It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Snippythehorse
Perhaps he could start with Glass Stegal.....?
that would be totally appropriate...
He could undercut a large portion of his opposition by sticking to basics......
originally posted by: agenda51
a reply to: Kettu
my history is fine. your just trapped in a two party mentality. Bush Sr. and Junior were corrupt globalists. reagan was a populist and the last good president we had. before him was Kennedy. the rest have all been crooks.
wether they have an R or a D by their name doesnt tell me squat.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Greggers
Ummm ok, if you say so. The congressional majority is R. Trump will be able to do these things.
And yes, the healthcare system in the united states has been on the way to pricing itself out of the reach of ordinary Americans for a long time now. Long before the ACA took effect, health insurance rates were rising steadily, and plans were constantly exceeding their ability to generate a profit and were therefore routinely dropped.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Greggers
A- I'm not a Trump supporter. I simply preferred him over Clinton, and I did not vote, at all.
Healthcare wasn't great before the "ACA" (in quotations for a reason), but it wasn't this horrible thing you portray. The ACA has done one and one thing only, raise rates and tax the youth.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Greggers
Ummm ok, if you say so. The congressional majority is R. Trump will be able to do these things.
His own party has no interest in renegotiating NAFTA.
And yes, the healthcare system in the united states has been on the way to pricing itself out of the reach of ordinary Americans for a long time now. Long before the ACA took effect, health insurance rates were rising steadily, and plans were constantly exceeding their ability to generate a profit and were therefore routinely dropped.
Were you under the impression that the ACA was enacted simply to cover pre-existing conditions?
It wasn't. The idea (poor though it may have been) was to normalize the risk pool so costs would be lower across the board AND better coverage could be afforded by more people.
It didn't work. There are lots of reasons for that.
But going back to the way it was just puts us right back on a collision course with single payer.
And besides, Trump PROMISED to replace it with something better. Are you saying he lied?
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Trump knows how to build new bridges with people so they can make money. If Republican turncoats in congress and senators try to stifle Trumps economic plans, and the American people see his plans are very good and people can clearly see that, but these fools try to play politics and hurt the American people like they have been doing, (and pretending they are on our side), Then we really flatten them all politically next run. Trumps promise to empower we the people again is a valid platform that we deserve as a country, and we haven't had it in decades. No one is going to impeach him based on gibberish.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Kettu
Your speculation involves Trump failing miserably. I'm not a Trump fan/supporter, but I don't think he will fail as a president.
If NAFTA can be renegotiated, and the ACA goes bu-bye, he will be one of the most successful presidents in recent history.
He'll never get NAFTA renegotiated. He has very little support for that in Congress. VERY little.
And killing the ACA doesn't make him successful unless he can replace it with something better, as he promised. The system as it existed before was broken.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Greggers
Really? This was the headlines within 24 hours of Trump being elected.
Ottawa offers to renegotiate NAFTA in effort to warm ties with Trump
Mexico and Canada Announce Willingness to Renegotiate NAFTA
Yes, really.
I said he doesn't have support in Congress. Are Canada and Mexico in Congress?
congress cannot just decide to enact the impeachment process, there has to be an actual reason for it.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Vector99
congress cannot just decide to enact the impeachment process, there has to be an actual reason for it.
Conflict of interest. Sedition. Failure to pay taxes. Influence buying. Acting as an undisclosed agent of a foreign power. Those are just the ones we already know about. Forward the Dominion.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Vector99
congress cannot just decide to enact the impeachment process, there has to be an actual reason for it.
Conflict of interest. Sedition. Failure to pay taxes. Influence buying. Acting as an undisclosed agent of a foreign power. Those are just the ones we already know about. The RNC used Trump to attract the low information voters and will replace him with a fundamentalist Christian free trade globalist, Pence. Forward the Dominion.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Greggers
Ummm ok, if you say so. The congressional majority is R. Trump will be able to do these things.
I can't wait to see how them douchebags handle having the same health ins as the rest of us.
If they want anything above basic make them pay for it, let's see what they pass for us.
Every govt employee, same as the rest of the population.
Think these people need diamond health ins on OUR dime?
F them. Think of the money saved if they have to pay.
As an FYI, government employees pay for their insurance. BlueCross-BlueShield is fairly common and the Government does what many employers do and pays a share of it. Perhaps you are thinking of the plans for Congressmen and Senators.edit on 11/12/2016 by pteridine because: (no reason given)