenty to prove to me, I don't him from shinola
Nobody needs to prove anything to you. Who are you anyway?
What are you even doing here? Can't even type a complete sentence...
Needy and whiny
LOL needy? Whiny? ok i'll bite on your trollery....what do I need? And what am I whining about? Other than the rampant ignorance of course, it's hard not to whine about that when it is constantly flailing around me.
And yes, he does need to prove a lot to me, if I'm to take anything he has to say with any level of credulity. Yes, I will stand by patiently while you google all the multi-syllabic words.