It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Right Trumps wrong

page: 4
11
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Yeah...

The problem with that is many conspiracy theorists have insane confirmation bias, and will ignore information that conflicts with what they've been researching.

A lot of the time, people have spent so much time connecting dots...anything that doesn't fit into their little conspiracy map gets violently rejected.




posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:07 PM
link   
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Right, it used to be very good up to the last 2 decades or more.

You pose a very good question here, if these people are psychopathic, they always make sure that they lay out their calling cards for all to see, even though not all see. They leave the Solution and the Problem to be witnessed.

Yeah everyone should have it good, not grovelling at street level for their Rights.



posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kettu
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Yeah...

The problem with that is many conspiracy theorists have insane confirmation bias, and will ignore information that conflicts with what they've been researching.

A lot of the time, people have spent so much time connecting dots...anything that doesn't fit into their little conspiracy map gets violently rejected.



If I had told you about a conspiracy in the 80's I would have been instantly laughed out of the room. I had to get to know people first, spend years building trust, and then gently suggest questioning some simple thing that "everyone just knew was true."

If I had told you in the 90's that one day a vast number of Americans would be conspiracy thinkers, I would have been instantly attacked for being paranoid. I had to get to know people first, spend months building trust, and then gently suggest they do some of their own digging into some simple thing that "everyone says is false."

If I had told you in the thousands that surveillance was pervasive, I would have been instantly argued against and attacked. I had to get to know people first, spend weeks building trust, and then gently suggest they try their own research and see if it begins to affect their other search results on their trusted engine.


I am not saying it is easy.
But we are winning.
Don't loose site of the prize.

Do your own research, and track down ideas that engender solutions.


Mike Grouchy



posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: brokenghost
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Right, it used to be very good up to the last 2 decades or more.

You pose a very good question here, if these people are psychopathic, they always make sure that they lay out their calling cards for all to see, even though not all see. They leave the Solution and the Problem to be witnessed.

Yeah everyone should have it good, not grovelling at street level for their Rights.



The more we believe the "blame game" the more the media controls us.

The more we find solutions, the more the system _will_ follow us.


Mike Grouchy



posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Well yeah, it's just something conspiracy researchers need to be wary of. It can be incredibly rewarding to connect the dots no one else can see, but one has to remember that there might be other "inconvenient" information out there.

I've seen elaborate conspiracies that fall apart after one or two big revelations. Instead of reformulating the conspiracy or dropping it, the researcher or supporters simply ignore and bury their heads.

But yeah, people thought I was nuts when I told them about Eschelon way back in the day. No one thought the government would be scraping up early internet traffic.



posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: brokenghost
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Right, it used to be very good up to the last 2 decades or more.

You pose a very good question here, if these people are psychopathic, they always make sure that they lay out their calling cards for all to see, even though not all see. They leave the Solution and the Problem to be witnessed.

Yeah everyone should have it good, not grovelling at street level for their Rights.



The more we believe the "blame game" the more the media controls us.

The more we find solutions, the more the system _will_ follow us.


Mike Grouchy

You got that right.
edit on 20-11-2016 by brokenghost because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kettu
Trump's grand vision for "making America great" doesn't include 90% of the population.

Oh, he'll make it "great"...great for people like himself and his cronies.

I don't know why everyone thinks they'll somehow get some table scraps if they bend over backwards for wealthiest people in the world.

Keep buying those lotto tickets and scratch offs guys...




Moscow International Development Center.

Cost 12 Billion.



People are having great success all over the Earth, and without gambling.

The American public has spent so many decades examining their own belly button that maybe they have forgotten how to look up.






Remind them!






The Trump card.
Don't leave Earth without it.



posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: brokenghost
You got that right.


A drink!
Ahhhhhhh.


Thank you very much.



This is for you.




And welcome to the solutions lounge.



Mike Grouchy



posted on Nov, 20 2016 @ 05:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kettu
a reply to: mikegrouchy

Well yeah, it's just something conspiracy researchers need to be wary of. It can be incredibly rewarding to connect the dots no one else can see, but one has to remember that there might be other "inconvenient" information out there.

