It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But dig this, in the face of an organized systematic assault of the majority population group (for this I mean wide open border types policies, and mass importation schemes to off set the population that is also being targeted for assaults and ostracization), if they were to ensure self-preservation is that inherently "supremacist"?
In all of its parts, the most basic purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was to preserve the ideal of U.S. homogeneity.
Mass immigration is patently unpopular among White Republicans; more important, immigration (along with “illegals,” “amnesty,” and related buzzwords) has taken on a profoundly symbolic meaning. Immigration is a kind a proxy war—and maybe a last stand—for White Americans, who are undergoing a painful recognition that, unless dramatic action is taken, their grandchildren will live in a country that is alien and hostile.
"In the mid 19th century, many Jews in Central Europe had an idea of an ethno-state, an idea of Zionism, and they were considered ridiculous and insane,” Spencer said. “But they had that dream, and that dream came into reality. Our dream is a new society, an ethno-state that would be a gathering point for all Europeans. It would be a new society based on very different ideals than, say, the Declaration of Independence."
Bannon IS the patriarch of the alt-right. Alex Jones, who spoke at the convention is another leading member. Glenn Beck counts, too. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, David Icke, the Daily Stomper (Smasher? Stormer? - anyway the White Supremacists).....4chan, WND, all of those....ALL OF THOSE are "alt-right."
originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
a reply to: spiritualzombie
Alt-right is some term the liberal left made up out of thin air. In order for them to win, (not in this case) they have to resort to labeling, name calling, and just pure unethical and immoral behavior. The same people rooting for Trump are the same people who were gung ho about Ron Paul.
It is simply a segment of the population who are sick and tired of the way our country has become lately and just want real change, and the corruption to end. So if what that says means a person is "alt-right" well than everyone in this country should be one, if they give a crap about it.
Alt-right as a term appeared in November 2008 when Paul Gottfried addressed the H. L. Mencken Club about what he called "the alternative right". In 2009, two more posts at Taki's Magazine, by Patrick J. Ford and Jack Hunter, further discussed the 'alternative right.' The term is commonly attributed to Richard B. Spencer, president of the National Policy Institute and founder of Alternative Right magazine.[
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
except to acknowledge that she has more experience in the political realm than any other person in our nation.
Not even close, but I guess your editor didn't proofread any of your material before you released it, so your inconsistencies are forgivable.
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
Trump is said by many (including his supporters) to be a leader for the Alt-Right.
The Alt-Right is a movement largely based in White Nationalism, associated with white supremacy, Islamophobia, anti feminism, homophobia, and anti-Semitism.
So my question is... what is the Alt-Right to a nation that celebrates diversity and equality for all? Are they friend to a nation like that?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
no room in your "diversiry" for the "alt right"?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: alphabetaone
of course there is no policy like that. What I can show is a logical chain of events, statistics to support my ideas, and maybe some graphics for extra eye candy.
Maybe ill make a thread about this over the weekend. So as to not dump it here in someone else's thread.
As a primer, ill throw this out there: "adverse impact" is the measurement of if something is racist in a legal manner. That is the hurdle I have to clear, as dictated by the EEOC. And that is a hurdle I can certainly clear.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
except to acknowledge that she has more experience in the political realm than any other person in our nation.
Not even close, but I guess your editor didn't proofread any of your material before you released it, so your inconsistencies are forgivable.
That is a nonsensical thing to say. No person has ever been more "qualified" in terms of a resume and experience than she is. What are you talking about? Even Obama knows it! Calm down.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
I don't believe there is an "organized systematic assault" but I am aware that many people do. There'd have to be because having a sinister agenda to fight against is a lot better than admitting that some folks are terrified by the idea of losing majority status. It doesn't take very much to see beyond the thin veil when you actually read what is being written by prominent figures in the alt-right.
Fabulous.
originally posted by: Kantzveldt
a reply to: BuzzyWigs
True enough that they're happy to be associated with the tag but that doesn't mean they are a part of the Alt-Right, and i do get to point out that they aren't because i know the difference, condemning their phony claim is what i'm doing and what the video pointed out.