I've seen elaborate conspiracies that fall apart after one or two big revelations. Instead of reformulating the conspiracy or dropping it, the researcher or supporters simply ignore and bury their heads.

But yeah, people thought I was nuts when I told them about Eschelon way back in the day. No one thought the government would be scraping up early internet traffic.



A battered fellow traveler.

Perhaps a stronger drink is in order.




This is for you.






Mike Grouchy



posted on Nov, 22 2016 @ 04:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: brokenghost
You got that right.


A drink!
Ahhhhhhh.


Thank you very much.



This is for you.




And welcome to the solutions lounge.



Mike Grouchy


A glass of bourbon just what I needed.



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 07:34 AM
link   


A trump wall with a Trump bullet train on top of it.
Cost $11 Billion.



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 08:34 AM
link   
Nanometer sized chips.


You read that right.
Not centimeter, not millimeter, not even micrometer, but Nanometer.




GlobalFoundries announced Thursday (September 2016) it plans a multibillion-dollar investment at its Fab 8 computer chip factory in Malta to start making next generation 7-nanometer chips for customers.




Cost for Fab 8? $12 Billion dollars.


Only one word to say, and that is Fabulous.
edit on 15-1-2017 by mikegrouchy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 08:43 AM
link   
a reply to: windword I agree, but it is still federally illegal ....the "progressives" preferred to keep it illegal,,,,how "progressive " of them



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 08:56 AM
link   
It's the Trump era now:

'Screw the 1% --- it's all about the 0.5%'



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: jtma508
It's the Trump era now:

'Screw the 1% --- it's all about the 0.5%'




On a world wide scale that 0.5% would be Hong Kong.

Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom.

Is this suggesting that Trump was elected president of the world, and is to be sworn in at a ceremony in Hong Kong?

Or was that just some tired old appeal to class divisions in a country that is supposed to be about merit, self made Billionaires, and not about what station a person is born into. Because appealing to the top percent in a rhetorical way, is to imply that those people were born into that percentile. And most of them were not.







I bet 0.5% of people were born into their wealth and the rest created it themselves.

Tech Summit Attendees
    Brad Smith, Microsoft president and chief legal officer
    Jeff Bezos, Amazon founder and CEO
    Larry Page, Google founder and Alphabet CEO
    Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook COO
    Donald Trump
    Peter Thiel, venture capitalist
    Tim Cook, Apple CEO
    Safra Catz, Oracle CEO
    Elon Musk, Tesla CEO
    Satya Nadella, Microsoft CEO
    Ginni Rometty, IBM CEO
    Chuck Robbins, Cisco CEO
    Eric Schmidt, Alphabet president
    Alex Karp, Palantir CEO
    Brian Krzanich, Intel CEO


None of these people inherited these positions. They were not born into them. They have earned their position. How about you too?


Don't be jealous, you too can have a Trump card.





edit on 15-1-2017 by mikegrouchy because: format and pictures



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 09:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: mikegrouchy

I still am not completely sure what your doing in this thread. I do however think your doing it well.





He's sucking off the angry man in the #ty blonde wig.



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: mikegrouchy

I still am not completely sure what your doing in this thread. I do however think your doing it well.





He's sucking off the angry man in the #ty blonde wig.


off, or on?
Because off implies I am done.
























Mike Grouchy
edit on 15-1-2017 by mikegrouchy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: mikegrouchy

I still am not completely sure what your doing in this thread. I do however think your doing it well.





He's sucking off the angry man in the #ty blonde wig.


off, or on?
Because off implies I am done.


Mike Grouchy


Don't talk with your mouth full.



posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: mikegrouchy

I still am not completely sure what your doing in this thread. I do however think your doing it well.





He's sucking off the angry man in the #ty blonde wig.


off, or on?
Because off implies I am done.


Mike Grouchy


Don't talk with your mouth full.






posted on Jan, 15 2017 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: mikegrouchy

You didn't get the point. DT will facilitate the concentration of wealth even further up the food chain. The way it works is, you take the wealth from the people below you to concentrate your own. It's math. I'm not trying to divide anyone. They did that already. But maybe that's OK with you. Maybe you have a 'thing' for a feudal society. And if sources is another one of your 'things':


Source This



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join